The Children and Young People's Health Partnership Evelina London Model of Care: process evaluation protocol

Rose-Marie Satherley, Judith Green, Nick Sevdalis, James Joseph Newham, Mohamed Elsherbiny, Julia Forman, Ingrid Wolfe, Raghu Lingam, CYPHP team, Rose-Marie Satherley, Judith Green, Nick Sevdalis, James Joseph Newham, Mohamed Elsherbiny, Julia Forman, Ingrid Wolfe, Raghu Lingam, CYPHP team

Abstract

Introduction: Children and young people (CYP) in the UK have poor health outcomes, and there is increasing emergency department and hospital outpatient use. To address these problems in Lambeth and Southwark (two boroughs of London, UK), the local Clinical Commissioning Groups, Local Authorities and Healthcare Providers formed The Children and Young People's Health Partnership (CYPHP), a clinical-academic programme for improving child health. The Partnership has developed the CYPHP Evelina London model, an integrated healthcare model that aims to deliver effective, coordinated care in primary and community settings and promote better self-management to over approximately 90 000 CYP in Lambeth and Southwark. This protocol is for the process evaluation of this model of care.

Methods and analysis: Alongside an impact evaluation, an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation will be used to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing the model of care. The data collected mapped onto a logic model of how CYPHP is expected to improve child health outcomes. Data collection and analysis include qualitative interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, a policy review and a quantitative analysis of routine clinical and administrative data and questionnaire data. Information relating to the context of the trial that may affect implementation and/or outcomes of the CYPHP model of care will be documented.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been reviewed by NHS REC Cornwall & Plymouth (17/SW/0275). The findings of this process evaluation will guide the scaling up and implementation of the CYPHP Evelina London Model of Care across the UK. Findings will be disseminated through publications and conferences, and implementation manuals and guidance for others working to improve child health through strengthening health systems.

Trial registration number: NCT03461848.

Keywords: child health; integrated care; process evaluation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical Framework for the CYPHP Evelina London Model of Care; [x] represents process indicators which are detailed in table 1. The CYPHP Evelina London Model of Care provides numerous universal and targeted services; the interventions described here are provided as an example and are not exhaustive. CYP, children and young people; CYPHP, The Children and Young People’s Health Partnership.

References

    1. Wolfe I, Mandeville K, Harrison K, et al. . Child survival in England: strengthening governance for health. Health Policy 2017;121:1131–8. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.004
    1. Viner RM. State of child health: report. London: Royal College of Paediatrics & Child Health, 2017.
    1. Wolfe I, Cass H, Thompson MJ, et al. . Improving child health services in the UK: insights from Europe and their implications for the NHS reforms. BMJ 2011;342:d1277 10.1136/bmj.d1277
    1. Were WM, Daelmans B, Bhutta Z, et al. . Children’s health priorities and interventions. BMJ 2015;351:h4300 10.1136/bmj.h4300
    1. Wolfe I, Thompson M, Gill P, et al. . Health services for children in western Europe. Lancet 2013;381:1224–34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62085-6
    1. Mansfield A. BMA board of Science. Growing up in the UK: ensuring a healthy future for our children BMA. 2013. (Accessed 15 Oct 2018).
    1. Viner RM, Blackburn F, White F, et al. . The impact of out-of-hospital models of care on paediatric emergency department presentations. Arch Dis Child 2018;103:128–36. 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313307
    1. Newham JJ, Forman JR, Heys M, et al. . The Children and Young People’s Health Partnership (CYPHP) Evelina London Model of Care: Protocol for an opportunistic cluster randomised evaluation (cRCT) to assess child health outcomes, healthcare quality and health service use. BMJ Open 2019.
    1. World Health Organisation. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. . Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:26–33. 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. . Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258 10.1136/bmj.h1258
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, et al. . Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2006;332:413–6. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413
    1. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview : Linnan L, Steckler A, Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002:2–24.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1322–7. 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
    1. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, et al. . What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof 2013;36:44–66. 10.1177/0163278712446066
    1. Finch TL, Girling M, May CR, et al. . Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT). BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:135 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x
    1. Coad J. Using art-based techniques in engaging children and young people in health care consultations and/or research. Journal of Research in Nursing 2007;12:487–97. 10.1177/1744987107081250
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. . Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2010;8:63 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63
    1. Mansfield A. BMA board of Science. Growing up in the UK: ensuring a healthy future for our children BMA. 2013.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren