Comparison Between Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules: Effective Indications According to US Findings

Soo Yeon Hahn, Jung Hee Shin, Young Lyun Oh, Ko Woon Park, Yaeji Lim, Soo Yeon Hahn, Jung Hee Shin, Young Lyun Oh, Ko Woon Park, Yaeji Lim

Abstract

Thyroid nodules are initially handled by fine needle aspiration (FNA). However, the stance of thyroid core needle biopsy (CNB) still is a challenge. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances and conclusive rates of FNA and CNB for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules and to define effective indications of CNB. This retrospective study enrolled 1,060 consecutive thyroid nodules in 1,037 patients who underwent FNA from January 2008 to May 2008, and 462 consecutive nodules in 453 patients who underwent CNB from January 2014 to December 2015 at our institution. Ultrasound (US) features were classified according to the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and Korean TIRADS (K-TIRADS). We compared diagnostic performances and conclusive rates between FNA and CNB groups. Propensity score matching was conducted to match FNA patients with CNB patients. After matching, the diagnostic performances for selecting surgical candidates and predicting malignancy were comparable between the two biopsy groups. Based on US findings, conclusive results were obtained significantly more in CNB than in FNA when thyroid nodules were classified as ACR TI-RADS or K-TIRADS category 4 and measured larger than 2 cm. Diagnostic performances between FNA and CNB were comparable. Superiority of CNB to FNA was found for thyroid nodules larger than 2 cm and classified as ACR TI-RADS or K-TIRADS category 4.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient population according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. From January 2008 to May 2008, 1,096 consecutive patients underwent FNA for 1,109 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) at our institution. The study included 1,060 nodules in 1,036 patients for the conclusive rates, and 621 nodules in 615 patients for diagnostic performance. A total of 452 consecutive patients with 462 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) underwent CNB at our institution between January 2014 and December 2015. The study included 462 nodules in 452 patients for the conclusive rates, and 330 nodules in 322 patients for the diagnostic performance.

References

    1. American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid, N et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1167–1214. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110.
    1. Gharib H, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: executive summary of recommendations. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2010;33:51–56. doi: 10.1007/BF03346587.
    1. Shin JH, et al. Ultrasonography Diagnosis and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations. Korean J. Radiol. 2016;17:370–395. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.370.
    1. Gharib H, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: Executive Summary of recommendations. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2010;33:287–291. doi: 10.1007/BF03346587.
    1. Haugen BR, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020.
    1. Gharib H, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules–2016 Update. Endocr. Pract. 2016;22:622–639. doi: 10.4158/.
    1. Tessler FN, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2017;14:587–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046.
    1. Yeon JS, et al. Thyroid nodules with initially nondiagnostic cytologic results: the role of core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2013;268:274–280. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122247.
    1. Na DG, et al. Core-needle biopsy is more useful than repeat fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules read as nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance by the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2012;22:468–475. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0185.
    1. Choi SH, et al. Thyroid nodules with initially non-diagnostic, fine-needle aspiration results: comparison of core-needle biopsy and repeated fine-needle aspiration. Eur. Radiol. 2014;24:2819–2826. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3325-4.
    1. Sung JY, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration versus core-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy in a clinical cohort. Eur. Radiol. 2012;22:1564–1572. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2405-6.
    1. Park KT, et al. Role of core needle biopsy and ultrasonographic finding in management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Head. Neck. 2011;33:160–165. doi: 10.1002/hed.21414.
    1. Samir AE, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thyroid nodule core biopsy: clinical utility in patients with prior nondiagnostic fine-needle aspirate. Thyroid. 2012;22:461–467. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0061.
    1. Han S, Shin JH, Hahn SY, Oh YL. Modified Core Biopsy Technique to Increase Diagnostic Yields for Well-Circumscribed Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Retrospective Analysis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1155–1159. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4650.
    1. Jung CK, et al. Pathology Reporting of Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy: A Proposal of the Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy Study Group. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2015;49:288–299. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2015.06.04.
    1. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009;19:1159–1165. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0274.
    1. Na DG, et al. Core Needle Biopsy of the Thyroid: 2016 Consensus Statement and Recommendations from Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J. Radiol. 2017;18:217–237. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.217.
    1. Suh CH, et al. Efficacy and safety of core-needle biopsy in initially detected thyroid nodules via propensity score analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07924-z.
    1. Kim SY, et al. Fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy for diagnosis of thyroid malignancy and neoplasm: a matched cohort study. Eur. Radiol. 2017;27:801–811. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4424-1.
    1. Lee SH, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with non-diagnostic thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology: usefulness of the thyroid core needle biopsy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014;21:1870–1877. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3365-z.
    1. Trimboli P, et al. The use of core needle biopsy as first-line in diagnosis of thyroid nodules reduces false negative and inconclusive data reported by fine-needle aspiration. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-61.
    1. Chung SR, Suh CH, Baek JH, Choi YJ, Lee JH. The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of initially detected thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28:4909–4918. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5494-z.
    1. Renshaw AA, Pinnar N. Comparison of thyroid fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007;128:370–374. doi: 10.1309/07TL3V58337TXHMC.
    1. Yoon JH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Moon HJ. Effectiveness and limitations of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules: review of current literature. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2015;49:230–235. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2015.03.21.
    1. Novoa E, Gurtler N, Arnoux A, Kraft M. Role of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy in the assessment of head and neck lesions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Head. Neck. 2012;34:1497–1503. doi: 10.1002/hed.21821.
    1. Choe J, Baek JH, Park HS, Choi YJ, Lee JH. Core needle biopsy of thyroid nodules: outcomes and safety from a large single-center single-operator study. Acta Radiol. 2018;59:924–931. doi: 10.1177/0284185117741916.
    1. Haugen BR. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What is new and what has changed? Cancer. 2017;123:372–381. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30360.
    1. Nasrollah N, et al. Patient’s comfort with and tolerability of thyroid core needle biopsy. Endocr. 2014;45:79–83. doi: 10.1007/s12020-013-9979-x.
    1. Jeong EJ, et al. A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Core Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules: Pain, Tolerability, and Complications. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;33:114–120. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.1.114.
    1. Hahn SY, Shin JH, Oh YL. What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasonography-Guided Thyroid Biopsy of Cytologically Inconclusive Nodules? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017;38:777–781. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5075.
    1. Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat. Med. 2007;26:734–753. doi: 10.1002/sim.2580.
    1. Hahn SY, et al. Preoperative differentiation between noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) and non-NIFTP. Clin. Endocrinol. 2017;86:444–450. doi: 10.1111/cen.13263.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren