Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Nikita A Nekliudov, Petr V Tsarkov, Inna A Tulina, Nikita A Nekliudov, Petr V Tsarkov, Inna A Tulina

Abstract

Background: Colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications in rectal cancer surgery due to its negative impact on the overall as well as cancer-specific survival. Two-row stapling technique has become standard in low anterior resections (LARs), but has neither alleviated the morbidity, nor reduced the incidence of AL. This is the 1st study that aims to compare the success rate of new 3-row circular staplers compared to that of conventional 2-row staplers in a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Methods: The THREESTAPLER trial (Clinical Trials NCT03910699) is a prospective, noninferiority, 2-armed, parallel-group, patient and outcomes assessor blinded study with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Colorectal anastomosis will be formed using Ethicon 29 mm Curved Intraluminal Stapler (CDH29A) in the active comparator group, and using Mirus Disposable Circular Stapler 3 Row 29 (MCS-29R3) in the experimental group. The hypothesis states that the incidence of AL in the 3-row stapler group is at least not higher than in the 2-row stapler group. Assuming there is a difference in success rate of 12% and noninferiority margin Δ = 5%, 154 patients will be required to achieve statistical significance. An interim analysis will be performed after recruitment of 20 patients per group to assess safety profile of 3-row circular staplers. The primary endpoint is the rate of AL, documented by imaging studies, assessed with Pearson Chi-squared test and Fisher exact test. The secondary outcomes include severity of AL (A, B, or C), anastomotic bleeding, postoperative complication rate graded with the Clavien-Dindo classification, reintervention rate, stapler dysfunction rate, complications of defunctioning stoma, overall and cancer-specific quality of life, assessed with short form (36) and quality-of-life questionnaire core 30 questionnaires, respectively, fecal incontinence assessed with Cleveland clinic incontinence score form, and manifestation of LAR syndrome. All patients will be monitored for 12 months following the LAR.

Discussion: This is the 1st prospective randomized trial to assess the safety profile of 3-row staplers for colorectal anastomosis after LAR for rectal cancer. It may provide evidence of feasibility of 3-row circular staplers in LAR with respect to short-term and long-term patient outcomes.

Trial registration: NCT03910699 on 10 April 2019.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary outcome measure. AL = anastomotic leakage, CT = computed tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant timeline. AE & SAE = adverse events & serious adverse events, CCIS = Cleveland clinic incontinence score, H&P = history and physical examination, LARS = low anterior resection syndrome (questionnaire), QLQ-C30 = quality-of-life questionnaire core 30, QoL = quality of life, SF-36 = short form (36 item), VAS = visual analog scale.

References

    1. Qu H, Liu Y, Bi D. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3608–17.
    1. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2988–95.
    1. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, et al. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010;251:807–18.
    1. Wang S, Liu J, Wang S, et al. Adverse effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and survival after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2017;41:277–84.
    1. Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Rutegård J, et al. Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: anastomotic leakage and mortality after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2019;3:106–11.
    1. Moran BJ. Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1996;83:902–9.
    1. Foo CC, Chiu AHO, Yip J, et al. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3122–30.
    1. Sozutek A, Colak T, Dag A, et al. Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row 3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012;67:1035–8.
    1. Fayek IS. Evaluation of stapled versus hand-sewn techniques for colo- rectal anastomosis after low anterior resection of mid-rectal carcinoma: a study on 50 patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:5427–31.
    1. Ho Y-H. Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:1610.
    1. Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Morbidity and mortality after single- and double-stapled colorectal anastomoses in patients with carcinoma of the rectum. Aust N Z J Surg 1996;66:820–3.
    1. Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Sidoti F, et al. Single and double stapled anastomoses in rectal cancer surgery; a retrospective study on the safety of the technique and its indication. Acta Chir Belg 1996;96:31–6.
    1. Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, et al. The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:275–9.
    1. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010;147:339–51.
    1. Blackwelder WC. “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1982;3:345–53.
    1. Xiao L, Zhang W, Jiang P, et al. Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study. World J Surg 2011;35:1367–77.
    1. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE. Available at: Accessed May 13, 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren