Oral Tecovirimat for the Treatment of Smallpox

Douglas W Grosenbach, Kady Honeychurch, Eric A Rose, Jarasvech Chinsangaram, Annie Frimm, Biswajit Maiti, Candace Lovejoy, Ingrid Meara, Paul Long, Dennis E Hruby, Douglas W Grosenbach, Kady Honeychurch, Eric A Rose, Jarasvech Chinsangaram, Annie Frimm, Biswajit Maiti, Candace Lovejoy, Ingrid Meara, Paul Long, Dennis E Hruby

Abstract

Background: Smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, but variola virus (VARV), which causes smallpox, still exists. There is no known effective treatment for smallpox; therefore, tecovirimat is being developed as an oral smallpox therapy. Because clinical trials in a context of natural disease are not possible, an alternative developmental path to evaluate efficacy and safety was needed.

Methods: We investigated the efficacy of tecovirimat in nonhuman primate (monkeypox) and rabbit (rabbitpox) models in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Animal Efficacy Rule, which was interpreted for smallpox therapeutics by an expert advisory committee. We also conducted a placebo-controlled pharmacokinetic and safety trial involving 449 adult volunteers.

Results: The minimum dose of tecovirimat required in order to achieve more than 90% survival in the monkeypox model was 10 mg per kilogram of body weight for 14 days, and a dose of 40 mg per kilogram for 14 days was similarly efficacious in the rabbitpox model. Although the effective dose per kilogram was higher in rabbits, exposure was lower, with a mean steady-state maximum, minimum, and average (mean) concentration (Cmax, Cmin, and Cavg, respectively) of 374, 25, and 138 ng per milliliter, respectively, in rabbits and 1444, 169, and 598 ng per milliliter in nonhuman primates, as well as an area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC0-24hr) of 3318 ng×hours per milliliter in rabbits and 14,352 ng×hours per milliliter in nonhuman primates. These findings suggested that the nonhuman primate was the more conservative model for the estimation of the required drug exposure in humans. A dose of 600 mg twice daily for 14 days was selected for testing in humans and provided exposures in excess of those in nonhuman primates (mean steady-state Cmax, Cmin, and Cavg of 2209, 690, and 1270 ng per milliliter and AUC0-24hr of 30,632 ng×hours per milliliter). No pattern of troubling adverse events was observed.

Conclusions: On the basis of its efficacy in two animal models and pharmacokinetic and safety data in humans, tecovirimat is being advanced as a therapy for smallpox in accordance with the FDA Animal Rule. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02474589 .).

Figures

Figure 1. Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of…
Figure 1. Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Tecovirimat in Animal Models
On day 0, nonhuman primates (Panels A and B) and rabbits (Panels C and D) were infected with a lethal dose of monkeypox virus or rabbitpox virus, respectively. Survival was monitored for 18 to 42 days after infection, indicated on the horizontal axis labels. Tecovirimat was administered by oral gavage at doses ranging from 0.3 to 20 mg per kilogram of body weight in nonhuman primates and from 20 to 120 mg per kilogram in rabbits. Tecovirimat was administered for 14 consecutive daily doses starting on day 4 after infection, after the onset of clinical signs (pock lesions in nonhuman primates and fever and viremia in rabbits) in each study. Comparison of the exposures required for efficacy in rabbits and nonhuman primates showed that the nonhuman primate was the more conservative model, with higher exposures required for full effectiveness. Therefore, the exposure profiles of tecovirimat in plasma in nonhuman primates and humans were compared after the first dose (Panel E) and after the last dose at steady state (Panel F) to evaluate whether exposures in humans exceeded those in nonhuman primates, providing a reasonable expectation of efficacy in humans.
Figure 2. Differences in Survival Rates with…
Figure 2. Differences in Survival Rates with Tecovirimat as Compared with Placebo
Shown is a forest-plot summary comparing differences in survival rates between tecovirimat and placebo in each study. The exact 95% confidence intervals (horizontal bars in the forest plot) are based on the score statistic of the difference in survival rates. The P value is from a one-sided Fisher’s exact test for the comparison of tecovirimat with placebo. Data from the study of dose exploration and pharmacokinetics in rabbits are not shown on the forest plot, since the study did not include a placebo control.

References

    1. Virus taxonomy: the classification and nomenclature of viruses — 9th Report of the ICTV. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012. ( )
    1. Weiss MM, Weiss PD, Mathisen G, Guze P. Rethinking smallpox. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1668–73.
    1. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1988.
    1. Henderson DA. The looming threat of bioterrorism. Science. 1999;283:1279–82.
    1. Gellman B. Washington Post. Nov 5, 2002. 4 Nations thought to possess smallpox.
    1. Kupferschmidt K. Labmade smallpox is possible, study shows. Science. 2017;357:115–6.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. New drug and biological drug products: evidence needed to demonstrate effectiveness of new drugs when human efficacy studies are not ethical or feasible. Fed Regist. 2002;67(105):37988–98.
    1. CDER drug and biologic animal rule approvals. 2018 Mar 30; ( )
    1. Yang G, Pevear DC, Davies MH, et al. An orally bioavailable antipoxvirus compound (ST-246) inhibits extracellular virus formation and protects mice from lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. J Virol. 2005;79:13139–49.
    1. Blasco R, Moss B. Extracellular vaccinia virus formation and cell-to-cell virus transmission are prevented by deletion of the gene encoding the 37,000-Dalton outer envelope protein. J Virol. 1991;65:5910–20.
    1. Gurt I, Abdalrhman I, Katz E. Pathogenicity and immunogenicity in mice of vaccinia viruses mutated in the viral envelope proteins A33R and B5R. Antiviral Res. 2006;69:158–64.
    1. McIntosh AA, Smith GL. Vaccinia virus glycoprotein A34R is required for infectivity of extracellular enveloped virus. J Virol. 1996;70:272–81.
    1. Payne LG. Significance of extracellular enveloped virus in the in vitro and in vivo dissemination of vaccinia. J Gen Virol. 1980;50:89–100.
    1. Smith GL, Vanderplasschen A, Law M. The formation and function of extracellular enveloped vaccinia virus. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:2915–31.
    1. Wolffe EJ, Isaacs SN, Moss B. Deletion of the vaccinia virus B5R gene encoding a 42-kilodalton membrane glycoprotein inhibits extracellular virus envelope formation and dissemination. J Virol. 1993;67:4732–41.
    1. Duraffour S, Snoeck R, de Vos R, et al. Activity of the anti-orthopoxvirus compound ST-246 against vaccinia, cowpox and camelpox viruses in cell monolayers and organotypic raft cultures. Antivir Ther. 2007;12:1205–16.
    1. Nalca A, Hatkin JM, Garza NL, et al. Evaluation of orally delivered ST-246 as postexposure prophylactic and antiviral therapeutic in an aerosolized rabbitpox rabbit model. Antiviral Res. 2008;79:121–7.
    1. Quenelle DC, Buller RM, Parker S, et al. Efficacy of delayed treatment with ST-246 given orally against systemic orthopoxvirus infections in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:689–95.
    1. Quenelle DC, Prichard MN, Keith KA, et al. Synergistic efficacy of the combination of ST-246 with CMX001 against orthopoxviruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4118–24.
    1. Sbrana E, Jordan R, Hruby DE, et al. Efficacy of the antipoxvirus compound ST-246 for treatment of severe orthopoxvirus infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:768–73.
    1. Huggins J, Goff A, Hensley L, et al. Nonhuman primates are protected from smallpox virus or monkeypox virus challenges by the antiviral drug ST-246. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2620–5.
    1. Jordan R, Goff A, Frimm A, et al. ST-246 antiviral efficacy in a nonhuman primate monkeypox model: determination of the minimal effective dose and human dose justification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:1817–22.
    1. Mucker EM, Goff AJ, Shamblin JD, et al. Efficacy of tecovirimat (ST-246) in nonhuman primates infected with variola virus (smallpox) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:6246–53.
    1. Adams MM, Rice AD, Moyer RW. Rabbitpox virus and vaccinia virus infection of rabbits as a model for human smallpox. J Virol. 2007;81:11084–95.
    1. Earl PL, Americo JL, Wyatt LS, et al. Immunogenicity of a highly attenuated MVA smallpox vaccine and protection against monkeypox. Nature. 2004;428:182–5.
    1. Berhanu A, Prigge JT, Silvera PM, Honeychurch KM, Hruby DE, Grosenbach DW. Treatment with the smallpox antiviral tecovirimat (ST-246) alone or in combination with ACAM2000 vaccination is effective as a postsymptomatic therapy for monkeypox virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4296–300.
    1. Chinsangaram J, Honeychurch KM, Tyavanagimatt SR, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of the anti-orthopoxvirus compound ST-246 following a single daily oral dose for 14 days in human volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4900–5.
    1. Jordan R, Chinsangaram J, Bolken TC, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of the antiorthopoxvirus compound ST-246 following repeat oral dosing in healthy adult subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2560–6.
    1. Leeds JM, Fenneteau F, Gosselin NH, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling to determine the dose of ST-246 to protect against smallpox in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1136–43.
    1. Jordan R, Tien D, Bolken TC, et al. Single-dose safety and pharmacokinetics of ST-246, a novel orthopoxvirus egress inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1721–7.
    1. Guidance for Industry. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; Oct, 2015. Product development under the animal rule.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren