Cost-Utility Analysis of a Dolutegravir-Based Versus Low-Dose Efavirenz-Based Regimen for the Initial Treatment of HIV-Infected Patients in Cameroon (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Trial)

Marwân-Al-Qays Bousmah, Marie Libérée Nishimwe, Tamara Tovar-Sanchez, Martial Lantche Wandji, Mireille Mpoudi-Etame, Gwenaëlle Maradan, Pierrette Omgba Bassega, Marie Varloteaux, Alice Montoyo, Charles Kouanfack, Eric Delaporte, Sylvie Boyer, New Antiretroviral and Monitoring Strategies in HIV-infected Adults in Low-Income Countries (NAMSAL) ANRS 12313 Study Group, A Ayouba, A Agholeng, C Butel, A Cournil, E Delaporte, S Eymard-Duvernay, B Granouillac, S Izard, A Lacroix, S Leroy, M Peeters, S Perrineau, L Serrano, J Reynes, T Tovar-Sanchez, N Vidal, P J Fouda, C Kounfack, R Mougnoutou, J Olinga, V Omgba, S C Tchokonte Ngandé, B Ymele, A Kambi, C D Epoupa Mpacko, M Mpoudi-Etame, M Fotso, R Moukoko, T Nké, A Akamba, S Lekelem, P Omgba Bassega, S B Tongo Fotack, S Ngono, M Tanga, E Ebong, G Edoul Mbesse, M Tsongo, E Mpoudi-Ngolé, T Abong, L Ciaffi, S Koulla-Shiro, M Lantché Wandji, G Manirakiza, E D Mimbé, D Tetsa Tata, M Varloteaux, S Boyer, M-Q Bousmah, G Maradan, M L Nishimwe, B Spire, M P Lê, G Peytavin, A Diallo, I Fournier, A Montoyo, N Mercier, C Rekacewicz, C Perez Casa, C Charpentier, N Clumeck, P Flandre, F Ngom Gueye, L Weiss, A Calmy, C Kouanfack, A Hill, J Reynes, E Delaporte, Marwân-Al-Qays Bousmah, Marie Libérée Nishimwe, Tamara Tovar-Sanchez, Martial Lantche Wandji, Mireille Mpoudi-Etame, Gwenaëlle Maradan, Pierrette Omgba Bassega, Marie Varloteaux, Alice Montoyo, Charles Kouanfack, Eric Delaporte, Sylvie Boyer, New Antiretroviral and Monitoring Strategies in HIV-infected Adults in Low-Income Countries (NAMSAL) ANRS 12313 Study Group, A Ayouba, A Agholeng, C Butel, A Cournil, E Delaporte, S Eymard-Duvernay, B Granouillac, S Izard, A Lacroix, S Leroy, M Peeters, S Perrineau, L Serrano, J Reynes, T Tovar-Sanchez, N Vidal, P J Fouda, C Kounfack, R Mougnoutou, J Olinga, V Omgba, S C Tchokonte Ngandé, B Ymele, A Kambi, C D Epoupa Mpacko, M Mpoudi-Etame, M Fotso, R Moukoko, T Nké, A Akamba, S Lekelem, P Omgba Bassega, S B Tongo Fotack, S Ngono, M Tanga, E Ebong, G Edoul Mbesse, M Tsongo, E Mpoudi-Ngolé, T Abong, L Ciaffi, S Koulla-Shiro, M Lantché Wandji, G Manirakiza, E D Mimbé, D Tetsa Tata, M Varloteaux, S Boyer, M-Q Bousmah, G Maradan, M L Nishimwe, B Spire, M P Lê, G Peytavin, A Diallo, I Fournier, A Montoyo, N Mercier, C Rekacewicz, C Perez Casa, C Charpentier, N Clumeck, P Flandre, F Ngom Gueye, L Weiss, A Calmy, C Kouanfack, A Hill, J Reynes, E Delaporte

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence comparing the economic and patient values of the World Health Organization's preferred (dolutegravir 50 mg [DTG]-based) and alternative (low-dose [400 mg] efavirenz [EFV400]-based) first-line antiretroviral regimens is limited. We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs), costs, and the cost-utility of DTG- versus EFV400-based regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1 adults in the randomised NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial in Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Methods: We used clinical data, PROs, and health resource use data collected in the trial's first 96 weeks (2016-2019). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were computed using utility scores obtained from the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) generic health scale. Other PROs included perceived symptoms, depression, anxiety, and stress. In the 96-week base-case analysis, we estimated the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted (1) mean costs (in US$, 2016 values) and QALYs/patient, (2) incremental costs and QALYs/patient, and (3) net health benefit (NHB). Outcomes were extrapolated over 5 and 10 years. Uncertainty was assessed using the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and scenario and cost-effective price threshold analyses.

Results: In the base-case analysis, the NHB (95% confidence interval) for the DTG-based regimen relative to the EFV400-based regimen was 0.056 (- 0.037 to 0.153), corresponding to an 88% probability of DTG being cost-effective. A 10% decrease in this regimen's price (from $5.2 to $4.7/month) would increase its cost-effectiveness probability to 95%. When extrapolating outcomes over 5 and 10 years, the DTG-based regimen had a 100% probability of being cost-effective for a large range of cost-effectiveness thresholds.

Conclusions: At 2020 antiretroviral drug prices, a DTG-based first-line regimen should be preferred over an EFV400-based regimen in sub-Saharan Africa.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02777229.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflict of interest in relation to this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
State transition diagram for the Markov cohort simulation model. The oval boxes represent the different HSs in the model. Arrows denote the transitions between HSs according to immunological progression and treatment success. ART antiretroviral treatment, HS health state
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Baseline and evolution of the mean Physical and Mental Component Summary (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial, n = 575). Baseline and evolution between baseline and W96 of the mean PCS (a) and MCS (b) in the DTG and EFV400 arms. Both scores range from 0 to 100, with higher values corresponding to better health-related quality of life. No significant differences were found between arms at any time point for both the PCS and MCS. The PCS increased by 11.9% (p < 0.0001) and 9.0% (p < 0.0001) in the DTG and EFV400 arm, respectively. The MCS increased by 8.0% (p = 0.0001) and 7.5% (p < 0.0001) in the DTG and EFV400 arms, respectively. DTG dolutegravir, EFV400 efavirenz 400 mg, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, MCS mental component summary, NAMSAL New Antiretroviral and Monitoring Strategies in HIV-infected Adults in Low-Income Countries, PCS physical component summary, W week
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Baseline and evolution of the proportions of patients with at least mild depression, anxiety, and stress (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial, n = 575). Baseline and evolution between baseline and W96 of the proportions of patients with at least mild depression (a), mild anxiety (b), and mild stress (c), assessed using the DASS-21 scale, in the DTG and EFV400 arms. No significant differences were found between arms at any time point for all three outcomes. The decrease of the proportion between baseline and W96 of patients with at least mild depression and mild anxiety was significant in both arms. However, the decrease in the proportion of patients with at least mild stress between baseline and W96 was not significant in the DTG arm (p = 0.24) and in the EFV400 arm (p = 0.054). DASS-21 Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale—21 items, DTG dolutegravir, EFV400 efavirenz 400 mg, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, NAMSAL New Antiretroviral and Monitoring Strategies in HIV-infected Adults in Low-Income Countries, W week
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve of DTG- vs low-dose EFV-based regimen (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial). a Cost-effectiveness plane depicting the 5000 simulated pairs of incremental costs and QALYs of DTG vs EFV400, with the hollow diamond representing the base-case estimate (ΔCosts = − US$27.8; ΔQALYs = 0.000). b Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showing the probability of DTG being cost-effective compared with EFV400 at various thresholds ranging from 0 to US$10,000/QALY. In both figures, the short-dashed line, the long-dashed line, and the dashed-dotted line indicate the cost-effectiveness thresholds of US$500/QALY and one (US$1392/QALY) and three (US$4175/QALY) times the 2016 Cameroonian GDP per capita, respectively. DTG dolutegravir, EFV efavirenz, EFV400 efavirenz 400 mg, GDP gross domestic product, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, NAMSAL New Antiretroviral and Monitoring Strategies in HIV-infected Adults in Low-Income Countries, Q quadrant, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, Δ difference
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cost-effectiveness price thresholds for DTG- and low-dose EFV-based regimens (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial). CE price thresholds for DTG- and EFV400-based regimens indicating which regimen would be preferred at the threshold of US$500 per QALY gained, and for any price combination of DTG and EFV400 FDC. The price combinations on the hollow circle line would make DTG CE with a probability of 95%. Any price combination on the solid triangle line would make EFV400 CE with a probability of 95%. The solid circle line depicts the price combinations for which both strategies have the same probability of being CE: Prob(DTG:CE) = Prob(EFV400:CE) = 50%. CE cost-effective, DTG dolutegravir, EFV efavirenz, EFV400 efavirenz 400 mg, FDC fixed-dose combinations, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, NAMSAL New Antiretroviral and Monitoring Strategies in HIV-infected Adults in Low-Income Countries, Prob probability, QALY quality-adjusted life-year

References

    1. World Health Organization. Updated recommendations on first-line and second-line antiretroviral regimens and post-exposure prophylaxis and recommendations on early infant diagnosis of HIV [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Report No.: WHO/CDS/HIV/18.51. Available from: .
    1. Shubber Z, Calmy A, Andrieux-Meyer I, Vitoria M, Renaud-Théry F, Shaffer N, et al. Adverse events associated with nevirapine and efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2013;27:1403–1412. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835f1db0.
    1. Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, Duiculescu D, Eberhard A, Gutiérrez F, et al. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1807–1818. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215541.
    1. World Health Organization. Statement on DTG—Geneva 18 May 2018 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: .
    1. Hill AM, Mitchell N, Hughes S, Pozniak AL. Risks of cardiovascular or central nervous system adverse events and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, for dolutegravir versus other antiretrovirals: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018;13:102–111. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000445.
    1. Hill A, Waters L, Pozniak A. Are new antiretroviral treatments increasing the risks of clinical obesity? J Virus Erad. 2019;5:41–43. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30277-6.
    1. ENCORE1 Study Group Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1474–1482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62187-X.
    1. World Health Organization. Update of recommendations on first-and second-line antiretroviral regimens [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Report No.: WHO/CDS/HIV/19.15. Available from: .
    1. NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Study Group. Dolutegravir-based or low-dose efavirenz-based regimen for the treatment of HIV-1. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:816–26.
    1. Calmy A, Sanchez TT, Kouanfack C, Mpoudi-Etame M, Leroy S, Perrineau S, et al. Dolutegravir-based and low-dose efavirenz-based regimen for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (NAMSAL): week 96 results from a two-group, multicentre, randomised, open label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial in Cameroon. Lancet HIV. 2020;7:e677–e687. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30238-1.
    1. Inzaule SC, Ondoa P, Peter T, Mugyenyi PN, Stevens WS, de Wit TFR, et al. Affordable HIV drug-resistance testing for monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:e267–e275. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30118-9.
    1. Kall M, Marcellin F, Harding R, Lazarus JV, Carrieri P. Patient-reported outcomes to enhance person-centred HIV care. Lancet HIV. 2020;7:e59–68. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30345-5.
    1. Phillips AN, Cambiano V, Nakagawa F, Revill P, Jordan MR, Hallett TB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of public-health policy options in the presence of pretreatment NNRTI drug resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5:e146–e154. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30190-X.
    1. Phillips AN, Venter F, Havlir D, Pozniak A, Kuritzkes D, Wensing A, et al. Risks and benefits of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral drug regimens in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study. Lancet HIV. 2019;6:e116–e127. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30317-5.
    1. Phillips AN, Bansi-Matharu L, Venter F, Havlir D, Pozniak A, Kuritzkes DR, et al. Updated assessment of risks and benefits of dolutegravir versus efavirenz in new antiretroviral treatment initiators in sub-Saharan Africa: modelling to inform treatment guidelines. Lancet HIV. 2020;7:e193–200. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30400-X.
    1. Justice AC, Holmes W, Gifford AL, Rabeneck L, Zackin R, Sinclair G, et al. Development and validation of a self-completed HIV symptom index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(Suppl 1):S77–90. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00449-8.
    1. Clifford DB, Evans S, Yang Y, Acosta EP, Goodkin K, Tashima K, et al. Impact of efavirenz on neuropsychological performance and symptoms in HIV-infected individuals. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:714–721. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-00008.
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44:227–239. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657.
    1. Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Ware JE. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2008.
    1. Hunter RM, Baio G, Butt T, Morris S, Round J, Freemantle N. An educational review of the statistical issues in analysing utility data for cost-utility analysis. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33:355–366. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0247-6.
    1. Protopopescu C, Boyer S, Marcellin F, Carrieri M-P, Koulla-Shiro S, Spire B. Validation de l’échelle de qualité de vie SF-12 chez des patients infectés par le VIH au Cameroun (enquête EVAL–ANRS 12–116) Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011;59:S9. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.02.074.
    1. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42:851–859. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135827.18610.0d.
    1. Dhaliwal I, Duflo E, Glennerster R, Tulloch C. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis to inform policy in developing countries: a general framework with applications for education. Education Policy in Developing Countries. Paul Glewwe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013. p. 285–338.
    1. Global Fund. Pooled Procurement Mechanism Reference Pricing: ARVs (version: quarter 3 2020) [Internet]. 2020. .
    1. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Exchange rates (indicator) [Internet]. 2020. 10.1787/037ed317-en.
    1. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. GDP implicit price deflator in United States [Internet]. 2020. Available from: .
    1. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic evaluation in clinical trials. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
    1. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)–explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16:231–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
    1. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006 [cited 2020 May 21]. Available from: .
    1. Woods B, Revill P, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Country-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further research. Value Health. 2016;19:929–935. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.017.
    1. Löthgren M, Zethraeus N. Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 2000;9:623–630. doi: 10.1002/1099-1050(200010)9:7<623::AID-HEC539>;2-V.
    1. Simpson KN, Baran RW, Kirbach SE, Dietz B. Economics of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in Africa: estimates based on DART trial results and costs for Uganda and Kenya. Value Health. 2011;14:1048–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.011.
    1. Boyer S, Nishimwe ML, Sagaon-Teyssier L, March L, Koulla-Shiro S, Bousmah M-Q, et al. Cost-effectiveness of three alternative boosted protease inhibitor-based second-line regimens in HIV-infected patients in West and Central Africa. Pharmacoecon Open. 2020;4:45–60. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0157-9.
    1. Ciaffi L, Koulla-Shiro S, Sawadogo A, le Moing V, Eymard-Duvernay S, Izard S, et al. Efficacy and safety of three second-line antiretroviral regimens in HIV-infected patients in Africa. AIDS. 2015;29:1473–1481. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000709.
    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. van Osch SMC, Wakker PP, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM. Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities. Med Decis Mak. 2004;24:511–517. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04268955.
    1. Medina-Lara A, Wakholi BN, Kasirye A, Munderi P, Watera C, Lalloo DG, et al. Utility assessment of HIV/AIDS-related health states in HIV-infected Ugandans. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 1):S123–130. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000327633.85221.9a.
    1. Long-Term Virological Suppression Working Group for the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) in EuroCoord. Long-term virological suppression on first-line efavirenz + tenofovir + emtricitabine/lamivudine for HIV-1. AIDS. 2019;33:745–51.
    1. Altice F, Evuarherhe O, Shina S, Carter G, Beaubrun AC. Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:475–490. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S192735.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren