Tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal seizures by concomitant antiseizure medication use: Pooled results from three phase 3 trials

Philippe Ryvlin, Svetlana Dimova, Sami Elmoufti, Florin Floricel, Cédric Laloyaux, Xavier Nondonfaz, Victor Biton, Philippe Ryvlin, Svetlana Dimova, Sami Elmoufti, Florin Floricel, Cédric Laloyaux, Xavier Nondonfaz, Victor Biton

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in patients on one or two concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and in patients on one specific concomitant ASM.

Methods: Post hoc analysis was made of double-blind trials (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, and N01358/NCT01261325) in adults with focal seizures randomized to BRV (50-200 mg/day; approved therapeutic dose range for adults) or placebo with concomitant ASM regimen unchanged throughout a 12-week evaluation period. Outcomes were analyzed in patients on one or two concomitant ASMs, and those on concomitant carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), or valproate (VPA) only.

Results: Patients randomized to BRV with one or two concomitant ASMs, respectively (n = 181/557), reported similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 68.0%/66.4%), drug-related TEAEs (41.4%/41.5%), and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (6.6%/5.4%). Respective values for patients randomized to placebo with one or two concomitant ASMs (n = 95/331) were 60.0%/60.7% (TEAEs), 32.6%/30.2% (drug-related TEAEs), and 2.1%/4.5% (TEAEs leading to discontinuation). The incidences of TEAEs, drug-related TEAEs, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation by specific concomitant ASM (CBZ, LTG, OXC, VPA) were similar to the overall incidences in patients taking one concomitant ASM. In patients on one or two concomitant ASMs, respectively, 50% responder rates were numerically higher on BRV (42.3%/36.8% [n = 175/511]) versus placebo (18.3%/19.5% [n = 93/298]). Patients with one or two ASMs on BRV (n = 175/509) versus placebo (n = 92/298) also had numerically higher 100% responder rates (BRV, 9.1%/4.5%; placebo, 1.1%/.3%) and seizure freedom (6.9%/3.7%; 1.1%/0). For patients taking concomitant CBZ, LTG, OXC, or VPA, efficacy was numerically higher with BRV (n = 54/30/27/27) versus placebo (n = 34/13/10/14-15; 50% responder rates: BRV, 31.5%/30.0%/40.7%/70.4%; placebo, 17.6%/7.7%/20.0%/33.3%; 100% responder rates: BRV, 5.6%/10.0%/11.1%/11.1%; placebo, 0 for all; seizure freedom: BRV, 3.7%/6.7%/7.4%/11.1%; placebo, 0 for all).

Significance: Therapeutic doses of BRV were efficacious and well tolerated regardless of the number of concomitant ASMs (one or two) or specific concomitant ASM (CBZ, LTG, OXC, VPA).

Keywords: antiepileptic drug; epilepsy; randomized controlled trials; safety.

Conflict of interest statement

P.R. has received speaker or consultant fees from Arvelle Therapeutics, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, LivaNova, and UCB Pharma. S.D., S.E., F.F., C.L., and X.N. are salaried employees of UCB Pharma and receive stock or stock options from their employment. V.B. has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

© 2022 UCB Pharma. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overall incidence of (A) treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) classified as psychiatric disorders and (B) TEAEs potentially associated with behavioral disorders by number of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and specific concomitant ASMs in patients on one concomitant ASM (patients received placebo or brivaracetam [BRV] in addition to a single concomitant ASM; safety set). CBZ, carbamazepine; LTG, lamotrigine; OXC, oxcarbazepine; VPA, valproate.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Efficacy outcomes by number of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and specific concomitant ASMs in patients on one concomitant ASM (patients received placebo or brivaracetam [BRV] in addition to a single concomitant ASM; intent‐to‐treat). (A) Fifty percent responder rate in focal seizures. (B) One hundred percent responder rate in focal seizures. (C) Seizure freedom (all seizure types). Patients were defined as having a 100% responder rate if they had a 100% reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency. Patients were classified as seizure‐free if they did not report any seizure (any type, including focal seizures, generalized seizures, and unclassified seizures), and had completed their seizure diary for at least 90% of days during the treatment period and did not discontinue during the treatment period. Three patients were excluded from the 100% responder rate and seizure freedom analyses because the only seizures they reported occurred on the first day of the 100% responder rate seizure analysis period, which was 1 day before the seizure freedom analysis period commenced. CBZ, carbamazepine; LTG, lamotrigine; OXC, oxcarbazepine; VPA, valproate.

References

    1. Gillard M, Fuks B, Leclercq K, Matagne A. Binding characteristics of brivaracetam, a selective, high affinity SV2A ligand in rat, mouse and human brain: relationship to anti‐convulsant properties. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;664:36–44.
    1. Matagne A, Margineanu D‐G, Kenda B, Michel P, Klitgaard H. Anti‐convulsive and anti‐epileptic properties of brivaracetam (ucb 34714), a high‐affinity ligand for the synaptic vesicle protein, SV2A. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154:1662–71.
    1. UCB, Smyrna, GA, USA . Briviact® US prescribing information. 2021. Available from: . Accessed September 1, 2021
    1. UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium . Briviact® summary of product characteristics. 2020. Available from: . Accessed September 1, 2021.
    1. Ryvlin P, Werhahn KJ, Blaszczyk B, Johnson ME, Lu S. Adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy: results from a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2014;55:47–56.
    1. Biton V, Berkovic SF, Abou‐Khalil B, Sperling MR, Johnson ME, Lu S. Brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled partial epilepsy in adults: a phase III randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2014;55:57–66.
    1. Klein P, Schiemann J, Sperling MR, Whitesides J, Liang W, Stalvey T, et al. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter, parallel‐group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam in adult patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2015;56:1890–8.
    1. Alsfouk BAA, Brodie MJ, Walters M, Kwan P, Chen Z. Tolerability of antiseizure medications in individuals with newly diagnosed epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:574–81.
    1. Klein P, McLachlan R, Foris K, Nondonfaz X, Elmoufti S, Dimova S, et al. Effect of lifetime antiepileptic drug treatment history on efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal seizures: post‐hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Epilepsy Res. 2020;167:106369.
    1. Brandt C, Klein P, Badalamenti V, Gasalla T, Whitesides J. Safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in epilepsy: in‐depth pooled analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;103:106864.
    1. Perucca P, Gilliam FG. Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:792–802.
    1. Zaccara G, Giovannelli F, Giorgi FS, Franco V, Gasparini S, Benedetto U. Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta‐analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73:811–7.
    1. Trinka E, Tsong W, Toupin S, Patten A, Wilson K, Isojarvi J, et al. A systematic review and indirect treatment comparison of perampanel versus brivaracetam as adjunctive therapy in patients with focal‐onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Epilepsy Res. 2020;166:106403.
    1. Lattanzi S, Trinka E, Zaccara G, Striano P, Russo E, Del Giovane C, et al. Third‐generation antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal‐onset seizures in adults: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Drugs. 2022;82:199–218.
    1. Ben‐Menachem E, Mameniškienė R, Quarato PP, Klein P, Gamage J, Schiemann J, et al. Efficacy and safety of brivaracetam for partial‐onset seizures in 3 pooled clinical studies. Neurology. 2016;87:314–23.
    1. Benbadis S, Klein P, Schiemann J, Diaz A, Elmoufti S, Whitesides J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam with concomitant lamotrigine or concomitant topiramate in pooled phase III randomized, double‐blind trials: a post‐hoc analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;80:129–34.
    1. Brodie MJ, Fakhoury T, McDonough B, Colson AO, Stockis A, Elmoufti S, et al. Brivaracetam‐induced elevation of carbamazepine epoxide levels: a post‐hoc analysis from the clinical development program. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:55–62.
    1. Chen B, Choi H, Hirsch LJ, Katz A, Legge A, Buchsbaum R, et al. Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;76:24–31.
    1. Lattanzi S, Canafoglia L, Canevini MP, Casciato S, Chiesa V, Dainese F, et al. Adjunctive brivaracetam in focal epilepsy: real‐world evidence from the BRIVAracetam add‐on First Italian netwoRk STudy (BRIVAFIRST). CNS Drugs. 2021;35:1289–301.
    1. Steinig I, von Podewils F, Moddel G, Bauer S, Klein KM, Paule E, et al. Postmarketing experience with brivaracetam in the treatment of epilepsies: a multicenter cohort study from Germany. Epilepsia. 2017;58:1208–16.
    1. Strzelczyk A, Zaveta C, von Podewils F, Moddel G, Langenbruch L, Kovac S, et al. Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: a longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up. Epilepsia. 2021;62:2994–3004.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren