Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who are inadequate responders to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results through one year of a phase IIIb, randomised, controlled study (COSMOS)

Laura C Coates, Laure Gossec, Elke Theander, Paul Bergmans, Marlies Neuhold, Chetan S Karyekar, May Shawi, Wim Noël, Georg Schett, Iain B McInnes, Laura C Coates, Laure Gossec, Elke Theander, Paul Bergmans, Marlies Neuhold, Chetan S Karyekar, May Shawi, Wim Noël, Georg Schett, Iain B McInnes

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23p19-subunit antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with prior inadequate response (IR) to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).

Methods: Adults with active PsA (≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints) who discontinued ≤2 TNFi due to IR (lack of efficacy or intolerance) were randomised (2:1) to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg or placebo at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) through week 44. Patients receiving placebo crossed over to guselkumab at week 24. The primary (ACR20) and key secondary (change in HAQ-DI, ACR50, change in SF-36 PCS and PASI100) endpoints, at week 24, underwent fixed-sequence testing (two-sided α=0.05). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed through week 56.

Results: Among 285 participants (female (52%), one (88%) or two (12%) prior TNFi), 88% of 189 guselkumab and 86% of 96 placebo→guselkumab patients completed study agent through week 44. A statistically significantly higher proportion of patients receiving guselkumab (44.4%) than placebo (19.8%) achieved ACR20 (%difference (95% CI): 24.6 (14.1 to 35.2); multiplicity-adjusted p<0.001) at week 24. Guselkumab was superior to placebo for each key secondary endpoint (multiplicity-adjusted p<0.01). ACR20 response (non-responder imputation) in the guselkumab group was 58% at week 48; >80% of week 24 responders maintained response at week 48. Through week 24, serious AEs/serious infections occurred in 3.7%/0.5% of 189 guselkumab-randomised and 3.1%/0% of 96 placebo-randomised patients; the guselkumab safety profile was similar through week 56, with no deaths or opportunistic infections.

Conclusion: Guselkumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations and physical function in patients with TNFi-IR PsA. A favourable benefit-risk profile was demonstrated through 1 year.

Trial registration number: NCT03796858.

Keywords: arthritis; biological therapy; psoriatic; tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LCC has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Domain, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. LCC is funded by a National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist award. The work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. LG has received research grants from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB. ET is an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. PB, MN and WN are employed by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and own Johnson & Johnson stock and/or stock options. CSK is employed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and owns Johnson & Johnson stock and/or stock options. MS is employed by Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. GS has received speaker’s honoraria from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis and UCB. IBMcI has received research grants and/or honoraria (all <$10 000 per annum) from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition of patients through 1 year of COSMOS. EE, early escape; Q8W, every 8 weeks; TB, tuberculosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ACR20 response through week 48 of COSMOS. Proportions of randomised and treated patients achieving ACR20 response through week 24 in the Primary analysis (treatment failure rules applied) (A) and ACR20 response at week 24 across the Primary, PP and EE-correction analyses (B). After week 24, analyses were performed using non-responder imputation methods, including imputation of EE patients as non-responders (see Patients and methods). Results for the placebo→guselkumab group at week 48 are reported for patients who did not enter EE and crossed over to guselkumab at week 24. ACR20, ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria; EE, early escape; GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo; PP, per protocol; Q8W, every 8 weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ACR20 response at week 24 by baseline characteristics of COSMOS participants. ACR20, ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria; CRP, C reactive protein; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GUS, guselkumab; MTX, methotrexate; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PBO, placebo; Q8W, every 8 weeks; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Key secondary outcomes through week 48 of COSMOS. Primary analysis through week 24 and post hoc NRI analysis at week 48 of LSmean change and mean change in HAQ-DI score (A), ACR50 response (B), LSmean change and mean change in SF-36 PCS score (C), and PASI100 response (D). After week 24, analyses were performed using NRI (including imputation of EE patients as non-responders in the guselkumab group; see Patients and methods). Results for the placebo→guselkumab group at week 48 are reported for patients who did not enter EE and crossed over to guselkumab at week 24. ACR50, ≥50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria; GUS, guselkumab; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; LS, least squares; NRI, non-responder imputation; PASI100, 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PBO, placebo; Q8W, every 8 weeks; SF-36 PCS, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary.

References

    1. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. . Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1060–71. 10.1002/art.39573
    1. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:700–12. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159
    1. Mease P. A short history of biological therapy for psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015;33:S104–8.
    1. Glintborg B, Ostergaard M, Krogh NS, et al. . Clinical response, drug survival, and predictors thereof among 548 patients with psoriatic arthritis who switched tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor therapy: results from the Danish Nationwide DANBIO Registry. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1213–23. 10.1002/art.37876
    1. Harrold LR, Stolshek BS, Rebello S, et al. . Impact of prior biologic use on persistence of treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis enrolled in the US Corrona registry. Clin Rheumatol 2017;36:895–901. 10.1007/s10067-017-3593-x
    1. Saad AA, Ashcroft DM, Watson KD, et al. . Persistence with anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis: observational study from the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R52. 10.1186/ar2670
    1. Merola JF, Lockshin B, Mody EA. Switching biologics in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;47:29–37. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.02.001
    1. Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Boehncke W-H, et al. . Guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who were biologic-naive or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment (DISCOVER-1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1115–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30265-8
    1. Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. . Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1126–36. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30263-4
    1. Ocampo D V, Gladman D. Psoriatic arthritis. F1000Res 2019;8. 10.12688/f1000research.19144.1
    1. Healy PJ, Helliwell PS. Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:686–91. 10.1002/art.23568
    1. Gladman DD, Inman RD, Cook RJ, et al. . International spondyloarthritis interobserver reliability exercise—the INSPIRE study: II. Assessment of peripheral joints, enthesitis, and dactylitis. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1740–5.
    1. Gladman DD, Ziouzina O, Thavaneswaran A, et al. . Dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis: prevalence and response to therapy in the biologic era. J Rheumatol 2013;40:1357–9. 10.3899/jrheum.130163
    1. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, et al. . Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137–45. 10.1002/art.1780230202
    1. Langley RGB, Feldman SR, Nyirady J, et al. . The 5-point Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) scale: a modified tool for evaluating plaque psoriasis severity in clinical trials. J Dermatolog Treat 2015;26:23–31. 10.3109/09546634.2013.865009
    1. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis—oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica 1978;157:238–44. 10.1159/000250839
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
    1. Chandran V, Bhella S, Schentag C, et al. . Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:936–9. 10.1136/ard.2006.065763
    1. Blauvelt A, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, et al. . Long-term safety of guselkumab: results from the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials with up to 5 years of treatment. American Academy of Dermatology 2021.
    1. Ritchlin CT, Helliwell PS, Boehncke W-H, et al. . Guselkumab, an inhibitor of the IL-23p19 subunit, provides sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of a phase III randomised study of patients who were biologic-naïve or TNFα inhibitor-experienced. RMD Open 2021;7:e001457. 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001457
    1. McInnes IB, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. . Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19-specific monoclonal antibody, through one year in biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73:604–16. 10.1002/art.41553
    1. McInnes IB, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody specific to the p19-subunit of interleukin-23, through 2 years: results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in biologic-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis. EULAR, 2021.
    1. Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Tam L-S, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Rheumatology 2021;60:2109–21. 10.1093/rheumatology/keab119
    1. Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, et al. . Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1525–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1615977
    1. Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, et al. . Efficacy of subcutaneous secukinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis stratified by prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: results from the randomized placebo-controlled FUTURE 2 study. J Rheumatol 2016;43:1713–7. 10.3899/jrheum.160275
    1. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al. . Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;389:2317–27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31429-0
    1. Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, et al. . Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:990–9. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204655
    1. Højgaard P, Ballegaard C, Cordtz R, et al. . Gender differences in biologic treatment outcomes—a study of 1750 patients with psoriatic arthritis using Danish Health Care Registers. Rheumatology 2018;57:1651–60. 10.1093/rheumatology/key140
    1. Mulder MLM, Wenink MH, Vriezekolk JE. Being overweight is associated with not reaching low disease activity in women but not men with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology 2021. 10.1093/rheumatology/keab338

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren