Non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty

Simon Bugeja, Daniela E Andrich, Anthony R Mundy, Simon Bugeja, Daniela E Andrich, Anthony R Mundy

Abstract

Excision and end-to-end anastomosis (EPA) has been the preferred urethroplasty technique for short bulbar strictures and is associated with an excellent functional outcome. Driven by concerns over the potential morbidity associated with dividing the urethra, therefore compromising spongiosal blood flow, as well as spongiofibrosis being superficial in the majority of non-traumatic bulbar strictures, the non-transecting technique for bulbar urethroplasty has been developed with the aim of achieving the same success as EPA without the morbidity associated with transection. This manuscript highlights the fundamental principles underlying the ongoing debate-transection or non-transection of the strictured bulbar urethra? The potential advantages of avoiding dividing the corpus spongiosum of the urethra are discussed. The non-transecting anastomotic procedure together with its various modifications are decribed in detail. Our experience with this technique is presented. Non-transecting excision of spongiofibrosis with preservation of well vascularised underlying spongiosum provides an excellent alternative to dividing the urethra during urethroplasty for short non-traumatic proximal bulbar strictures.

Keywords: Anterior urethral strictures; urethral reconstruction; urethroplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A typical idiopathic bulbar stricture; short, sharp and at the junction of the proximal and middle thirds; likely congenital in origin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A midline perineal incision is made (A) and deepened down to the bulbar urethra which is mobilised dorsally off the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa (B). A dorsal stricturotomy is made by cutting down onto a catheter in the urethra at the stricture site (C) and stay sutures positioned (D). A gorget facilitates extension of the stricturotomy into healthy urethra on either side of the stricture (E).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dorsal stricturotomy of a short membrane-like stricture: operative photograph (A); diagrammatic representation (B); the stricture is not excised but the epithelial defects on either side of the preserved strip are sutured (C). The dorsal stricturotomy closed transversely as in Figure 4 [reproduced with permission from (27)].
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Diagram showing appearance following excision of epithelial and spongiofibrotic components of the stricture. Underlying spongiosum is visible; (B) the healthy mucosal edges adjacent to the excised spongiofibrosis are anastomosed in a tension-free fashion; (C) the longitudinal dorsal stricturotomy is closed in a horizontal plane [reproduced with permission from (27)].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Radiological appearance before and after (A,B) NTABU and (C,D) ANTABU. Even though the urethral calibre is maintained after NTABU, there is a characteristic buckled appearance of the ventral aspect of the urethra resulting from shortening of the dorsal aspect produced by the stricturoplasty.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Radiological appearance (A) before and (B) after stricturoplasty for short, sharp, proximal bulbar strictures.

References

    1. Barbagli G, Sansalone S, Romano G, et al. Bulbar urethroplasty: transecting vs. nontransecting techniques. Curr Opin Urol 2012;22:474-7.
    1. Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral strictures. BJU Int 2011;107:6-26.
    1. Steenkamp JW, Heyns CF, de Kock ML. Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 1997;157:98-101.
    1. Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Andrich DE, et al. Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. J Urol 2004;172:275-7.
    1. Naudé AM, Heyns CF. What is the place of internal urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture disease? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005;2:538-45.
    1. Netto NR, Jr, Martucci RC, Goncalves ES, et al. Congenital stricture of male urethra. Int Urol Nephrol 1976;8:55-61.
    1. Sugimoto M, Kakehi Y, Yamashita M, et al. Ten cases of congenital urethral stricture in childhood with enuresis. Int J Urol 2005;12:558-62.
    1. Mundy AR. Anastomotic urethroplasty. BJU Int 2005;96:921-44.
    1. Morey AF, Watkin N, Shenfeld O, et al. SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: Anterior urethra--primary anastomosis. Urology 2014;83:S23-6.
    1. Guralnick ML, Webster GD. The augmented anastomotic urethroplasty: indications and outcome in 29 patients. J Urol 2001;165:1496-501.
    1. Abouassaly R, Angermeier KW. Augmented anastomotic urethroplasty. J Urol 2007;177:2211-5; discussion 2215-6.
    1. Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. Eur Urol 2008;53:828-33.
    1. Terlecki RP, Steele MC, Valadez C, et al. Grafts are unnecessary for proximal bulbar reconstruction. J Urol 2010;184:2395-9.
    1. Barbagli G, Lazzeri M. Reconstructive urethral surgery to be addressed at 2009 GURS meeting. AUANews 2009;14:14.
    1. Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty. In: Brandes SB, Morey AF. eds. Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery, New York: Humana Press, 2014:531-40.
    1. Cavalcanti AG, Costa WS, Baskin LS, et al. A morphometric analysis of bulbar urethral strictures. BJU Int 2007;100:397-402.
    1. Jordan GH, Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R. The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction. J Urol 2007;177:1799-802.
    1. Al-Qudah HS, Santucci RA. Buccal mucosal onlay urethroplasty versus anastomotic urethroplasty (AU) for short urethral strictures: which is better? J Urol 2006;175:103.
    1. Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Romano G, et al. Long-term followup of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: a retrospective analysis of 153 patients in a single center experience. J Urol 2007;178:2470-3.
    1. Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Meeks JJ, et al. Prospective analysis of erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: incidence and recovery of function. J Urol 2010;183:657-61.
    1. Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R, Schlossberg SM, et al. Long-term followup for excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 2007;177:1803-6.
    1. Santucci RA, Mario LA, McAninch JW. Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients. J Urol 2002;167:1715-9.
    1. Mangera A, Patterson JM, Chapple CR. A systematic review of graft augmentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol 2011;59:797-814.
    1. Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, et al. The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol 2003;170:90-2.
    1. Palminteri E, Franco G, Berdondini E, et al. Anterior urethroplasty and effects on sexual life: which is the best technique? Minerva Urol Nefrol 2010;62:371-6.
    1. Gur U, Jordan GH. Vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (for proximal bulbar urethral strictures). BJU Int 2008;101:1183-95.
    1. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary report. BJU Int 2012;109:1090-4.
    1. Welk BK, Kodama RT. The augmented nontransected anastomotic urethroplasty for the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. Urology 2012;79:917-21.
    1. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Complications of 'Social' Lithotomy. BJU Int 2010;16 40-1.
    1. Pocivavsek L, Efrati E, Lee KY, et al. Three-dimensional geometry of the Heineke-Mikulicz strictureplasty. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:704-11.
    1. Andrich DE, Leach CJ, Mundy AR. The Barbagli procedure gives the best results for patch urethroplasty of the bulbar urethra. BJU Int 2001;88:385-9.
    1. Gingu C, Dick A, Patrascoiu S, et al. Nontransecting augmented roof anastomosis: The technique of choice for long bulbar urethral strictures with limited spongiofibrosis. Eur Urol Suppl 2014;13:e77.
    1. Jackson MJ, Sciberras J, Mangera A, et al. Defining a patient-reported outcome measure for urethral stricture surgery. Eur Urol 2011;60:60-8.
    1. Jackson MJ, Chaudhury I, Mangera A, et al. A prospective patient-centred evaluation of urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture using a validated patient-reported outcome measure. Eur Urol 2013;64:777-82.
    1. Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Granieri MA, et al. Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol 2009;182:1266-70.
    1. Barbagli G, Vallasciani S, Romano G, et al. Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek. Eur Urol 2010;58:33-41.
    1. Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, et al. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol 2004;172:580-3.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren