Endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer leads to improved survival rates: results from a population-based study

Sachin Wani, Ananya Das, Amit Rastogi, Jennifer Drahos, Winifred Ricker, Ruth Parsons, Ajay Bansal, Roy Yen, Lindsay Hosford, Meghan Jankowski, Prateek Sharma, Michael B Cook, Sachin Wani, Ananya Das, Amit Rastogi, Jennifer Drahos, Winifred Ricker, Ruth Parsons, Ajay Bansal, Roy Yen, Lindsay Hosford, Meghan Jankowski, Prateek Sharma, Michael B Cook

Abstract

Background: The advantages of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT)-positron emission tomography (PET) with respect to survival for esophageal cancer patients are unclear. This study aimed to assess the effects of EUS, CT-PET, and their combination on overall survival with respect to cases not receiving these procedures.

Methods: Patients who were ≥66 years old when diagnosed with esophageal cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. Cases were split into 4 analytic groups: EUS only (n = 318), CT-PET only (n = 853), EUS+CT-PET (n = 189), and no EUS or CT-PET (n = 2439). Survival times were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test for each group versus the no EUS or CT-PET group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates.

Results: Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that EUS, CT-PET, and EUS+CT-PET patients had improved survival for all stages (with the exception of stage 0 disease) in comparison with patients undergoing no EUS or CT-PET. Receipt of EUS increased the likelihood of receiving endoscopic therapies, esophagectomy, and chemoradiation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that receipt of EUS was a significant predictor of improved 1- (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.59; P < .0001), 3- (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.66; P < .0001), and 5-year survival (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68). Similar results were noted when the results were stratified on the basis of histology and for the CT-PET and EUS+CT-PET groups.

Conclusions: Receipt of either EUS or CT-PET alone in esophageal cancer patients was associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. Future studies should identify barriers to the dissemination of these staging modalities.

Keywords: endoscopic ultrasonography; endoscopic ultrasound; esophageal cancer; positron emission tomography and computed tomography; staging; survival.

© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier’s estimate in EUS and no EUS groups

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren