Association of Serum MiR-142-3p and MiR-101-3p Levels with Acute Cellular Rejection after Heart Transplantation

Ihdina Sukma Dewi, Zsuzsanna Hollander, Karen K Lam, Janet-Wilson McManus, Scott J Tebbutt, Raymond T Ng, Paul A Keown, Robert W McMaster, Bruce M McManus, Olof Gidlöf, Jenny Öhman, Ihdina Sukma Dewi, Zsuzsanna Hollander, Karen K Lam, Janet-Wilson McManus, Scott J Tebbutt, Raymond T Ng, Paul A Keown, Robert W McMaster, Bruce M McManus, Olof Gidlöf, Jenny Öhman

Abstract

Background: Identifying non-invasive and reliable blood-derived biomarkers for early detection of acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients is of great importance in clinical practice. MicroRNAs are small molecules found to be stable in serum and their expression patterns reflect both physiological and underlying pathological conditions in human.

Methods: We compared a group of heart transplant recipients with histologically-verified acute cellular rejection (ACR, n = 26) with a control group of heart transplant recipients without allograft rejection (NR, n = 37) by assessing the levels of a select set of microRNAs in serum specimens.

Results: The levels of seven microRNAs, miR-142-3p, miR-101-3p, miR-424-5p, miR-27a-3p, miR-144-3p, miR-339-3p and miR-326 were significantly higher in ACR group compared to the control group and could discriminate between patients with and without allograft rejection. MiR-142-3p and miR-101-3p had the best diagnostic test performance among the microRNAs tested. Serum levels of miR-142-3p and miR-101-3p were independent of calcineurin inhibitor levels, as measured by tacrolimus and cyclosporin; kidney function, as measured by creatinine level, and general inflammation state, as measured by CRP level.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated two microRNAs, miR-142-3p and miR-101-3p, that could be relevant as non-invasive diagnostic tools for identifying heart transplant patients with acute cellular rejection.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Serum levels of microRNAs in…
Fig 1. Serum levels of microRNAs in heart transplant patients.
The levels of seven microRNAs were significantly higher in heart transplant patients with allograft rejection (ACR, n = 26) compared to the patients without rejection (NR, n = 37). Data is shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test. *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
Fig 2. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Fig 2. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Patients with and without acute cellular rejection could be discriminated by miR-142-3p (AUC = 0.78, CI95% = 0.67 to 0.89), miR-101-3p (AUC = 0.75, CI95% = 0.62 to 0.87), miR-424-5p (AUC = 0.73, CI95% = 0.60 to 0.86), miR-27a-3p (AUC = 0.72, CI95% = 0.59 to 0.85), miR-339-3p (AUC = 0.71, CI95% = 0.57 to 0.84), miR-144-3p (AUC = 0.70, CI95% = 0.56 to 0.83) and miR-326 (AUC = 0.69, CI95% = 0.56 to 0.82).
Fig 3. MicroRNA fold change in serum…
Fig 3. MicroRNA fold change in serum sample of heart transplant patients reported by time post-transplantation.
A) MiR-142-3p fold change and B) MiR-101-3p fold change (≤1 month, n = 14(NR) and n = 13(ACR); >1–3 months, n = 13(NR) and n = 6(ACR); >3–6 months, n = 7(NR) and n = 4(ACR); >6–12 months, n = 3(NR) and n = 3(ACR). All data are mean ±SEM, Student’s t-test, **p<0.01).
Fig 4. CRP level and microRNAs fold…
Fig 4. CRP level and microRNAs fold change in heart transplant patients.
(A) There is no significant difference between mean CRP level in acute cellular rejection group (n = 4) compared to the non-rejection group (n = 7) of heart transplant patients (NR = 32.2 mg/L vs. ACR = 3.5 mg/L, p = 0.1) and (B) There is no correlation between CRP level in heart transplant patients and miR-142-3p fold change (n = 11; R2 = 0.06 and P = 0.47) or miR-101-3p fold change (n = 11; R2 = 0.01 and P = 0.75).
Fig 5. Calcineurin inhibitor levels and microRNA…
Fig 5. Calcineurin inhibitor levels and microRNA fold change in heart transplant patients.
(A) There is no significant difference between mean tacrolimus level in acute cellular rejection group (n = 5) compared to the non-rejection group (n = 24) of heart transplant patients (NR = 12.9 ug/L vs. ACR = 10.4 ug/L, p = 0.4) and (B) There are no correlations between miR-142-3p fold change and tacrolimus (n = 29; R2 = 0.05; p = 0.25) or cyclosporin (n = 6; R2 = 0.07; p = 0.61) and there are no correlations between miR-101-3p fold change and tacrolimus (n = 29; R2 = 0.01; p = 0.10) or cyclosporine (n = 6; R2 = 0.05; p = 0.68).
Fig 6. Creatinine level and microRNAs fold…
Fig 6. Creatinine level and microRNAs fold change in heart transplant patients.
(A) There is no significant difference between mean creatinine level in ACR group (n = 26) vs. NR group (n = 37) in heart transplant patients (NR = 133.2 umol/L vs. ACR = 105.7 umol/L, p = 0.055). (B) There is no correlation between creatinine levels and miR-142-3p (R2 = 0.02, p = 0.24) or miR-101-3p (R2 = 0.06, p = 0.06) in heart transplant patients.

References

    1. Stehlik J, Starling RC, Movsesian MA, Fang JC, Brown RN, et al. (2006) Utility of long-term surveillance endomyocardial biopsy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant 25: 1402–1409. 10.1016/j.healun.2006.10.003
    1. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Dipchand AI, Benden C, et al. (2013) The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirtieth Official Adult Heart Transplant Report—2013; focus theme: age. J Heart Lung Transplant 32: 951–964. 10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.006
    1. Winters GL, McManus BM (1996) Consistencies and controversies in the application of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation for heart transplant biopsy specimens. Rapamycin Cardiac Rejection Treatment Trial Pathologists. J Heart Lung Transplant 15: 728–735.
    1. Nielsen H, Sorensen FB, Nielsen B, Bagger JP, Thayssen P, et al. (1993) Reproducibility of the acute rejection diagnosis in human cardiac allografts. The Stanford Classification and the International Grading System. J Heart Lung Transplant 12: 239–243.
    1. Pham MX, Teuteberg JJ, Kfoury AG, Starling RC, Deng MC, et al. (2010) Gene-expression profiling for rejection surveillance after cardiac transplantation. N Engl J Med 362: 1890–1900. 10.1056/NEJMoa0912965
    1. Heidt S, San Segundo D, Shankar S, Mittal S, Muthusamy AS, et al. (2011) Peripheral blood sampling for the detection of allograft rejection: biomarker identification and validation. Transplantation 92: 1–9. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318218e978
    1. Roedder S, Vitalone M, Khatri P, Sarwal MM (2011) Biomarkers in solid organ transplantation: establishing personalized transplantation medicine. Genome Med 3: 37 10.1186/gm253
    1. Etheridge A, Lee I, Hood L, Galas D, Wang K (2011) Extracellular microRNA: a new source of biomarkers. Mutat Res 717: 85–90. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.03.004
    1. Gilad S, Meiri E, Yogev Y, Benjamin S, Lebanony D, et al. (2008) Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS One 3: e3148 10.1371/journal.pone.0003148
    1. Mas VR, Dumur CI, Scian MJ, Gehrau RC, Maluf DG (2013) MicroRNAs as biomarkers in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 13: 11–19.
    1. Sukma Dewi I, Torngren K, Gidlof O, Kornhall B, Ohman J (2013) Altered serum miRNA profiles during acute rejection after heart transplantation: potential for non-invasive allograft surveillance. J Heart Lung Transplant 32: 463–466. 10.1016/j.healun.2012.12.007
    1. Blondal T, Jensby Nielsen S, Baker A, Andreasen D, Mouritzen P, et al. (2013) Assessing sample and miRNA profile quality in serum and plasma or other biofluids. Methods 59: S1–6. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.09.015
    1. O'Connell RM, Rao DS, Chaudhuri AA, Baltimore D (2010) Physiological and pathological roles for microRNAs in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 111–122. 10.1038/nri2708
    1. Spiegel JC, Lorenzen JM, Thum T (2011) Role of microRNAs in immunity and organ transplantation. Expert Rev Mol Med 13: e37 10.1017/S1462399411002080
    1. Harris A, Krams SM, Martinez OM (2010) MicroRNAs as immune regulators: implications for transplantation. Am J Transplant 10: 713–719. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03032.x
    1. Sun Y, Tawara I, Zhao M, Qin ZS, Toubai T, et al. (2013) Allogeneic T cell responses are regulated by a specific miRNA-mRNA network. J Clin Invest 123: 4739–4754. 10.1172/JCI70013
    1. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, et al. (2008) Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 10513–10518. 10.1073/pnas.0804549105
    1. Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM, Ruf IK, Pritchard CC, et al. (2011) Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 5003–5008. 10.1073/pnas.1019055108
    1. Manolio T (2003) Novel risk markers and clinical practice. N Engl J Med 349: 1587–1589. 10.1056/NEJMp038136
    1. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA (2007) Benchmarks for the assessment of novel cardiovascular biomarkers. Circulation 115: 949–952. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.683110
    1. Gautam A, Kumar R, Dimitrov G, Hoke A, Hammamieh R, et al. (2016) Identification of extracellular miRNA in archived serum samples by next-generation sequencing from RNA extracted using multiple methods. Mol Biol Rep.
    1. Rounge TB, Lauritzen M, Langseth H, Enerly E, Lyle R, et al. (2015) microRNA Biomarker Discovery and High-Throughput DNA Sequencing Are Possible Using Long-term Archived Serum Samples. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24: 1381–1387. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0289
    1. Deng MC, Eisen HJ, Mehra MR (2006) Methodological challenges of genomic research—the CARGO study. Am J Transplant 6: 1086–1087. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01305.x
    1. Starling RC, Pham M, Valantine H, Miller L, Eisen H, et al. (2006) Molecular testing in the management of cardiac transplant recipients: initial clinical experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 25: 1389–1395. 10.1016/j.healun.2006.10.002
    1. Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, Anderson A, Chan M, et al. (2010) The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 29: 914–956. 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.034
    1. Kobashigawa J, Patel J, Azarbal B, Kittleson M, Chang D, et al. (2015) Randomized pilot trial of gene expression profiling versus heart biopsy in the first year after heart transplant: early invasive monitoring attenuation through gene expression trial. Circ Heart Fail 8: 557–564. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001658
    1. Hollander Z, Chen V, Sidhu K, Lin D, Ng RT, et al. (2013) Predicting acute cardiac rejection from donor heart and pre-transplant recipient blood gene expression. J Heart Lung Transplant 32: 259–265. 10.1016/j.healun.2012.11.008
    1. Huang B, Zhao J, Lei Z, Shen S, Li D, et al. (2009) miR-142-3p restricts cAMP production in CD4+CD25- T cells and CD4+CD25+ TREG cells by targeting AC9 mRNA. EMBO Rep 10: 180–185. 10.1038/embor.2008.224
    1. Danger R, Pallier A, Giral M, Martinez-Llordella M, Lozano JJ, et al. (2012) Upregulation of miR-142-3p in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of operationally tolerant patients with a renal transplant. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 597–606. 10.1681/ASN.2011060543
    1. Van Aelst LN, Summer G, Li S, Gupta SK, Heggermont W, et al. (2015) RNA Profiling in Human and Murine Transplanted Hearts: Identification and Validation of Therapeutic Targets for Acute Cardiac and Renal Allograft Rejection. Am J Transplant.
    1. Asaoka T, Sotolongo B, Island ER, Tryphonopoulos P, Selvaggi G, et al. (2012) MicroRNA signature of intestinal acute cellular rejection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded mucosal biopsies. Am J Transplant 12: 458–468. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03807.x
    1. Duong Van Huyen JP, Tible M, Gay A, Guillemain R, Aubert O, et al. (2014) MicroRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers of heart transplant rejection. Eur Heart J 35: 3194–3202. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu346
    1. Wei L, Gong X, Martinez OM, Krams SM (2013) Differential expression and functions of microRNAs in liver transplantation and potential use as non-invasive biomarkers. Transpl Immunol 29: 123–129. 10.1016/j.trim.2013.08.005

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren