- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT02096653
Fluoroscopically-guided Versus Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections
Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Comparative-effectiveness Study Comparing Fluoroscopically-guided and Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections
In this study, the investigators are attempting to determine whether intra- or extra-articular injections are more effective; the relative prevalence rate of intra-articular and extra-articular SI joint pain; and the accuracy of extra-articular injections using fluoroscopy as the reference standard. 124 consecutive patients with mechanical low back pain below L5, tenderness overlying the SI joint(s) and at least 3 positive provocative maneuvers will be randomized to receive SI joint injections by 2 different approaches.
Group 1 will receive fluoroscopically-guided injections into the joint. Group 2 will receive landmark-guided injections into the tender area around the joint. In order to determine whether the injection in group 2 was intra-articular or extra-articular, an x-ray will be done after the injection to ascertain the location of contrast spread. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief at 1-month. Patients who obtain benefit at 1-month will be followed at 3-months, while those who fail to obtain benefit will exit the study to receive alternative care.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, Forente stater
- Naval Hospital-San Diego
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Forente stater, 21205
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
Rockville, Maryland, Forente stater, 20889
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Hershey, Pennsylvania, Forente stater, 17033
- Penn State
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18;
- Low back pain principally below the L5 vertebra;
- Three out of 6 positive SI joint provocative maneuvers;
- Agreed to undergo SI joint injection for diagnostic/ therapeutic purposes;
- Average pain score > 3/10 over the past week;
- Pain duration > 6 weeks;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous SI joint injection;
- Leg pain > back pain or lower leg pain > upper leg pain
- Active inflammatory spondyloarthropathy (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis);
- Untreated coagulopathy;
- Allergy to contrast dye or bupivacaine;
- Pain > 20 years in duration;
- Poorly controlled psychiatric (e.g. PTSD) or medical (congestive heart failure) condition
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Dobbelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: X-ray guided intra-articular injection
Injection of 40 mg depomethylprednisolone and 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine into the SI (sacroiliac joint) cavity under fluoroscopic guidance
|
Injection of steroid and local anesthetic into the joint cavity using fluoroscopic guidance
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Landmark-guided SI joint injection
Injection of 40 mg depomethylprednisolone and 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the point of maximal tenderness (3 ml)
|
Injection of steroid into the joint area based on palpation.
The injection may be inside the joint (intra-articular) or outside the joint in the ligaments (extra-articular)
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Average Back Pain at 1 Month Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
Tidsramme: 1 month from the start of treatment
|
This outcome measure compares the average back pain at baseline to the average back pain 1 month after the start of treatment.
This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale.
The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10.
0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible.
The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
|
1 month from the start of treatment
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Utfall relatert til funksjonshemming målt etter 1 måned ved bruk av Oswestry Disability Index
Tidsramme: 1 måned etter behandlingsstart
|
Funksjonskapasitet målt ved hjelp av Oswestry funksjonshemmingsindeks.
Utvalget av mulige skårer for Oswestry Disability Index er 0-100.
0 er likestilt med ingen funksjonshemming og 100 er maksimal funksjonshemming som er mulig.
|
1 måned etter behandlingsstart
|
|
Utfall relatert til funksjonshemming målt etter 3 måneder ved bruk av Oswestry Disability Index
Tidsramme: 3 måneder etter behandlingsstart
|
Funksjonskapasitet målt ved hjelp av Oswestry funksjonshemmingsindeks.
Utvalget av mulige skårer for Oswestry Disability Index er 0-100.
0 er likestilt med ingen funksjonshemming og 100 er maksimal funksjonshemming som er mulig.
|
3 måneder etter behandlingsstart
|
|
Worst Back Pain at 1 Month Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
Tidsramme: 1 month from the start of treatment
|
This outcome measure compares the worst back pain at baseline to the worst back pain at 1 months after the start of treatment.
This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale.
The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10.
0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible.
The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
|
1 month from the start of treatment
|
|
Average Back Pain at 3 Months Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
Tidsramme: 3 months from the start of treatment
|
This outcome measure compares the average back pain at baseline to the average back pain at 3 months after the start of treatment.
This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale.
The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10.
0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible.
The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
|
3 months from the start of treatment
|
|
Worst Back Pain at 3 Months Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
Tidsramme: 3 months after the start of treatment
|
This outcome measure compares the worst back pain at baseline to the worst back pain at 3 months after the start of treatment.
This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale.
The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10.
0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible.
The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
|
3 months after the start of treatment
|
|
Patient satisfaction of the procedure at 1 month measured using the Likert Scale
Tidsramme: 1 month
|
Patient satisfaction is measured at 1 month after the procedure using the Likert Scale.
The range of possible scores for the Likert Scale are 1-5.
I being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied.
|
1 month
|
|
Patient satisfaction of the procedure at 3 months measured using the Likert Scale
Tidsramme: 3 months
|
Patient satisfaction is measured at 1 month after the procedure using the Likert Scale.
The range of possible scores for the Likert Scale are 1-5.
I being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied.
|
3 months
|
|
Positive categorical outcome
Tidsramme: 1 month
|
Decrease in average back pain score at 1 month of greater or equal to 2 points coupled with a satisfaction score > 3 on a 1-5 scale
|
1 month
|
|
Positive categorical outcome
Tidsramme: 3 months
|
Decrease in average back pain score at 3 months of greater or equal to 2 points coupled with a satisfaction score > 3 on a 1-5 scale
|
3 months
|
|
Positive diagnostic blocks
Tidsramme: 6 hours
|
The percentage of participants who experience greater or equal to 50% pain relief based on their pain diary
|
6 hours
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013 Jan;13(1):99-116. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.148.
- Cohen SP, Bicket MC, Kurihara C, Griffith SR, Fowler IM, Jacobs MB, Liu R, Anderson White M, Verdun AJ, Hari SB, Fisher RL, Pasquina PF, Vorobeychik Y. Fluoroscopically Guided vs Landmark-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Randomized Controlled Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):628-642. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.038. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- NA_00092414
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .