Prophylactic treatment of breast implants with a solution of gentamicin, vancomycin and cefazolin antibiotics for women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (The BREAST-AB trial)

Mathilde Nejrup Hemmingsen, Andreas Larsen, Tim K Weltz, Mathias Ørholt, Sebastian Wiberg, Anne Karen Bennedsen, Camilla Bille, Lena Felicia Carstensen, Lisa Toft Jensen, Rikke Bredgaard, Vibeke Koudahl, Volker Jürgen Schmidt, Peter Vester-Glowinski, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Søren J Sørensen, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Tine Damsgaard, Mikkel Herly, Mathilde Nejrup Hemmingsen, Andreas Larsen, Tim K Weltz, Mathias Ørholt, Sebastian Wiberg, Anne Karen Bennedsen, Camilla Bille, Lena Felicia Carstensen, Lisa Toft Jensen, Rikke Bredgaard, Vibeke Koudahl, Volker Jürgen Schmidt, Peter Vester-Glowinski, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Søren J Sørensen, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Tine Damsgaard, Mikkel Herly

Abstract

Introduction: Periprosthetic infection is one of the most severe complications following implant-based breast reconstruction affecting 5%-10% of the women. Currently, many surgeons apply antibiotics locally on the breast implant to reduce the risk of postoperative infection, but no randomised, placebo-controlled trials have tested the treatment's efficacy.

Methods and analysis: The BREAST-AB trial (BREAST-AntiBiotics) is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of local treatment with gentamicin, vancomycin and cefazolin on breast implants in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. The trial drug consists of 80 mg gentamicin, 1 g vancomycin and 1 g cefazolin dissolved in 500 mL of isotonic saline. The placebo solution consists of 500 mL isotonic saline. The trial drug is used to wash the dissected tissue pocket and the breast implant prior to insertion. The primary outcome is all-cause explantation of the breast implant within 180 days after the breast reconstruction surgery. This excludes cases where the implant is replaced with a new permanent implant, for example, for cosmetic reasons. Key long-term outcomes include capsular contracture and quality of life. The trial started on 26 January 2021 and is currently recruiting.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of the Capital Region (H-20056592) on 1 January 2021 and the Danish Medicines Agency (2020070016) on 2 August 2020. The main paper will include the primary and secondary outcomes and will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number: NCT04731025.

Keywords: breast surgery; clinical trials; plastic & reconstructive surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the trial intervention. The trial drug contains 1000 mg vancomycin, 1000 mg cefazolin and 80 mg gentamicin dissolved in an infusion bag containing 500 mL of sterile isotonic saline. The placebo solution consists of 500 mL sterile isotonic saline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the trial design. The patients are randomised to antibiotic treatment or placebo applied directly onto the breast implant and in the dissected tissue pocket. Patients who undergo bilateral breast reconstruction are randomised to antibiotics on one side and placebo on the contralateral side. Patients who undergo unilateral breast reconstruction are randomised to either antibiotics or placebo.

References

    1. Eltahir Y, Werners LLCH, Dreise MM, et al. . Quality-Of-Life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:201e–9. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586a7
    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons . 2019 plastic surgery statistics report, 2019. Available:
    1. Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC, et al. . US FDA breast implant postapproval studies: long-term outcomes in 99,993 patients. Ann Surg 2019;269:30–6. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002990
    1. Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Alizadeh K, et al. . Ten-Year core study data for Sientra's food and drug Administration-approved round and shaped breast implants with cohesive silicone gel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:7S–19. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004350
    1. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, et al. . Ten-Year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical Form-Stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J 2015;35:145–55. 10.1093/asj/sju084
    1. Petersen A, Eftekhari ALB, Damsgaard TE. Immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective study with emphasis on complications and risk factors. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012;46:344–8. 10.3109/2000656X.2012.700025
    1. Dikmans REG, Negenborn VL, Bouman M-B, et al. . Two-Stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:251–8. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30668-4
    1. Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, et al. . Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1605–11. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000054768.14922.44
    1. Rieger UM, Mesina J, Kalbermatten DF, et al. . Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants. Br J Surg 2013;100:768–74. 10.1002/bjs.9084
    1. Benediktsson K, Perbeck L. Capsular contracture around saline-filled and textured subcutaneously-placed implants in irradiated and non-irradiated breast cancer patients: five years of monitoring of a prospective trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:27–34. 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.08.005
    1. Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ, et al. . Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:pp. 20S–28. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004351
    1. Chopra K, Gowda AU, McNichols CHL, et al. . Antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns in breast augmentation: a national survey of current practice. Ann Plast Surg 2017;78:629–32. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000942
    1. Yalanis GC, Liu E-W, Cheng H-T. Efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine irrigation in reducing the risk of capsular contracture in aesthetic breast augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:687–98. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001576
    1. Kenna DM, Irojah BB, Mudge K, et al. . Absorbable antibiotic beads prophylaxis in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:486e–92. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004203
    1. Nava MB, Catanuto G, Rocco N. Reply: role of mitomycin C in preventing capsular contracture in implant-based reconstructive breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:823e–4. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003851
    1. Hunsicker LM, Chavez-Abraham V, Berry C, et al. . Efficacy of Vancomycin-based continuous triple antibiotic irrigation in immediate, implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5:e1624. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001624
    1. Tutela JP, Duncan DP, Kelishadi SS, et al. . Continuous postoperative antibiotic irrigation via catheter system following immediate breast reconstruction. Eplasty 2015;15, :e49.
    1. Hidalgo DA, Sinno S. Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1142–50. 10.1097/01.prs.0000481110.31939.e4
    1. Lynch JM, Sebai ME, Rodriguez-Unda NA, et al. . Breast pocket irrigation with antibiotic solution at implant insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018;42:1179–86. 10.1007/s00266-018-1166-2
    1. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. . Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017;152:784–91. 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. Available:
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. . I. C. H. H. T. guideline, general considerations for clinical trials E8. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 1997.
    1. Adams WP, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:46S–52. 10.1097/01.prs.0000185671.51993.7e
    1. Olsen MA, Nickel KB, Fox IK, et al. . Comparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures. JAMA Surg 2017;152, :e172338. 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338
    1. Kalstrup J, Balslev Willert C, Brinch-Møller Weitemeyer M, et al. . Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: evaluation of complications and safety. Breast 2021;60:192–8. 10.1016/j.breast.2021.10.006
    1. TC “Gaynes H H, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, et al. . CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections,”. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:pp. 606–608.
    1. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. . Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:345–53. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010;11:32. 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
    1. Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C. Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine 2011;36:2084–8. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff2cb1
    1. White RR, Pitzer KD, Fader RC, et al. . Pharmacokinetics of topical and intravenous cefazolin in patients with clean surgical wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1773–9. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818d5899
    1. Campbell CA. The role of Triple-Antibiotic saline irrigation in breast implant surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2018;80:S398–402. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001345
    1. Retsinformation . Lov om et videnskabsetisk komitesystem og behandling af biomedicinske forskningsprojekter, 2003. Available: [Accessed 19 Apr 2021].

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren