Repeatability and Reproducibility of Noninvasive Keratograph 5M Measurements in Patients with Dry Eye Disease

Lei Tian, Jing-Hao Qu, Xiao-Yu Zhang, Xu-Guang Sun, Lei Tian, Jing-Hao Qu, Xiao-Yu Zhang, Xu-Guang Sun

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the intraexaminer repeatability and interexaminer reproducibility of tear meniscus height (TMH) and noninvasive Keratograph tear breakup time (NIKBUT) measurements obtained with the Keratograph 5M (K5M) in a sample of healthy and dry eye populations. Methods. Forty-two patients with dry eye disease (DED group) and 42 healthy subjects (healthy group) were recruited in this prospective study. In all subjects, each eye received 3 consecutive measurements using the K5M for the TMH and NIKBUTs (NIKBUT-first and NIKBUT-average). And then a different examiner repeated the measurements. The repeatability and reproducibility of measurements were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results. The repeatability and reproducibility of TMH and NIKBUTs were good in both DED and healthy groups (CV% ≤ 26.1% and ICC ≥ 0.75 for all measurements). Patients with DED showed better intraexaminer repeatability for NIKBUTs, but worse for TMH than healthy subjects. Average TMH, NIKBUT-first, and NIKBUT-average were significantly lower in DED group than in healthy group (all P values < 0.05). Conclusions. Measurements of TMH and NIKBUTs obtained with the K5M may provide a simple, noninvasive screening test for dry eye with acceptable repeatability and reproducibility. The NIKBUTs were more reliable, but TMH was less reliable in patients with DED.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The representative outputs of TMH and NIKBUT. (a) The TMH was measured perpendicular to the lid margin at the central point relative to the pupil center. (b) NIKBUT result map included the color-coded map, breakup characteristics map, and first and average breakup time and classification.

References

    1. Lemp M. A., Foulks G. N. The definition and classification of dry eye disease. The Ocular Surface. 2007;5(2):75–92.
    1. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007) The Ocular Surface. 2007;5(2):93–107.
    1. Braun R. J., King-Smith P. E., Begley C. G., Li L., Gewecke N. R. Dynamics and function of the tear film in relation to the blink cycle. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2015;45:132–164. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.11.001.
    1. Szczesna D. H., Jaroński J., Kasprzak H. T., Stenevi U. Interferometric measurements of dynamic changes of tear film. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2006;11(3) doi: 10.1117/1.2209881.034028
    1. Bron A. J., Smith J. A., Calonge M. Methodologies to diagnose and monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007) The Ocular Surface. 2007;5(2):108–152.
    1. Phadatare S. P., Momin M., Nighojkar P., Askarkar S., Singh K. K. A comprehensive review on dry eye disease: diagnosis, medical management, recent developments, and future challenges. Advances in Pharmaceutics. 2015;2015:12. doi: 10.1155/2015/704946.704946
    1. Mengher L. S., Bron A. J., Tonge S. R., Gilbert D. J. A non-invasive instrument for clinical assessment of the pre-corneal tear film stability. Current Eye Research. 1985;4(1):1–7. doi: 10.3109/02713688508999960.
    1. Nichols K. K., Mitchell G. L., Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea. 2004;23(3):272–285. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200404000-00010.
    1. Holly F. J. Physical chemistry of the normal and disordered tear film. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom. 1985;104(4):374–380.
    1. Ibrahim O. M. A., Dogru M., Takano Y., et al. Application of visante optical coherence tomography tear meniscus height measurement in the diagnosis of dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(10):1923–1929. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.057.
    1. Altan-Yaycioglu R., Sizmaz S., Canan H., Coban-Karatas M. Optical coherence tomography for measuring the tear film meniscus: correlation with schirmer test and tear-film breakup time. Current Eye Research. 2013;38(7):736–742. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.774422.
    1. Koh S., Ikeda C., Watanabe S., et al. Effect of non-invasive tear stability assessment on tear meniscus height. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2015;93(2):e135–e139. doi: 10.1111/aos.12516.
    1. Abdelfattah N. S., Dastiridou A., Sadda S. R., Lee O. L. Noninvasive imaging of tear film dynamics in eyes with ocular surface disease. Cornea. 2015;34:S48–S52. doi: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000570.
    1. Arriola-Villalobos P., Fernández-Vigo J. I., Díaz-Valle D., Peraza-Nieves J. E., Fernández-Pérez C., Benítez-Del-Castillo J. M. Assessment of lower tear meniscus measurements obtained with Keratograph and agreement with Fourier-domain optical-coherence tomography. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;99(8):1120–1125. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306453.
    1. Wang X., Lu X., Yang J., et al. Evaluation of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction in teenagers with myopia through noninvasive keratograph. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;2016:5. doi: 10.1155/2016/6761206.6761206
    1. Hong J., Sun X., Wei A., et al. Assessment of tear film stability in dry eye with a newly developed keratograph. Cornea. 2013;32(5):716–721. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182714425.
    1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Measurement error. British Medical Journal. 1996;312(7047):p. 1654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1654.
    1. Oliveira A. G. Biostatistics Decoded. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
    1. Ribelles A., Galbis-Estrada C., Parras M. A., Vivar-Llopis B., Marco-Ramírez C., Diaz-Llopis M. Ocular surface and tear film changes in older women working with computers. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:10. doi: 10.1155/2015/467039.467039
    1. Savini G., Prabhawasat P., Kojima T., Grueterich M., Espana E., Goto E. The challenge of dry eye diagnosis. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2008;2(1):31–55.
    1. McAlinden C., Khadka J., Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2011;31(4):330–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x.
    1. Cox S. M., Nichols K. K., Nichols J. J. Agreement between automated and traditional measures of tear film breakup. Optometry & Vision Science. 2015;92(9):e257–e263. doi: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000648.
    1. Koh S., Ikeda C., Fujimoto H., et al. Regional differences in tear film stability and meibomian glands in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye. Eye and Contact Lens. 2015 doi: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000191.
    1. Qiu X., Gong L., Sun X., Jin H. Age-related variations of human tear meniscus and diagnosis of dry eye with fourier-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2011;30(5):543–549. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181fb84ea.
    1. Cui L., Shen M., Wang J., et al. Age-related changes in tear menisci imaged by optical coherence tomography. Optometry & Vision Science. 2011;88(10):1214–1219. doi: 10.1097/opx.0b013e3182271297.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren