NET-02 trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised, parallel group, open-label, phase II, single-stage selection trial of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)

Zoe Craig, Jayne Swain, Emma Batman, Jonathan Wadsley, Nicholas Reed, Olusola Faluyi, Judith Cave, Rohini Sharma, Ian Chau, Lucy Wall, Angela Lamarca, R Hubner, Wasat Mansoor, Debashis Sarker, Tim Meyer, David A Cairns, Helen Howard, Juan W Valle, Mairéad G McNamara, Zoe Craig, Jayne Swain, Emma Batman, Jonathan Wadsley, Nicholas Reed, Olusola Faluyi, Judith Cave, Rohini Sharma, Ian Chau, Lucy Wall, Angela Lamarca, R Hubner, Wasat Mansoor, Debashis Sarker, Tim Meyer, David A Cairns, Helen Howard, Juan W Valle, Mairéad G McNamara

Abstract

Introduction: Poorly differentiated (PD), extrapulmonary (EP), neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare but aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. First-line treatment for advanced disease is an etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy combination. There is no established second-line treatment for patients with PD-EP-NEC, and this is an area of unmet need.

Methods and analysis: NET-02 is a UK, multicentre, randomised (1:1), parallel group, open-label, phase II, single-stage selection trial of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive PD-EP-NEC. One hundred and two eligible participants will be randomised to receive either nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid or docetaxel. The primary objective is to determine the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary objectives of this study are to determine PFS, overall survival, objective response rate, toxicity, quality of life and whether neuron-specific enolase is predictive of treatment response. If either treatment is found to have a 6-month PFS rate of at least 25%, that treatment will be considered for a phase III trial. If both treatments meet this target, prespecified selection criteria will be applied to establish which treatment to take forward.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has ethical approval from the Greater Manchester Central Research Ethics Committee (reference no. 18/NW/0031) and clinical trial authorisation from the Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and uploaded to the European Union Clinical Trials Register.

Trial registration numbers: ISRCTN10996604, NCT03837977, EudraCT Number: 2017-002453-11.

Keywords: docetaxel; liposomal irinotecan; neuroendocrine carcinoma; randomised; single-stage.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JW reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from SanofiGenzyme, personal fees and non-financial support from Celgene, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees and non-financial support from Ipsen, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, non-financial support from Imaging Equipment, outside the submitted work. IC reports advisory role for Eli-Lilly, Bristol Meyers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Roche, Merck-Serono, Five Prime Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Oncologie International, Pierre Fabre; research funding from EliLilly, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi Oncology, Merck-Serono; honorarium from Eli-Lilly. AL received travel and educational support from Ipsen, Pfizer, Bayer, AAA, Sirtex Medical, Novartis, Mylan and Delcath Systems; speaker honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen and Incyte; advisory honoraria from EISAI and Nutricia; she is a member of the Knowledge Network and NETConnect Initiatives funded by Ipsen. DS reports personal fees from MSD, personal fees and non-financial support from EISAI, personal fees and non-financial support from Ipsen, personal fees from Bayer, non-financial support from Mina Therapeutics, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. TM reports grants from Bayer, grants from BTG, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from EISAI, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Tarveda, personal fees from Ipsen, personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work. DAC reports grants and non-financial support from Servier, during the conduct of the study. HH reports grants and non-financial support from Servier, during the conduct of the study. JWV reports Consulting or Advisory role for Ipsen, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Merck, Delcath Systems, Agios, Pfizer, PCI Biotech, Incyte, Keocyt, QED, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Genoscience Pharma, Mundipharma EDO; Honoraria from Ipsen; and Speakers’ Bureau for Novartis, Ipsen, NuCana and Imaging Equipment. MGM has received research grant support from Servier, Ipsen and NuCana. She has received travel and accommodation support from Bayer and Ipsen and speaker honoraria from Pfizer, Ipsen and NuCana. She has served on advisory boards for Celgene, Ipsen, Sirtex and Baxalta.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial schema. ECOG, Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group; EP, extrapulmonary; EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma; nal-IRI, liposomal irinotecan; PD, poorly differentiated.

References

    1. Leoncini E, Boffetta P, Shafir M, et al. . Increased incidence trend of low-grade and high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocrine 2017;58:368–79. 10.1007/s12020-017-1273-x
    1. Dasari A, Mehta K, Byers LA, et al. . Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: a SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases. Cancer 2018;124:807–15. 10.1002/cncr.31124
    1. Korse CM, Taal BG, van Velthuysen M-LF, et al. . Incidence and survival of neuroendocrine tumours in the Netherlands according to histological grade: experience of two decades of cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1975–83. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.022
    1. Brenner B, Tang LH, Shia J, et al. . Small cell carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: clinicopathological features and treatment approach. Semin Oncol 2007;34:43–50. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.10.022
    1. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, et al. . Who classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th edition WHO Press, 2010.
    1. Moertel CG, Kvols LK, O'Connell MJ, et al. . Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms. Cancer 1991;68:227–32. 10.1002/1097-0142(19910715)68:2<227::AID-CNCR2820680202>;2-I
    1. Hentic O, Hammel P, Couvelard A, et al. . Folfiri regimen: an effective second-line chemotherapy after failure of etoposide–platinum combination in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas grade 3. Endocr Relat Cancer 2012;19:751–7. 10.1530/ERC-12-0002
    1. Welin S, Sorbye H, Sebjornsen S, et al. . Clinical effect of temozolomide-based chemotherapy in poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Cancer 2011;117:4617–22. 10.1002/cncr.26124
    1. Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. . Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (who G3): the Nordic NEC study. Ann Oncol 2013;24:152–60. 10.1093/annonc/mds276
    1. Hadoux J, Guigay J, Malka D, et al. . Oxaliplatin-Based chemotherapy for grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. European Neuro Endocrine Tumour Society 2013:Abstract J2.
    1. Olsen IH, Knigge U, Federspiel B, et al. . Topotecan monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with progressive advanced stage neuroendocrine carcinomas. J Cancer 2014;5:628–32. 10.7150/jca.9409
    1. Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, et al. . Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer 2015;22:657–64. 10.1530/ERC-15-0119
    1. Olsen IH, Sørensen JB, Federspiel B, et al. . Temozolomide as second or third line treatment of patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:1–4. 10.1100/2012/170496
    1. Yamaguchi T, Machida N, Morizane C, et al. . Multicenter retrospective analysis of systemic chemotherapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system. Cancer Sci 2014;105:1176–81. 10.1111/cas.12473
    1. McNamara MG, Frizziero M, Jacobs T, et al. . Second-Line treatment in patients (PTS) with advanced extra-pulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-PD-NEC): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroendocrinology 2019;108:1–273.
    1. Irinotecan hydrochloride summary of product characteristics. Available: [Accessed 23 March 2016].
    1. ONIVYDE 5 mg/ml concentrate for solution for infusion summary of product characteristics. Available: [Accessed 01 July 2019].
    1. Camptosar (irinotecan) U.S. package insert. Available: [Accessed 23 March 2016].
    1. Baker JHE, Lam J, Kyle AH, et al. . Irinophore C, a novel nanoformulation of irinotecan, alters tumor vascular function and enhances the distribution of 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin. Clinical Cancer Research 2008;14:7260–71. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0736
    1. Verreault M, Strutt D, Masin D, et al. . Vascular normalization in orthotopic glioblastoma following intravenous treatment with lipid-based nanoparticulate formulations of irinotecan (Irinophore C™), doxorubicin (Caelyx®) or vincristine. BMC Cancer 2011;11:124 10.1186/1471-2407-11-124
    1. Chiang N-J, Chao T-Y, Hsieh R-K, et al. . A phase I dose-escalation study of PEP02 (irinotecan liposome injection) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced solid tumors. BMC Cancer 2016;16:907 10.1186/s12885-016-2933-6
    1. Chen L-T, Von Hoff DD, Li C-P, et al. . Expanded analyses of napoli-1: phase 3 study of MM-398 (nal-IRI), with or without 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015;33:234–34. 10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.234
    1. NCCN guidelines: small cell lung cancer. Available: [Accessed 05 Aug 2019].
    1. NCCN guidelines: non-small cell lung cancer. Available: [Accessed 09 Sep 2019].
    1. Fossella FV. Docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncology 2002;16:45–51.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Groenvold M, Klee MC, Sprangers MAG, et al. . Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:441–50. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00428-3
    1. Yadegarfar G, Friend L, Jones L, et al. . Validation of the EORTC QLQ-GINET21 questionnaire for assessing quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Cancer 2013;108:301–10. 10.1038/bjc.2012.560
    1. Simon R, Wittes RE, Ellenberg SS. Randomized phase II clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 1985;69:1375–81.
    1. A'Hern RP. Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med 2001;20:859–66. 10.1002/sim.721
    1. Consolidated standards of reporting trials guidelines. Available: [Accessed 07 Dec 2018].
    1. International Committee of medical Journal editors: defining the role of authors and contributors. Available: [Accessed 02 Jul 2019].
    1. Information Commissioner's Office Guide to the general data protection regulation (GDPR). Available: [Accessed 02 Jul 2019].

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren