Neutrophil elastase in amniotic fluid as a predictor of preterm birth after emergent cervical cerclage

Yuko Hatakeyama, Hiroshi Miura, Akira Sato, Yohei Onodera, Naoki Sato, Dai Shimizu, Yukiyo Kumazawa, Hiroyuki Sanada, Hideto Hirano, Yukihiro Terada, Yuko Hatakeyama, Hiroshi Miura, Akira Sato, Yohei Onodera, Naoki Sato, Dai Shimizu, Yukiyo Kumazawa, Hiroyuki Sanada, Hideto Hirano, Yukihiro Terada

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate neutrophil elastase (NE) in amniotic fluid as a potential marker for predicting pregnancy continuation.

Material and methods: We enrolled 34 pregnant women with bulging fetal membrane during the second trimester who underwent emergent cerclage after confirming the absence of intrauterine infection (amniotic fluid glucose ≥15 mg/dL). Amniotic fluid NE levels were compared between women who completed and did not complete 30, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation, and the optimal cut-off value for predicting pregnancy continuation was estimated. Moreover, the differences in the duration of continued pregnancy were compared between women with NE levels above and below the optimal cut-off value.

Results: The optimal cut-off value for NE in amniotic fluid that predicted pregnancy continuation beyond 30, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation was 180 ng/mL; this cut-off value had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 84.0, 77.8, 91.3, and 63.7% beyond 30 weeks of gestation; 87.5, 80.0, 91.5, and 72.3% beyond 34 weeks of gestation; and 85.0, 71.4, 80.9, and 76.9% beyond 36 weeks of gestation, respectively. The duration of continued pregnancy from emergent cerclage to delivery was significantly longer in women with amniotic fluid NE <180 ng/mL (95.1 ± 5.4 days) than in women with amniotic fluid NE ≥180 ng/mL (44.8 ± 14.3 days).

Conclusion: The NE levels in amniotic fluid may serve as a useful marker for predicting the duration of continued pregnancy after cervical cerclage.

Keywords: Amniotic fluid; cervical cerclage; glucose; neutrophil elastase; pregnancy; premature birth.

© 2016 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristics curves of amniotic fluid concentrations of neutrophil elastase (ng/mL) for predicting delivery beyond 30 (a), 34 (b), and 36 (c) weeks of gestation. AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curve of the duration from cervical cerclage to delivery (latency).

References

    1. Abu Hashim H, Al‐Inany H, Kilani Z. A review of the contemporary evidence on rescue cervical cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124:198–203.
    1. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta‐analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:663–71.
    1. Khan MJ, Ali G, Al Tajir G, Sulieman H. Evaluation of outcomes associated with placement of elective, urgent, and emergency cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62:660–4.
    1. Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:221–6.
    1. Nelson L, Dola T, Tran T, Carter M, Luu H, Dola C. Pregnancy outcomes following placement of elective, urgent and emergent cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:269–73.
    1. Kurup M, Goldkrand JW. Cervical incompetence: elective, emergent, or urgent cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:240–6.
    1. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Reed J, van Gaalen J, Balducci J. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1098–105.
    1. D Laskin M, Yinon Y, Whittle WL. Preterm premature rupture of membranes in the presence of cerclage: is the risk for intra‐uterine infection and adverse neonatal outcome increased? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:424–8.
    1. Miura H, Ogawa M, Hirano H, Sanada H, Sato A, Obara M, et al. Neutrophil elastase and interleukin‐6 in amniotic fluid as indicators of chorioamnionitis and funisitis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158:209–13.
    1. Rivero‐Marcotegui A, Larrañaga‐Azcárate C, Ceres‐Ruiz R, García‐Merlo S. Polymorphonuclear elastase and interleukin‐6 in amniotic fluid in preterm labor. Clin Chem. 1997;43:857–9.
    1. Kidokoro K, Furuhashi M, Kuno N, Ishikawa K. Amniotic fluid neutrophil elastase and lactate dehydrogenase: association with histologic chorioamnionitis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:669–74.
    1. Park CW, Moon KC, Park JS, Jun JK, Romero R, Yoon BH. The involvement of human amnion in histologic chorioamnionitis is an indicator that a fetal and an intra‐amniotic inflammatory response is more likely and severe: clinical implications. Placenta. 2009;30:56–61.
    1. Tsuda A, Hirano H, Isobe K, Ikegami T, Ogawa M, Tanaka T. Relationship between the effects of antibiotics treatment and the concentrations of polymorphonuclear elastase, interleukin‐6 and interleukin‐8 in amniotic fluid in patients with chorioamnionitis (author's transl). Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn. 1997;49:1091–8.
    1. Tsuda A, Ikegami T, Hirano H, Sanada H, Ogawa M, Sasaki M, et al. The relationship between amniotic fluid interleukin‐6 concentration and histologic evidence of chorioamnionitis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:515–20.
    1. Hillier SL, Witkin SS, Krohn MA, Watts DH, Kiviat NB, Eschenbach DA. The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:941–8.
    1. Saito S, Kasahara T, Kato Y, Ishihara Y, Ichijo M. Elevation of amniotic fluid interleukin 6 (IL‐6), IL‐8 and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) in term and preterm parturition. Cytokine. 1993;5:81–8.
    1. Coultrip LL, Lien JM, Gomez R, Kapernick P, Khoury A, Grossman JH. The value of amniotic fluid interleukin‐6 determination in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes in the detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:901–11.
    1. Negishi H, Yamada H, Mikuni M, Kishida T, Okuyama K, Sagawa T, et al. Correlation between cytokine levels of amniotic fluid and histological chorioamnionitis in preterm delivery. J Perinat Med. 1996;24:633–9.
    1. Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Diamond MP, Kenney JS, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose, interleukin‐6, and gram stain in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:805–16.
    1. Mays JK, Figueroa R, Shah J, Khakoo H, Kaminsky S, Tejani N. Amniocentesis for selection before rescue cerclage. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:652–5.
    1. Ochi M, Ishikawa K, Itoh H, Miwa S, Fujimura Y, Kimura T, et al. Aggressive management of prolapsed fetal membranes earlier than 26 weeks’ gestation by emergent McDonald cerclage combined with amniocentesis and bladder overfilling. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;46:301–7.
    1. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, van Geijn HP. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:907–10.
    1. Stupin JH, David M, Siedentopf JP, Dudenhausen JW. Emergency cerclage versus bed‐rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139:32–7.
    1. Schorr SJ, Morales WJ. Obstetric management of incompetent cervix and bulging fetal membranes. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:235–8.
    1. Ventolini G, Genrich TJ, Roth J, Neiger R. Pregnancy outcome after placement of ‘rescue’ Shirodkar cerclage. J Perinatol. 2009;29:276–9.
    1. Debby A, Sadan O, Glezerman M, Golan A. Favorable outcome following emergency second trimester cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;96:16–9.
    1. Makino Y, Makino I, Tsujioka H, Kawarabayashi T. Amnioreduction in patients with bulging prolapsed membranes out of the cervix and vaginal orifice in cervical cerclage. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:140–8.
    1. Diago Almela VJ, Martínez‐Varea A, Perales‐Puchalt A, Alonso‐Díaz R, Perales A. Good prognosis of cerclage in cases of cervical insufficiency when intra‐amniotic inflammation/infection is ruled out. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1563–8.
    1. Lee KY, Jun HA, Kim HB, Kang SW. Interleukin‐6, but not relaxin, predicts outcome of rescue cerclage in women with cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:784–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren