Adjunctive IgM-enriched immunoglobulin therapy with a personalised dose based on serum IgM-titres versus standard dose in the treatment of septic shock: a randomised controlled trial (IgM-fat trial)

Emanuela Biagioni, Martina Tosi, Giorgio Berlot, Giacomo Castiglione, Alberto Corona, Maria Giovanna De Cristofaro, Abele Donati, Paolo Feltracco, Francesco Forfori, Fiorentino Fragranza, Patrizia Murino, Ornella Piazza, Livio Tullo, Giacomo Grasselli, Roberto D'Amico, Massimo Girardis, Emanuela Biagioni, Martina Tosi, Giorgio Berlot, Giacomo Castiglione, Alberto Corona, Maria Giovanna De Cristofaro, Abele Donati, Paolo Feltracco, Francesco Forfori, Fiorentino Fragranza, Patrizia Murino, Ornella Piazza, Livio Tullo, Giacomo Grasselli, Roberto D'Amico, Massimo Girardis

Abstract

Introduction: In patients with septic shock, low levels of circulating immunoglobulins are common and their kinetics appear to be related to clinical outcome. The pivotal role of immunoglobulins in the host immune response to infection suggests that additional therapy with polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulins may be a promising option in patients with septic shock. Immunoglobulin preparations enriched with the IgM component have largely been used in sepsis, mostly at standard dosages (250 mg/kg per day), regardless of clinical severity and without any dose adjustment based on immunoglobulin serum titres or other biomarkers. We hypothesised that a personalised dose of IgM enriched preparation based on patient IgM titres and aimed to achieve a specific threshold of IgM titre is more effective in decreasing mortality than a standard dose.

Methods and analysis: The study is designed as a multicentre, interventional, randomised, single-blinded, prospective, investigator sponsored, two-armed study. Patients with septic shock and IgM titres <60 mg/dL will be randomly assigned to an IgM titre-based treatment or a standard treatment group in a ratio of 1:1. The study will involve 12 Italian intensive care units and 356 patients will be enrolled. Patients assigned to the IgM titre-based treatment will receive a personalised daily dose based on an IgM serum titre aimed at achieving serum titres above 100 mg/dL up to discontinuation of vasoactive drugs or day 7 after enrolment. Patients assigned to the IgM standard treatment group will receive IgM enriched preparation daily for three consecutive days at the standard dose of 250 mg/kg. The primary endpoint will be all-cause mortality at 28 days.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of the coordinating centre (Comitato Etico dell'Area Vasta Emilia Nord) and collaborating centres. The results of the trial will be published within 12 months from the end of the study and the steering committee has the right to present them at public symposia and conferences.

Trial registration details: The trial protocol and information documents have received a favourable opinion from the Area Vasta Emilia Nord Ethical Committee on 12 September 2019. The trial protocol has been registered on EudraCT (2018-001613-33) on 18 April 2018 and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04182737) on 2 December 2019.

Keywords: immunology; infectious diseases; intensive & critical care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: GB and MG have received honoraria and lecture fees from Biotest Germany and Biotest Italy. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests in this section.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2013;369:840–51. 10.1056/NEJMra1208623
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41:580–637.
    1. Busani S, Damiani E, Cavazzuti I. Intravenous immunoglobulin in septic shock: review of the mechanisms of action and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness. Minerva Anestesiol 2016;82:559–72.
    1. Laudari L, Sakr Y, Elia C, et al. . Epidemiology and outcome of sepsis syndromes in Italian ICUs: a regional multicenter observational cohort. Crit Care 2012;16:P397 10.1186/cc11004
    1. Cavazzuti I, Serafini G, Busani S, et al. . Early therapy with IgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulin in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2014;40:1888–96. 10.1007/s00134-014-3474-6
    1. Hall MJ, Williams SN, DeFrances CJ. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief 2011;62:1–8.
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:17–60. 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2016, 2017. Available: [Accessed Mar 2018].
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. . The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1546–54. 10.1056/NEJMoa022139
    1. Bermejo-Martín JF, Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Herrán-Monge R, et al. . Immunoglobulins IgG1, IgM and IgA: a synergistic team influencing survival in sepsis. J Intern Med 2014;276:404–12. 10.1111/joim.12265
    1. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Apostolidou E, Lada M, et al. . Kinetics of circulating immunoglobulin M in sepsis: relationship with final outcome. Crit Care 2013;17:R247. 10.1186/cc13073
    1. Venet F, Gebeile R, Bancel J, et al. . Assessment of plasmatic immunoglobulin G, A and M levels in septic shock patients. Int Immunopharmacol 2011;11:2086–90. 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.08.024
    1. Ehrenstein MR, Notley CA. The importance of natural IgM: scavenger, protector and regulator. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:778–86. 10.1038/nri2849
    1. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Tziolos N, Routsi C, et al. . Improving outcomes of severe infections by multidrug-resistant pathogens with polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulins. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016;22:499–506. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.021
    1. Shankar-Hari M, Spencer J, Sewell WA, et al. . Bench-to-bedside review: Immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis - biological plausibility from a critical care perspective. Crit Care 2012;16:206. 10.1186/cc10597
    1. Soares MO, Welton NJ, Harrison DA, et al. . An evaluation of the feasibility, cost and value of information of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for sepsis (severe sepsis and septic shock): incorporating a systematic review, meta-analysis and value of information analysis. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1–186. 10.3310/hta16070
    1. Kreymann KG, de Heer G, Nierhaus A, et al. . Use of polyclonal immunoglobulins as adjunctive therapy for sepsis or septic shock. Crit Care Med 2007;35:2677–85.
    1. Just HM, Metzger M, Vogel W, et al. . [Effect of adjuvant immunoglobulin therapy on infections in patients in an surgical intensive care unit. Results of a randomized controlled study]. Klin Wochenschr 1986;64:245–56. 10.1007/BF01711930
    1. Rodríguez A, Rello J, Neira J. Effects of high-dose of intravenous immunoglobulin and antibiotics on survival for severe sepsis undergoing surgery. Shock 2005;23:298–304. 10.1097/01.shk.0000157302.69125.f8
    1. Famous KR, Delucchi K, Ware LB, et al. . Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes respond differently to randomized fluid management strategy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:331–8. 10.1164/rccm.201603-0645OC
    1. Osuchowski MF, Connett J, Welch K, et al. . Stratification is the key: inflammatory biomarkers accurately direct immunomodulatory therapy in experimental sepsis*. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1567–73. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819df06b
    1. Karatzas S, Boutzouka E, Venetsanou K, et al. . The effects of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparations in patients with severe sepsis: another point of view. Crit Care 2002;6:543–5. 10.1186/cc1837
    1. Tugrul S, Ozcan PE, Akinci O, et al. . The effects of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparations in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care 2002;6:357–62. 10.1186/cc1523
    1. Vincent J-L, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. . The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707–10. 10.1007/BF01709751
    1. Lefering R, Goris RJA, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, et al. . Revision of the multiple organ failure score. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002;387:14–20. 10.1007/s00423-001-0269-3
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:260–8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70001-X
    1. Welte T, Dellinger RP, Ebelt H, et al. . Efficacy and safety of trimodulin, a novel polyclonal antibody preparation, in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase II trial (CIGMA study). Intensive Care Med 2018;44:438–48. 10.1007/s00134-018-5143-7

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren