Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Trial Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Qianyan Liu, Xiaoliang Wu, Jing Guo, Jie Gao, Bingyang Liu, Yuhang Wang, Minghui Xia, Lixia Pei, Jianhua Sun, Qianyan Liu, Xiaoliang Wu, Jing Guo, Jie Gao, Bingyang Liu, Yuhang Wang, Minghui Xia, Lixia Pei, Jianhua Sun

Abstract

Introduction: The chronic neuropathic pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) can last for several months or even many years, seriously affecting the affected person's work, sleep, mood, and daily life activities. In generaly, current treatments for PHN are at best limited and unsatisfactory, and adverse reactions are common, especially in elderly patients. Electroacupuncture (EA) is widely used clinically to manage painful diseases, but there remains a lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of EA on PHN. This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of EA on PHN, and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for EA treatment of PHN.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial will recruit 448 patients with PHN at seven clinical centers. Multicenter stratified variable block randomization will be used, and the eligible patients will be randomly allocated in a ratio of 1:1 to the EA group or sham EA group. The EA group will receive 4 weeks of EA treatment, given as 30-min treatment sessions, once daily, 5 times per week, for a total of 20 treatments; the sham EA group will receive sham EA treatment under the same conditions.

Planned outcomes: The primary outcome measure is the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale pain score at week 4. The secondary outcome measures, including mechanical pain threshold, pain area of PHN, average number of pain episodes, the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2, Zoster Brief Pain Inventory, the Depression, Anxiety, and Positive Outlook Scale, Patient Global Impression of Change, safety of EA, and use of concomitant medications, among others. The primary analysis of the outcomes will be the mixed-effect model with repeated measurement between groups on an intent-to-treat population.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04560361. Registered 23 September 2020 ( https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04560361?term=NCT04560361&draw=2&rank=1 ).

Keywords: Analgesic effect; Electroacupuncture; Postherpetic neuralgia; Randomized controlled trial; Trial protocol.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. Screening and randomization will be performed based on an average daily pain score of ≥ 4, assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) during the observation period. Electroacupuncture treatment arms are shown in orange and gray. Patients will be followed up for 1 month after treatment. Asterisk: The washout period is required only for specific patients, namely, those currently receiving or having received > 1 permitted concomitant medication or any prohibited concomitant medications and treatments listed in sectionConcomitant Medications for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia within 14 days; for these patients, a washout period of > 7 days (depending on the half-life of the medications) is required after informed consent
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram of patient enrollment. The yellow dotted box indicates that patients who meet the standards of concomitant medications do not require a washout period and can directly enter the observation period. EA Electroacupuncture, PHN postherpetic neuralgia, SEA sham electroacupuncture
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Location of acupoints in the study, and acupuncture procedure for the EA and SEA groups. a Disposable acupuncture needles (size 0.30 × 40 mm). b Placebo blunt needles (size 0.40 × 13 mm). c Insulating adhesive pads. d Location of ipsilateral (PHN-affected side) acupoints in the study. For example, for PHN in the left lumbar, choose the Zhigou (SJ6), Yanglingquan (GB34), and Ashi points on the left side for the EA treatment; refer to the same location on the right. d′ Enlarged view of the location of Ashi points. Every 2- to 3-cm interval around the painful area of PHN is used as an acupuncture point, with the needle pointed towards the painful area. e Operating diagram of inserting needle vertically into the Zhigou and Yanglingquan points in the EA group. f Operating diagram of inserting needle obliquely (at an angle of 30°–45°) into the Ashi points in the EA group. g Operating diagram of inserting needle vertically into the Zhigou and Yanglingquan points in the SEA group. h Operating diagram of inserting needle obliquely (at an angle of 30°–45°) into the Ashi points in the SEA group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schedule of study procedures. MPT Mechanical pain threshold, ANPE average number of pain episodes, ADEPE average duration of each pain episode, SF-MPQ-2 short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2, ZBPI Zoster Brief Pain Inventory, APOS Depression, Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale, PGIC Patient Global Impression of Change, SEA safety of electroacupuncture

References

    1. Johnson RW, Rice AS. Clinical practice. Postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1526–1533.
    1. van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain. 2014;155(4):654–662.
    1. Guthmiller CGKB. Postherpetic neuralgia. StatPearls. 2020. .
    1. Cohen JI. Clinical practice: Herpes zoster. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):255–263.
    1. John AR, Canaday DH. Herpes zoster in the older adult. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31(4):811–826.
    1. Werner RN, Nikkels AF, Marinovic B, et al. European consensus-based (S2k) guideline on the management of Herpes Zoster—guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), part 2: treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(1):20–29.
    1. Johnson RW. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010;9(3 Suppl.):21–26.
    1. Devor M. Rethinking the causes of pain in herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: the ectopic pacemaker hypothesis. Pain Rep. 2018;3(6):e702.
    1. Putri Mellaratna W, Jusuf NK, Yosi A. The impact of pain intensity on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia patients. Med Glas (Zenica) 2020;17(2):439–444.
    1. Wu CHLZ, Zhao Y, Gao Y, et al. Electroacupuncture improves thermal and mechanical sensitivities in a rat model of postherpetic neuralgia. Mol Pain. 2013;9:18.
    1. Li W, Peng W, Zhou J, Liu Z. Acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11):e005725.
    1. Coyle ME, Liang H, Wang K, et al. Acupuncture plus moxibustion for herpes zoster: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dermatol Ther. 2017;30(4). 10.1111/dth.12468.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.
    1. Agha RA, Altman DG, Rosin D. The SPIRIT 2013 statement-defining standard protocol items for trials. Int J Surg. 2015;13:288–291.
    1. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013318.
    1. Werner RN, Nikkels AF, Marinovic B, et al. European consensus-based (S2k) guideline on the management of Herpes Zoster—guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), part 1: diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(1):9–19.
    1. Gross GE, Eisert L, Doerr HW, et al. S2k guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020;18(1):55–78.
    1. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(6):1073–1093.
    1. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S240–S252.
    1. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152(10):2399–2404.
    1. Yamanishi R, Uchino M, Kawashima M, Dogru M, Matsuguma S, Tsubota K. Analysis of the association between the severity of ocular and systemic pain. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(3):434–439.
    1. Chu LF, Cun T, Ngai LK, et al. Modulation of remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia by the beta-blocker propranolol in humans. Pain. 2012;153(5):974–981.
    1. Breen SP, Etter NM, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. Oral somatosensatory acuity is related to particle size perception in chocolate. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7437.
    1. Pickering G, Voute M, Macian N, Ganry H, Pereira B. Effectiveness and safety of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster on localized neuropathic pain after knee surgery: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Pain. 2019;160(5):1186–1195.
    1. Song JW, Lee YW, Yoon KB, Park SJ, Shim YH. Magnesium sulfate prevents remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(2):390–397.
    1. Martin E, Narjoz C, Decleves X, et al. Dextromethorphan analgesia in a human experimental model of hyperalgesia. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(2):356–368.
    1. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(17):1098.
    1. Redlarski G, Palkowski A, Krawczuk M. Body surface area formulae: an alarming ambiguity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27966.
    1. Mance M, Prutki M, Dujmovic A, Milosevic M, Vrbanovic-Mijatovic V, Mijatovic D. Changes in total body surface area and the distribution of skin surfaces in relation to body mass index. Burns. 2020;46(4):868–875.
    1. Maarbjerg S, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Trigeminal neuralgia—a prospective systematic study of clinical characteristics in 158 patients. Headache. 2014;54(10):1574–1582.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Trudeau JJ, et al. Validation of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in acute low back pain. J Pain. 2015;16(4):357–366.
    1. Buppha P, Tontisirin N. Reliability and validity of the Thai Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2). J Anesth Clin Res. 2016;7(8). 10.4172/2155-6148.1000650.
    1. Lovejoy TI, Turk DC, Morasco BJ. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the revised short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. J Pain. 2012;13(12):1250–1257.
    1. Gauthier LR, Young A, Dworkin RH, et al. Validation of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire-2 in younger and older people with cancer pain. J Pain. 2014;15(7):756–770.
    1. Maruo TNA, Maeda L, Shi K, et al. Validity, reliability, and assessment sensitivity of the Japanese version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 in Japanese patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. Pain Med. 2014;15:1930–1937.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) Pain. 2009;144(1–2):35–42.
    1. Coplan PM, Schmader K, Nikas A, et al. Development of a measure of the burden of pain due to herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia for prevention trials: adaptation of the brief pain inventory. J Pain. 2004;5(6):344–356.
    1. Pincus T, Williams AC, Vogel S, Field A. The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS) Pain. 2004;109(1–2):181–188.
    1. Rice ASC, Dworkin RH, McCarthy TD, et al. EMA401, an orally administered highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist, as a novel treatment for postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9929):1637–1647.
    1. Shkirkova K, Schuberg S, Balouzian E, et al. Paramedic global impression of change during prehospital evaluation and transport for acute stroke. Stroke. 2020;51(3):784–791.
    1. Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Berdan LG, et al. Good clinical practice guidance and pragmatic clinical trials: balancing the best of both worlds. Circulation. 2016;133(9):872–880.
    1. Hershman DL, Unger JM, Greenlee H, et al. Effect of acupuncture vs sham acupuncture or waitlist control on joint pain related to aromatase inhibitors among women with early-stage breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(2):167–176.
    1. He H. Treating chronic knee pain with acupuncture. JAMA. 2015;313:6.
    1. Vickers AJ, Linde K. Acupuncture for chronic pain. JAMA. 2014;311(9):955–956.
    1. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(19):1444–1453.
    1. Linde KSA, Jürgens S, Hoppe A, et al. Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293(17):2118–2125.
    1. Zhao L, Li D, Zheng H, et al. Acupuncture as adjunctive therapy for chronic stable angina: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1388–97.
    1. Marchant J. Acupuncture in cancer study reignites debate about controversial technique. Nature. 2017;552(7684):157–158.
    1. Yang JW, Wang LQ, Zou X, et al. Effect of acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(12):777–785.
    1. Wu XK, Stener-Victorin E, Kuang HY, et al. Effect of acupuncture and clomiphene in chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2502–2514.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren