Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain and Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Dana L Dailey, Carol G T Vance, Barbara A Rakel, M Bridget Zimmerman, Jennie Embree, Ericka N Merriwether, Katharine M Geasland, Ruth Chimenti, Jon M Williams, Meenakshi Golchha, Leslie J Crofford, Kathleen A Sluka, Dana L Dailey, Carol G T Vance, Barbara A Rakel, M Bridget Zimmerman, Jennie Embree, Ericka N Merriwether, Katharine M Geasland, Ruth Chimenti, Jon M Williams, Meenakshi Golchha, Leslie J Crofford, Kathleen A Sluka

Abstract

Objective: Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by pain and fatigue, particularly during physical activity. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) activates endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms. This study was undertaken to investigate if using TENS during activity would improve movement-evoked pain and other patient-reported outcomes in women with FM.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to receive active TENS (n = 103), placebo TENS (n = 99), or no TENS (n = 99) and instructed to use it at home during activity 2 hours each day for 4 weeks. TENS was applied to the lumbar and cervicothoracic regions using a modulated frequency (2-125 Hz) at the highest tolerable intensity. Participants rated movement-evoked pain (primary outcome measure) and fatigue on an 11-point scale before and during application of TENS. The primary outcome measure and secondary patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline (time of randomization) and at 4 weeks.

Results: After 4 weeks, a greater reduction in movement-evoked pain was reported in the active TENS group versus the placebo TENS group (group mean difference -1.0 [95% confidence interval -1.8, -0.2]; P = 0.008) and versus the no TENS group (group mean difference -1.8 [95% confidence interval -2.6, -1.0]; P < 0.0001). A reduction in movement-evoked fatigue was also reported in the active TENS group versus the placebo TENS group (group mean difference -1.4 [95% confidence interval -2.4, -0.4]; P = 0.001) and versus the no TENS group (group mean difference -1.9 [95% confidence interval -2.9, -0.9]; P = <0.0001). A greater percentage of the patients in the active TENS group reported improvement on the global impression of change compared to the placebo TENS group (70% versus 31%; P < 0.0001) and the no TENS group (9%; P < 0.0001). There were no TENS-related serious adverse events, and <5% of participants experienced minor adverse events from TENS.

Conclusion: Among women who had FM and were on a stable medication regimen, 4 weeks of active TENS use compared to placebo TENS or no TENS resulted in a significant improvement in movement-evoked pain and other clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to examine effectiveness in a real-world setting to establish the clinical importance of these findings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01888640.

© 2019 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram. A, Study design for all 4 visits. At visit 1, participants were screened for pain and fibromyalgia (FM) according to the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria 32. At visit 2, subjects were re‐screened for pain and randomized into treatment (Tx) groups. Baseline questionnaires were assigned, and subjects were assessed for pain and fatigue at rest and during functional tasks. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was applied during visit 2 and remained turned on for 30 minutes prior to reassessment of pain, fatigue, and function. Participants were given the TENS unit for home use over a 4‐week period before returning for visit 3. Visit 3 followed the same protocol as visit 2. After visit 3, all subjects received active TENS for 4 weeks and were reassessed with the same protocol as visits 2 and 3. All assessments were the same across treatment arms. B, CONSORT diagram. We assessed 1,046 participants for eligibility, with 468 excluded prior to enrollment. The main reasons for exclusion were previous TENS use and a pain level of <4 on a 10‐point numerical rating scale. Following enrollment at visit 1, 5 subjects did not meet the criteria for FM, and 1 week later at visit 2, 14 subjects were excluded for having a pain level of <4. After enrollment on visit 1, 17 subjects withdrew from the study due to personal reasons. Thus, the remaining 301 participants were then randomly assigned to receive active TENS (n = 103), placebo TENS (n = 99), or no TENS (n = 99). Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.41170/abstract.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Active transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) use significantly decreased pain and fatigue in women with fibromyalgia during activity and at rest compared to placebo TENS or no TENS use, per intent‐to‐treat analysis. Graphs show movement‐evoked and resting pain and fatigue before and during treatment at visits 2 and 3. Between visits 2 and 3, participants used TENS at home for 4 weeks (dotted lines). A, Movement‐evoked pain during the 6‐minute walk test (6MWT). B, Movement‐evoked pain during a 5‐time sit‐to‐stand test (5TSTS). C, Resting pain. D, Movement‐evoked fatigue during the 6MWT. E, Movement‐evoked fatigue during the 5TSTS. F, Resting fatigue. * = P < 0.05 versus placebo TENS and no TENS. Data are the mean ± SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The active TENS group had an improved perception of change and a greater number of responders with regard to the degree of change in movement‐evoked pain or fatigue during a 6MWT compared to the placebo TENS or no TENS groups. A, The percentage of participants who reported feeling better or much better (blue), no change (green), and worse or extremely worse (red) after 4 weeks of active TENS, placebo TENS, or no TENS treatment. The majority of individuals reported a significant overall improvement after using active TENS compared to those who used placebo TENS or no TENS (P < 0.0001). There were no differences between the placebo TENS and no TENS groups (P = 0.175). B, Percentages (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) of subjects in each treatment group who had a clinically meaningful response to TENS (as described by Arnold and colleagues 43, i.e., ≥30% reduction [pain], ≥20% reduction [fatigue, function]). There was a significantly greater number of responders for pain, fatigue, and both pain and fatigue in the active TENS group compared to the placebo TENS and no TENS groups. Function was measured according to the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire 39. See Figure 2 for other definitions. Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.41170/abstract.

References

    1. Okifuji A, Hare BD. Management of fibromyalgia syndrome: review of evidence. Pain Ther 2013;2:87–104.
    1. Vincent A, Whipple MO, McAllister SJ, Aleman KM, St Sauver JL. A cross‐sectional assessment of the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions and medication use in a sample of community‐dwelling adults with fibromyalgia in Olmsted County, Minnesota. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006681.
    1. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA, for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians . Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:514–30.
    1. Macfarlane GJ, Kronisch C, Atzeni F, Häuser W, Choy EH, Amris K, et al. EULAR recommendations for management of fibromyalgia [letter]. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:e54.
    1. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:1–49.
    1. Bement MH, Sluka KA. Exercise‐induced hypoalgesia: an evidence‐based review In: Sluka KA, editor. Mechanisms and management of pain for the physical therapist. 2nd ed Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2016. p. 177–202.
    1. Bidonde J, Busch AJ, Bath B, Milosavljevic S. Exercise for adults with fibromyalgia: an umbrella systematic review with synthesis of best evidence. Curr Rheumatol Rev 2014;10:45–79.
    1. Dailey DL, Keffala VJ, Sluka KA. Do cognitive and physical fatigue tasks enhance pain, cognitive fatigue, and physical fatigue in people with fibromyalgia? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:288–96.
    1. Bair MJ, Matthias MS, Nyland KA, Huffman MA, Stubbs DL, Kroenke K, et al. Barriers and facilitators to chronic pain self‐management: a qualitative study of primary care patients with comorbid musculoskeletal pain and depression. Pain Med 2009;10:1280–90.
    1. Ma YT, Sluka KA. Reduction in inflammation‐induced sensitization of dorsal horn neurons by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in anesthetized rats. Exp Brain Res 2001;137:94–102.
    1. Sluka KA, Deacon M, Stibal A, Strissel S, Terpstra A. Spinal blockade of opioid receptors prevents the analgesia produced by TENS in arthritic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;289:840–6.
    1. Kalra A, Urban MO, Sluka KA. Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;298:257–63.
    1. Radhakrishnan R, King EW, Dickman J, Herold CA, Johnston NF, Spurgin ML, et al. Spinal 5‐HT(2) and 5‐HT(3) receptors mediate low, but not high, frequency TENS‐induced antihyperalgesia in rats. Pain 2003;105:205–13.
    1. Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag 2014;4:197–209.
    1. Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: a clinical review. JAMA 2014;311:1547–55.
    1. Sluka KA, Clauw DJ. Neurobiology of fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain. Neuroscience 2016;338:114–29.
    1. Johnson MI, Claydon LS, Herbison GP, Jones G, Paley CA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;10:CD012172.
    1. Johnson MI, Paley CA, Howe TE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;CD006142.
    1. Chen LX, Zhou ZR, Li YL, Ning GZ, Li Y, Wang XB, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with knee osteoarthritis: evidence from randomized‐controlled trials. Clin J Pain 2016;32:146–54.
    1. Resende L, Merriwether E, Rampazo ÉP, Dailey D, Embree J, Deberg J, et al. Meta‐analysis of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for relief of spinal pain. Eur J Pain 2018;22:663–78.
    1. Bennett MI, Hughes N, Johnson MI. Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: low fidelity may explain negative findings. Pain 2011;152:1226–32.
    1. Sluka KA, Bjordal JM, Marchand S, Rakel BA. What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature. Phys Ther 2013;93:1397–402.
    1. Moran F, Leonard T, Hawthorne S, Hughes CM, McCrum‐Gardner E, Johnson MI, et al. Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity. J Pain 2011;12:929–35.
    1. Rakel B, Frantz R. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement. J Pain 2003;4:455–64.
    1. Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CG, Liebano RE, Amrit AS, Bush HM, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain, fatigue and hyperalgesia while restoring central inhibition in primary fibromyalgia. Pain 2013;154:2554–62.
    1. Cowan S, McKenna J, McCrum‐Gardner E, Johnson MI, Sluka KA, Walsh DM. An investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of TENS delivered by a glove electrode. J Pain 2009;10:694–701.
    1. Sunshine W, Field TM, Quintino O, Fierro K, Kuhn C, Burman I, et al. Fibromyalgia benefits from massage therapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. J Clin Rheumatol 1996;2:18–22.
    1. Löfgren M, Norrbrink C. Pain relief in women with fibromyalgia: a cross‐over study of superficial warmth stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:557–62.
    1. Lauretti GR, Chubaci EF, Mattos AL. Efficacy of the use of two simultaneously TENS devices for fibromyalgia pain. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:2117–22.
    1. Carbonario F, Matsutani LA, Yuan SL, Marques AP. Effectiveness of high‐frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at tender points as adjuvant therapy for patients with fibromyalgia. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;49:197–204.
    1. Noehren B, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CG, Zimmerman MB, Crofford LJ, et al. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, function, and quality of life in fibromyalgia: a double‐blind randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2015;95:129–40.
    1. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia: report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–72.
    1. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.
    1. Belza BL. Comparison of self‐reported fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis and controls. J Rheumatol 1995;22:639–43.
    1. PloS One . International Physical Activity Questionnaire ‐ short form. URL: .
    1. Miller RP, Kori S, Todd D. The Tampa Scale: a measure of kinesiophobia. Clin J Pain 1991;7:51–2.
    1. Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–32.
    1. Nicholas MK. The pain self‐efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007;11:153–63.
    1. Bennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, Ward R, Han BK, Ross RL. The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R120.
    1. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF‐36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
    1. Rakel B, Cooper N, Adams HJ, Messer BR, Frey Law LA, Dannen DR, et al. A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment. J Pain 2010;11:230–8.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11‐point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149–58.
    1. Arnold LM, Williams DA, Hudson JI, Martin SA, Clauw DJ, Crofford LJ, et al. Development of responder definitions for fibromyalgia clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:885–94.
    1. Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, Cole P. Cervico‐thoracic or lumbar sympathectomy for neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;CD002918.
    1. Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Toelle T, Rice AS. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;CD007938.
    1. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 2004;8:283–91.
    1. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RL, et al. 2016 revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016;46:319–29.
    1. Dailey DL, Frey Law LA, Vance CG, Rakel BA, Merriwether EN, Darghosian L, et al. Perceived function and physical performance are associated with pain and fatigue in women with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:68.
    1. Arnold LM, Zlateva G, Sadosky A, Emir B, Whalen E. Correlations between fibromyalgia symptom and function domains and patient global impression of change: a pooled analysis of three randomized, placebo‐controlled trials of pregabalin. Pain Med 2011;12:260–7.
    1. Rampakakis E, Ste‐Marie PA, Sampalis JS, Karellis A, Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA. Real‐life assessment of the validity of patient global impression of change in fibromyalgia. RMD Open 2015;1:e000146.
    1. Arnold LM, Crofford LJ, Mease PJ, Burgess SM, Palmer SC, Abetz L, et al. Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:114–20.
    1. Okifuji A, Bradshaw DH, Donaldson GW, Turk DC. Sequential analyses of daily symptoms in women with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain 2011;12:84–93.
    1. Mease PJ, Clauw DJ, Christensen R, Crofford LJ, Gendreau RM, Martin SA, et al. Toward development of a fibromyalgia responder index and disease activity score: OMERACT module update. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1487–95.
    1. Bidonde J, Busch AJ, Schachter CL, Overend TJ, Kim SY, Góes SM, et al. Aerobic exercise training for adults with fibromyalgia [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD012700.
    1. Sluka KA, Walsh DM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential therapy In: Sluka KA, editor. Pain mechanisms and management for the physical therapist. 2nd ed Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2016. p. 203–23.
    1. Chandran P, Sluka KA. Development of opioid tolerance with repeated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation administration. Pain 2003;102:195–201.
    1. Liebano R, Rakel B, Vance CG, Walsh DM, Sluka KA. An investigation of the development of analgesic tolerance to TENS in humans. Pain 2011;152:335–42.
    1. DeSantana JM, Santana‐Filho VJ, Sluka KA. Modulation between high‐ and low‐frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation delays the development of analgesic tolerance in arthritic rats. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:754–60.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren