Value of History, Physical Examination, and Radiographic Findings in the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Meniscal Tear Among Middle-Aged Subjects With Knee Pain

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the utility of clinical history, radiographic findings, and physical examination findings in the diagnosis of symptomatic meniscal tear (SMT) in patients over age 45 years, in whom concomitant osteoarthritis is prevalent.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study of patients from 2 orthopedic surgeons' clinics, we assessed clinical history, physical examination findings, and radiographic findings in patients age >45 years with knee pain. The orthopedic surgeons rated their confidence that subjects' symptoms were due to meniscal tear; we defined the diagnosis of SMT as at least 70% confidence. We used logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with diagnosis of SMT, and we used the regression results to construct an index of the likelihood of SMT.

Results: In 174 participants, 6 findings were associated independently with the expert clinician having ≥70% confidence that symptoms were due to meniscal tear: localized pain, ability to fully bend the knee, pain duration <1 year, lack of varus alignment, lack of pes planus, and absence of joint space narrowing on radiographs. The index identified a low-risk group with 3% likelihood of SMT.

Conclusion: While clinicians traditionally rely upon mechanical symptoms in this diagnostic setting, our findings did not support the conclusion that mechanical symptoms were associated with the expert's confidence that symptoms were due to meniscal tear. An index that includes history of localized pain, full flexion, duration <1 year, pes planus, varus alignment, and joint space narrowing can be used to stratify patients according to their risk of SMT, and it identifies a subgroup with very low risk.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest statement: Dr. Wright reports receiving consulting fees and royalties from DePuy Orthopedics, a Johnson & Johnson Company. The remaining authors have no conflicts to report.

© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1

This figure depicts the flow of subjects through screening and enrollment. 2,315 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 1,106 were deemed eligible for the study. Of the eligible patients who agreed to participate, 193 completed both the questionnaire and musculoskeletal exam. Of these, 19 did not have radiographs available for review, leaving 174 included in the analyses presented here.

Figure 2

The proportion of subjects in whom the expert clinician indicated ≥70% confidence in the diagnosis of symptomatic meniscal tear is shown for each index score category. Higher index scores were associated with a greater likelihood that the clinician had ≥70% confidence that the symptoms were due to meniscal tear.