A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma

Min-Shan Chen, Jin-Qing Li, Yun Zheng, Rong-Ping Guo, Hui-Hong Liang, Ya-Qi Zhang, Xiao-Jun Lin, Wan Y Lau, Min-Shan Chen, Jin-Qing Li, Yun Zheng, Rong-Ping Guo, Hui-Hong Liang, Ya-Qi Zhang, Xiao-Jun Lin, Wan Y Lau

Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of percutaneous local ablative therapy (PLAT) with surgical resection in the treatment of solitary and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Summary background data: PLAT is effective in small HCC. Whether it is as effective as surgical resection in the long-term survivals remains unknown.

Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial on 180 patients with a solitary HCC <or=5 cm to receive either PLAT or surgical resection. The patients were regularly followed up after treatment with physical examination, blood, and radiologic tests.

Results: Of the 90 patients who were randomized to PLAT, only 71 received PLAT because 19 withdrew their consent. Of the 90 patients who were randomized to surgical resection, a single Couinaud liver segment resection was carried out in 69 patients, 2 segments in 16 patients, and 3 or more segments in 3 patients. Ethanol injection was given during open surgery in 2 patients. Only 1 patient died after surgical resection within the same hospital admission. Posttreatment complications were more often and severe after surgery than PLAT. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates after PLAT and surgery were 95.8%, 82.1%, 71.4%, 67.9% and 93.3%, 82.3%, 73.4%, 64.0%, respectively. The corresponding disease-free survival rates were 85.9%, 69.3%, 64.1%, 46.4% and 86.6%, 76.8%, 69%, 51.6%, respectively. Statistically, there was no difference between these 2 treatments.

Conclusion: PLAT was as effective as surgical resection in the treatment of solitary and small HCC. PLAT had the advantage over surgical resection in being less invasive.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1448947/bin/6FF1.jpg
FIGURE 1. Patient numbers for the intention-to-treat analysis.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1448947/bin/6FF2.jpg
FIGURE 2. Overall and disease-free survivals for patients randomized to percutaneous local ablative therapy (PLAT, n = 90, including 19 patients who withdrew their consent after randomization and received surgical resection) or surgical resection (SR).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1448947/bin/6FF3.jpg
FIGURE 3. Overall and disease-free survivals for patients randomized to percutaneous local ablative therapy (PLAT, n = 90, including 19 patients who withdrew their consent after randomization and received surgical resection) or surgical resection (SR) for tumors less than 3 cm (A), and between 3.1 cm and 5 cm (B).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1448947/bin/6FF4.jpg
FIGURE 4. Overall and disease-free survivals for patients treated with percutaneous local ablative therapy (PLAT, n = 71) or surgical resection (SR, n = 90).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1448947/bin/6FF5.jpg
FIGURE 5. Overall and disease-free survivals with percutaneous local ablative therapy (PLAT, n = 71) and surgical resection (SR, n = 90) for tumor less than 3 cm (A), and between 3.1 cm and 5 cm (B).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren