Phase III Trial of Avelumab Maintenance After First-Line Induction Chemotherapy Versus Continuation of Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastric Cancers: Results From JAVELIN Gastric 100

Markus Moehler, Mikhail Dvorkin, Narikazu Boku, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Min-Hee Ryu, Alina S Muntean, Sara Lonardi, Marina Nechaeva, Arinilda C Bragagnoli, Hasan S Coşkun, Antonio Cubillo Gracian, Toshimi Takano, Rachel Wong, Howard Safran, Gina M Vaccaro, Zev A Wainberg, Matthew R Silver, Huiling Xiong, Janet Hong, Julien Taieb, Yung-Jue Bang, Markus Moehler, Mikhail Dvorkin, Narikazu Boku, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Min-Hee Ryu, Alina S Muntean, Sara Lonardi, Marina Nechaeva, Arinilda C Bragagnoli, Hasan S Coşkun, Antonio Cubillo Gracian, Toshimi Takano, Rachel Wong, Howard Safran, Gina M Vaccaro, Zev A Wainberg, Matthew R Silver, Huiling Xiong, Janet Hong, Julien Taieb, Yung-Jue Bang

Abstract

Purpose: The role of maintenance therapy for gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) is unclear. We investigated avelumab (anti-programmed death ligand-1 [PD-L1]) maintenance after first-line induction chemotherapy for GC/GEJC.

Patients and methods: JAVELIN Gastric 100 was a global, open-label, phase III trial. Eligible patients had untreated, unresectable, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic GC or GEJC. Patients without progressive disease after 12 weeks of first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine were randomly assigned 1:1 to avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or continued chemotherapy, stratified by region (Asia v non-Asia). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) after induction chemotherapy in all randomly assigned patients or the PD-L1-positive randomly assigned population (≥ 1% of tumor cells; 73-10 assay).

Results: A total of 805 patients received induction; 499 were randomly assigned to avelumab (n = 249) or continued chemotherapy (n = 250). Median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.1 to 12.0 months) versus 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 12.4 months) and 24-month OS rate was 22.1% versus 15.5% with avelumab versus chemotherapy, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.11; P = .1779). In the PD-L1-positive population (n = 54), the HR for OS was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.57 to 2.23; P = .6352). In an exploratory analysis of the PD-L1-positive population, defined as combined positive score ≥ 1 (22C3 assay; n = 137), median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 17.3 months) with avelumab versus 11.6 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 12.6 months) with chemotherapy (unstratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.05). With avelumab and chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 149 (61.3%) and 184 (77.3%) patients, including grade ≥ 3 TRAEs in 31 (12.8%) and 78 (32.8%) patients, respectively.

Conclusion: JAVELIN Gastric 100 did not demonstrate superior OS with avelumab maintenance versus continued chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC or GEJC overall or in a prespecified PD-L1-positive population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02625610.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. AE, adverse event; BSC, best supportive care; FU, fluorouracil; PD, progressive disease.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Overall survival (OS; measured from random assignment after 12 weeks of induction chemotherapy) in (A) all randomly assigned patients, (B) prespecified programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive population (tumor cell PD-L1 expression, ≥ 1% cutoff; 73-10 assay), and (C) exploratory subset of patients with PD-L1–positive tumors based on combined positive score (≥ 1 cutoff; 22C3 assay). HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Overall survival (OS; measured from random assignment after 12 weeks of induction chemotherapy [ie, re-baseline]) in subgroups. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for a univariable unstratified model. In the microsatellite instability (MSI)–high subgroup, 12-month OS rate was 75.0% (95% CI, 31.5 to 93.1) in the avelumab arm and 40.0% (95% CI, 5.2 to 75.3) in the chemotherapy arm. CR, complete response; FU, fluorouracil; GEJ, gastroesophageal junction; NR, not reached; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Time to and duration of response (investigator assessed per RECIST [version 1.1]) during the maintenance phase (after random assignment) in (A) avelumab and (B) chemotherapy arms. Responses were based on subsequent change after random assignment (during maintenance) in patients who had achieved partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) after induction chemotherapy. Excludes 10 patients with complete response (CR) during induction chemotherapy. NR, not reached; PD, progressive disease.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that occurred at any grade in ≥ 10% or grade ≥ 3 in ≥ 1% of patients in either arm during the maintenance phase (after random assignment). GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; PPE, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Overall survival (OS; measured from random assignment after 12 weeks of induction chemotherapy) in (A) Asian patients and (B) subset with programmed death ligand-1–high tumors based on the 22C3 assay (combined positive score ≥ 10; 22C3 assay). HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached.
FIG A2.
FIG A2.
Progression-free survival (PFS; measured from random assignment to first documentation of progressive disease per RECIST [version 1.1] according to investigator assessment or death resulting from any cause, whichever occurred first) in (A) all randomly assigned patients, (B) prespecified programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive population (≥ 1% of tumor cells; 73-10 assay), and (C) exploratory subset with PD-L1–positive tumors (combined positive score ≥ 1; 22C3 assay). HR, hazard ratio.

References

    1. Leiting JL, Grotz TE: Advancements and challenges in treating advanced gastric cancer in the West. World J Gastrointest Oncol 11:652-664, 2019
    1. Smyth EC Verheij M Allum W, et al. : Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38-v49, 2016. (suppl 5)
    1. Muro K Lordick F Tsushima T, et al. : Pan-Asian adapted ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer: A JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol 30:34-43, 2019
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Gastric cancer (version 4.2019). .
    1. Koizumi W Narahara H Hara T, et al. : S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): A phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215-221, 2008
    1. Lordick F Kang YK Chung HC, et al. : Capecitabine and cisplatin with or without cetuximab for patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (EXPAND): A randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:490-499, 2013
    1. Digklia A, Wagner AD: Advanced gastric cancer: Current treatment landscape and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 22:2403-2414, 2016
    1. Wagner AD Syn NL Moehler M, et al. : Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD004064, 2017
    1. Alsina M Moehler M Hierro C, et al. : Immunotherapy for gastric cancer: A focus on immune checkpoints. Target Oncol 11:469-477, 2016
    1. Ciuleanu T Brodowicz T Zielinski C, et al. : Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet 374:1432-1440, 2009
    1. Coleman RL Oza AM Lorusso D, et al. : Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390:1949-1961, 2017
    1. Mirza MR Monk BJ Herrstedt J, et al. : Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 375:2154-2164, 2016
    1. Poveda A, Floquet A, Ledermann JA, et al: Final overall survival (OS) results from SOLO2/ENGOT-ov21: A phase III trial assessing maintenance olaparib in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation. J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl; abstr 6002)
    1. Bang YJ Cho JY Kim YH, et al. : Efficacy of sequential ipilimumab monotherapy versus best supportive care for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:5671-5678, 2017
    1. Meulendijks D de Groot JW Los M, et al. : Bevacizumab combined with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine, followed by maintenance with capecitabine and bevacizumab, as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer: A multicenter phase 2 study. Cancer 122:1434-1443, 2016
    1. Eren OO Ozturk MA Sonmez OU, et al. : Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of capecitabine maintenance in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study. Am J Ther 23:e1493-e1497, 2016
    1. Kang YK Boku N Satoh T, et al. : Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390:2461-2471, 2017
    1. Bang YJ Kang YK Catenacci DV, et al. : Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Results from the phase II nonrandomized KEYNOTE-059 study. Gastric Cancer 22:828-837, 2019
    1. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al: Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: Phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial. JAMA Oncol 4:e180013, 2018 [Erratum: JAMA Oncol 5:579, 2019]
    1. Muro K Chung HC Shankaran V, et al. : Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): A multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 17:717-726, 2016
    1. Shitara K Özgüroğlu M Bang YJ, et al. : Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): A randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 392:123-133, 2018
    1. Gulley JL Rajan A Spigel DR, et al. : Avelumab for patients with previously treated metastatic or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): Dose-expansion cohort of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 18:599-610, 2017
    1. Disis ML Taylor MH Kelly K, et al. : Efficacy and safety of avelumab for patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. JAMA Oncol 5:393-401, 2019
    1. Patel MR Ellerton J Infante JR, et al. : Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): Pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:51-64, 2018
    1. Le Tourneau C Hoimes C Zarwan C, et al. : Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. J Immunother Cancer 6:111, 2018
    1. Keilholz U Mehnert JM Bauer S, et al. : Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. J Immunother Cancer 7:12, 2019
    1. Hassan R Thomas A Nemunaitis JJ, et al. : Efficacy and safety of avelumab treatment in patients with advanced unresectable mesothelioma: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. JAMA Oncol 5:351-357, 2019
    1. Chung HC Arkenau HT Lee J, et al. : Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) as first-line switch-maintenance or second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. J Immunother Cancer 7:30, 2019
    1. Kulangara K Zhang N Corigliano E, et al. : Clinical utility of the combined positive score for programmed death ligand-1 expression and the approval of pembrolizumab for treatment of gastric cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 143:330-337, 2019
    1. Hassan R, Thomas A, Nemunaitis JJ, et al: Avelumab in patients with previously treated mesothelioma: Updated phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 166)
    1. Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: The KEYNOTE-062 Phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 6:1-10, 2020.
    1. Bang YJ Ruiz EY Van Cutsem E, et al. : Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician’s choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: Primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300. Ann Oncol 29:2052-2060, 2018

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren