Effects of selenium supplementation on selenoprotein gene expression and response to influenza vaccine challenge: a randomised controlled trial

Andrew J Goldson, Susan J Fairweather-Tait, Charlotte N Armah, Yongping Bao, Martin R Broadley, Jack R Dainty, Caroline Furniss, David J Hart, Birgit Teucher, Rachel Hurst, Andrew J Goldson, Susan J Fairweather-Tait, Charlotte N Armah, Yongping Bao, Martin R Broadley, Jack R Dainty, Caroline Furniss, David J Hart, Birgit Teucher, Rachel Hurst

Abstract

Background: The uncertainty surrounding dietary requirements for selenium (Se) is partly due to limitations in biomarkers of Se status that are related to health outcomes. In this study we determined the effect of different doses and forms of Se on gene expression of selenoprotein S (SEPS1), selenoprotein W (SEPW1) and selenoprotein R (SEPR), and responses to an immune function challenge, influenza vaccine, were measured in order to identify functional markers of Se status.

Methods and findings: A 12 week human dietary intervention study was undertaken in 119 volunteers who received placebo, 50, 100 or 200 µg/day Se-enriched yeast (Se-yeast) or meals containing unenriched or Se-enriched onions (50 µg/day). Gene expression was quantified in RNA samples extracted from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC's) using quantitative RT-PCR. There was a significant increase in SEPW1 mRNA in the Se-enriched onion group (50 µg/day) compared with the unenriched onion group. SEPR and SEPW1 did not change significantly over the duration of the supplementation period in the control or Se-yeast groups, except at week 10 when SEPW1 mRNA levels were significantly lower in the 200 µg/day Se-yeast group compared to the placebo group. Levels of SEPS1 mRNA increased significantly 7 days after the influenza vaccine challenge, the magnitude of the increase in SEPS1 gene expression was dose-dependent, with a significantly greater response with higher Se supplementation.

Conclusions: This novel finding provides preliminary evidence for a role of SEPS1 in the immune response, and further supports the relationship between Se status and immune function.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00279812].

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Plasma Se concentration over the…
Figure 1. Plasma Se concentration over the 12 week intervention period for all groups.
Values are means ± SEM. □ Placebo (n = 20); ▪ 50 µg/day Se-yeast (n = 17); ♦ 100 µg/day Se-yeast (n = 21); ×200 µg/day Se-yeast (n = 23); ○ Unenriched onions (n = 16); • 50 µg/day Se-enriched onion meals (n = 18). ▴ denotes influenza vaccine challenge administered at week 10 of the study. Plasma Se concentration data displayed for weeks 11 and 12, one and two weeks post-vaccination, are novel data. To display the effect of Se supplementation over the duration of the intervention period and to illustrate the plasma Se concentration before and after vaccination, data from time points baseline, week 6 and 10 are reproduced with permission of Hurstet al. 2010 .
Figure 2. mRNA level in PBMCs measured…
Figure 2. mRNA level in PBMCs measured over the duration of intervention period for (A) SEPW1, (B) SEPS1, (C) SEPR in the placebo and Se-yeast groups.
Values are means ± SEM relative to baseline, week 0 expression. GUSB was used as reference gene for normalisation. White bars  =  placebo group (n = 14 to 20); light grey bars  =  50 µg/day Se-yeast (n = 11 to 15); mid grey bars  =  100 µg/day Se-yeast (n = 10 to 19); black bars  =  200 µg/day Se-yeast (n = 14 to 18). The variation in sample number (n) between time points for each treatment is due to insufficient RNA at some sampling time points and missing time course sample data for some of the target genes. For the SEPS1 gene expression data set: placebo group n = 20 at all time points; 50 µg/day group n = 14 at wks 0, 6 and 12 (n = 13 at wks 10, 11); 100 µg/day group n = 19 at wks 0, 6, 10 (n = 18 at wks 11, 12); 200 µg/day group n = 18 at wks 0, 6, 12 (n = 17 wk 10, n = 15 wk 11). Data were analysed using mixed-effects models and statistically significant differences are indicated on the figure.
Figure 3. SEPS1 mRNA level in PMBCs…
Figure 3. SEPS1 mRNA level in PMBCs measured over the intervention period, each time point showing the mean of all the yeast supplement groups (placebo, 50, 100 and 200 µg/day).
GUSB was used as reference gene for normalisation. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 65 to 71 per time point) relative to baseline, week 0 expression.
Figure 4. SEPW1, SEPS1 and SEPR mRNA…
Figure 4. SEPW1, SEPS1 and SEPR mRNA level over the duration of the intervention in the PBMC samples from the unenriched and Se-enriched onion meal groups.
SEPW1, SEPS1 and SEPR mRNA levels were quantified using real time RT-PCR and normalised to reference gene, GUSB. Data expressed are means ± SEM relative to baseline, week 0 expression. (A) SEPW1, (B) SEPS1, (C) SEPR. Values are means ± SEM. ---○--- unenriched onions, n = 14 to 16;—•— Se-enriched onions, n = 16 to 17. SEPW1 mRNA level is significantly greater in the enriched onion group compared to the unenriched onion group (p = 0.012). SEPS1 mRNA level is significantly influenced by week (p = 0.009).

References

    1. Rayman MP. Food-chain selenium and human health: emphasis on intake. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:254–268.
    1. Bleys J, Navas-Acien A, Guallar E. Serum selenium levels and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:404–410.
    1. Combs GF., Jr Impact of selenium and cancer-prevention findings on the nutrition-health paradigm. Nutr Cancer. 2001;40:6–11.
    1. Marmot M, Atinmo T, Byers T, Chen J, Hirohata T, et al. Research report. WCRF/AICR Expert Report. Washington: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. pp. 109–11.
    1. Clark LC, Combs GF, Jr, Turnbull BW, Slate EH, Chalker DK, et al. Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized controlled trial. Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group. JAMA. 1996;276:1957–63.
    1. Ip C, Hayes C, Budnick RM, Ganther HE. Chemical form of selenium, critical metabolites, and cancer prevention. Cancer Res. 1991;51:595–600.
    1. Hoffmann PR, Berry MJ. The influence of selenium on immune responses. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52:1273–80.
    1. Broome CS, McArdle F, Kyle JA, Andrews F, Lowe NM, et al. An increase in selenium intake improves immune function and poliovirus handling in adults with marginal selenium status. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:154–62.
    1. Rayman MP. Dietary selenium: time to act. BMJ. 1997;314:387–8.
    1. Thomson CD. Assessment of requirements for selenium and adequacy of selenium status: a review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:391–402.
    1. Burk RF, Norsworthy BK, Hill KE, Motley AK, Byrne DW. Effects of chemical form of selenium on plasma biomarkers in a high-dose human supplementation trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:804–10.
    1. Neve J. Human selenium supplementation as assessed by changes in blood selenium concentration and glutathione peroxidase activity. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 1995;9:65–73.
    1. Burk RF, Hill KE, Motley AK. Plasma selenium in specific and non-specific forms. Biofactors. 2001;14:107–14.
    1. Patching SG, Gardiner PH. Recent developments in selenium metabolism and chemical speciation: a review. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 1999;13:193–214.
    1. Kryukov GV, Castellano S, Novoselov SV, Lobanov AV, Zehtab O, et al. Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes. Science. 2003;300:1439–43.
    1. Elsom R, Sanderson P, Hesketh JE, Jackson MJ, Fairweather-Tait SJ, et al. Functional markers of selenium status: UK Food Standards Agency workshop report. Br J Nutr. 2006;96:980–84.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium and carotenoids. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
    1. Brown KM, Pickard K, Nicol F, Beckett GJ, Duthie GG, et al. Effects of organic and inorganic selenium supplementation on selenoenzyme activity in blood lymphocytes, granulocytes, platelets and erythrocytes. Clin Sci (Lond) 2000;98:593–9.
    1. Ashton K, Hooper L, Harvey LJ, Hurst R, Casgrain A, et al. Methods of assessment of selenium status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:2025S–2039S.
    1. Xia Y, Hill KE, Byrne DW, Xu J, Burk RF. Effectiveness of selenium supplements in a low-selenium area of China. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:829–34.
    1. Jeong D, Kim TS, Chung YW, Lee BJ, Kim IY. Selenoprotein W is a glutathione-dependent antioxidant in vivo. FEBS Lett. 2002;517:225–8.
    1. Kryukov GV, Kumar RA, Koc A, Sun Z, Gladyshev VN. Selenoprotein R is a zinc-containing stereo-specific methionine sulfoxide reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:4245–50.
    1. Ye Y, Shibata Y, Yun C, Ron D, Rapoport TA. A membrane protein complex mediates retro-translocation from the ER lumen into the cytosol. Nature. 2004;429:841–7.
    1. Hurst R, Armah CN, Hart DJ, Teucher B, Dainty JR, et al. Establishing optimal selenium status: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nut. 2010;91:923–931.
    1. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding (1976). Anal Biochem. 72:248–54.
    1. Drabkin DL. The standardization of hemoglobin measurement. Am J Med Sci. 1949;217:710.
    1. Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 1967;70:158–69.
    1. Smith AD, Levander OA. High-throughput 96-well microplate assays for determining specific activities of glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase. Methods Enzymol. 2002;347:113–21.
    1. Thomson CD. Selenium-dependent and non-selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase in human tissues of New Zealand residents. Biochem Int. 1985;10:673–9.
    1. Bao Y, Chambers SJ, Williamson G. Direct separation of hydroperoxy- and hydroxy-phosphatidylcholine derivatives: application to the assay of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase. Anal Biochem. 1995;224:395–9.
    1. Eady JJ, Wortley GM, Wormstone YM, Hughes JC, Astley SB, et al. Variation in gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers. Physiol Genomics. 2005;22:402–11.
    1. Applied Biosystems Prism 7700 SDS User Bulletin #2. Available: , via the internet. Accessed 12 June 2004.
    1. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, et al. 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3 Available: via the Internet. Accessed 15 Aug 2005.
    1. Loseke S, Grage-Griebenow E, Wagner A, Gehlhar K, Bufe A. Differential expression of IFN-alpha subtypes in human PBMC: evaluation of novel real-time PCR assays. J Immunol Methods. 2003;276:207–22.
    1. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation of Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, . Accessed 23 June 2008.
    1. Thomson CD, Robinson MF, Butler JA, Whanger PD. Long-term supplementation with selenate and selenomethionine: selenium and glutathione peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.9) in blood components of New Zealand women. Br J Nutr. 1993;69:577–88.
    1. Hawkes WC, Richter BD, Alkan Z, Souza EC, Derricote M. Response of selenium status indicators to supplementation of healthy North American men with high-selenium yeast. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2008;122:107–21.
    1. Neve J, Vertongen F, Capel P. Selenium supplementation in healthy Belgian adults: response in platelet glutathione peroxidase activity and other blood indices. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:139–43.
    1. Deagen JT, Butler JA, Zachara BA, Whanger PD. Determination of the distribution of selenium between glutathione peroxidase, selenoprotein P, and albumin in plasma. Anal Biochem. 1993;208:176–81.
    1. Akesson B, Bellew T, Burk RF. Purification of selenoprotein P from human plasma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1204:243–9.
    1. Arab L. Individualized nutritional recommendations: do we have the measurements needed to assess risk and make dietary recommendations? Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:167–72.
    1. Kussmann M, Raymond F, Affolter M. OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. J Biotechnol. 2006;124:758–87.
    1. Kipp A, Banning A, van Schothorst EM, Méplan C, Schomburg L, Evelo C, et al. Four selenoproteins, protein biosynthesis, and Wnt signalling are particularly sensitive to limited selenium intake in mouse colon. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:1561–72.
    1. Barnes KM, Evenson JK, Raines AM, Sunde RA. Transcript analysis of the selenoproteome indicates that dietary selenium requirements of rats based on selenium-regulated selenoprotein mRNA levels are uniformly less than those based on glutathione peroxidase activity. J Nutr. 2009;139(2):199–206. Available: via the internet. Accessed 12 Oct 2009.
    1. Hadley KB, Sunde RA. Selenium regulation of thioredoxin reductase activity and mRNA levels in rat liver. J Nutr Biochemistry. 2001;12:693–702.
    1. Pagmantidis V, Bermano G, Villette S, Broom I, Arthur J, et al. Effects of Se-depletion on glutathione peroxidase and selenoprotein W gene expression in the colon. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:792–6.
    1. Rooseboom M, Vermeulen NP, Groot EJ, Commandeur JN. Tissue distribution of cytosolic beta-elimination reactions of selenocysteine Se-conjugates in rat and human. Chem Biol Interact. 2002;140:243–64.
    1. Sunde RA, Paterson E, Evenson JK, Barnes KM, Lovegrove JA. Longitudinal selenium status in healthy British adults: assessment using biochemical and molecular biomarkers. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(Suppl 3):S37–47.
    1. Hurst R, Elliott RM, Goldson AJ, Fairweather-Tait SJ. Se-methylselenocysteine alters collagen gene and protein expression in human prostate cells. Cancer Lett. 2008;269:117–26.
    1. Kotrebai M, Birringer M, Tyson JF, Block E, Uden PC. Selenium speciation in enriched and natural samples by HPLC-ICP-MS and HPLC-ESI-MS with perfluorinated carboxylic acid ion-pairing agents. Analyst. 2000;125:71–8.
    1. Larsen EH, Hansen M, Paulin H, Moesgaard S, Reid M, et al. Speciation and bioavailability of selenium in yeast-based intervention agents used in cancer chemoprevention studies. J AOAC Int. 2004;87:225–32.
    1. Kibriya MG, Jasmine F, Argos M, Verret WJ, Rakibuz-Zaman M, et al. Changes in gene expression profiles in response to selenium supplementation among individuals with arsenic-induced pre-malignant skin lesions. Toxicol Lett. 2007;169:162–76.
    1. Pagmantidis V, Meplan C, van Schothorst EM, Keijer J, Hesketh JE. Supplementation of healthy volunteers with nutritionally relevant amounts of selenium increases the expression of lymphocyte protein biosynthesis genes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:181–9.
    1. Barnes KM, Evenson JK, Raines AM, Sunde RA. Transcript analysis of the selenoproteome indicates that dietary selenium requirements of rats based on selenium-regulated selenoprotein mRNA levels are uniformly less than those based on glutathione peroxidase activity. J Nutr. 2009;139:199–206.
    1. Sunde RA, Raines AM, Barnes KM, Evenson JK. Selenium status highly regulates selenoprotein mRNA levels for only a subset of the selenoproteins in the selenoproteome. Biosci Rep. 2009;29:329–38.
    1. Curran JE, Jowett JB, Elliott KS, Gao Y, Gluschenko K, et al. Genetic variation in selenoprotein S influences inflammatory response. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1234–41.
    1. Gao Y, Hannan NR, Wanyonyi S, Konstantopolous N, Pagnon J, et al. Activation of the selenoprotein SEPS1 gene expression by pro-inflammatory cytokines in HepG2 cells. Cytokine. 2006;33:246–51.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren