Identifying regional variation in the prevalence of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clara Calvert, Sara L Thomas, Carine Ronsmans, Karen S Wagner, Alma J Adler, Veronique Filippi, Clara Calvert, Sara L Thomas, Carine Ronsmans, Karen S Wagner, Alma J Adler, Veronique Filippi

Abstract

Objective: To provide regional estimates of the prevalence of maternal haemorrhage and explore the effect of methodological differences between studies on any observed regional variation.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the prevalence of maternal haemorrhage, defined as blood loss greater than or equal to 1) 500 ml or 2) 1000 ml in the antepartum, intrapartum or postpartum period. We obtained regional estimates of the prevalence of maternal and severe maternal haemorrhage by conducting meta-analyses and used meta-regression to explore potential sources of between-study heterogeneity.

Findings: No studies reported the prevalence of antepartum haemorrhage (APH) according to our definitions. The prevalence of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (blood loss ≥500 ml) ranged from 7.2% in Oceania to 25.7% in Africa. The prevalence of severe PPH (blood loss ≥1000 ml) was highest in Africa at 5.1% and lowest in Asia at 1.9%. There was strong evidence of between-study heterogeneity in the prevalence of PPH and severe PPH in most regions. Meta-regression analyses suggested that region and method of measurement of blood loss influenced prevalence estimates for both PPH and severe PPH. The regional patterns changed after adjusting for the other predictors of PPH indicating that, compared with European women, Asian women have a lower prevalence of PPH.

Conclusions: We found evidence that Asian women have a very low prevalence of PPH compared with women in Europe. However, more reliable estimates will only be obtained with the standardisation of the measurement of PPH so that the data from different regions are comparable.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Study selection for inclusion in…
Figure 1. Study selection for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

References

    1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PFA. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2006;367:1066–1074.
    1. AbouZahr C. Global burden of maternal death and disability. British Medical Bulletin. 2003;67:1–11.
    1. Sentilhes L, Gromez A, Clavier E, Resch B, Descamps P, et al. Long-term psychological impact of severe postpartum hemorrhage. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica: no-no. 2011.
    1. Craigo S, Kapernick P. DeCherney A, Pernoll M, editors. Postpartum Hemorrhage & the Abnormal Puerperium. 1994. Obstetric & Gynecologic Diagnosis and Treatment. 8 ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange.
    1. Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;22:999–1012.
    1. Prasertcharoensuk W, Swadpanich U, Lumbiganon P. Accuracy of the blood loss estimation in the third stage of labor. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. 2000;71:69–70.
    1. Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA. Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 199. 2008;519:e511–517.
    1. Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald S. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. [update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (3): CD000007; PMID: 10908457]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2000. CD000007
    1. World Health Organisation. Proportion of births attended by a skilled health worker: 2008 updates. World Health Organisation. 2008.
    1. Seoane G, Castrillo M, O’Rourke K. A validation study of maternal self reports of obstetrical complications: implications for health surveys. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1998;62:229–236.
    1. Ronsmans C, Achadi E, Cohen S, Zazri A. Women’s recall of obstetric complications in south Kalimantan, Indonesia. Studies in Family Planning. 1997;28:203–214.
    1. Freeman M, Tukey J. Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root. The Annuals of Mathematical Statistics. 1950;21:607–611.
    1. Stuart A, Ord J. Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics. London: Arnold Publishers. 1994.
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1986;7:177–188.
    1. Begley Cm, Gyte Gillian Ml, Murphy DJ, Devane D, McDonald SJ, et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7. 2010.
    1. Ohkuchi A, Onagawa T, Usui R, Koike T, Hiratsuka M, et al. Effect of maternal age on blood loss during parturition: a retrospective multivariate analysis of 10,053 cases. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2003;31:209–215.
    1. Koh E, Devendra K, Tan LK. B-Lynch suture for the treatment of uterine atony. Singapore Medical Journal. 2009;50:693–697.
    1. Ng PS, Chan AS, Sin WK, Tang LC, Cheung KB, et al. A multicentre randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and i.m. syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labour. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:31–35.
    1. Alfirevic Z, Edwards G, Platt MJ. The impact of delivery suite guidelines on intrapartum care in ‘standard primigravida’. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Biology. 2004;115:28–31.
    1. Abou Omar AA. Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage, safety and efficacy. Saudi Med J 22 1118–1121. 2001.
    1. Amelink-Verburg MP, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Hakkenberg RMA, Veldhuijzen IME, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, et al. Evaluation of 280,000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;115:570–578.
    1. Davies GAL, Tessier JL, Woodman MC, Lipson A, Hahn PM. Maternal hemodynamics after oxytocin bolus compared with infusion in the third stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;105:294–299.
    1. Jackson Jr KW, Allbert JR, Schemmer GK, Elliot M, Humphrey A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing oxytocin administration before and after placental delivery in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;185:873–877.
    1. Schmidt N, Abelsen B, Oian P. Deliveries in maternity homes in Norway: Results from a 2-year prospective study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2002;81:731–737.
    1. Marchant S, Alexander J, Thomas P, Garcia J, Brocklehurst P, et al. Risk factors for hospital admission related to excessive and/or prolonged postpartum vaginal blood loss after the first 24 h following childbirth. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2006;20:392–402.
    1. Matsubara S, Ohkuchi A, Kikkawa M, Izumi A, Kuwata T, et al. Blood loss in low-lying placenta: placental edge to cervical internal os distance of less vs. more than 2 cm. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2008;36:507–512.
    1. Knight M, Callaghan W, Berg C, Alexander S, Bouvier-Colle M-H, et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2009;9:55.
    1. Joseph KS, Rouleau J, Kramer MS, Young DC, Liston RM, et al. Investigation of an increase in postpartum haemorrhage in Canada. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2007;114:751–759.
    1. Robinson HE, O’Connell CM, Joseph KS, McLeod NL. Maternal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by Obesity. Obstetrics & Gynecology 106: 1357–1364 1310.1097/1301.AOG.0000188387.0000188032.0000188341. 2005.
    1. James PT, Leach R, Kalamara E, Shayeghi M. The Worldwide Obesity Epidemic. Obesity. 2001;9:228S–233S.
    1. Hoj L, Cardoso P, Nielsen BB, Hvidman L, Nielsen J, et al. Effect of sublingual misoprostol on severe postpartum haemorrhage in a primary health centre in Guinea-Bissau: Randomised double blind clinical trial. British Medical Journal. 2005;331:723–727.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren