此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Fluoroscopically-guided Versus Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections

2018年2月5日 更新者：Johns Hopkins University

Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Comparative-effectiveness Study Comparing Fluoroscopically-guided and Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections

In this study, the investigators are attempting to determine whether intra- or extra-articular injections are more effective; the relative prevalence rate of intra-articular and extra-articular SI joint pain; and the accuracy of extra-articular injections using fluoroscopy as the reference standard. 124 consecutive patients with mechanical low back pain below L5, tenderness overlying the SI joint(s) and at least 3 positive provocative maneuvers will be randomized to receive SI joint injections by 2 different approaches.

Group 1 will receive fluoroscopically-guided injections into the joint. Group 2 will receive landmark-guided injections into the tender area around the joint. In order to determine whether the injection in group 2 was intra-articular or extra-articular, an x-ray will be done after the injection to ascertain the location of contrast spread. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief at 1-month. Patients who obtain benefit at 1-month will be followed at 3-months, while those who fail to obtain benefit will exit the study to receive alternative care.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

125

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

  • 美国
    • California
      • San Diego、California、美国
        • Naval Hospital-San Diego
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore、Maryland、美国、21205
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
      • Rockville、Maryland、美国、20889
        • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey、Pennsylvania、美国、17033
        • Penn State

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 100年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18;
  2. Low back pain principally below the L5 vertebra;
  3. Three out of 6 positive SI joint provocative maneuvers;
  4. Agreed to undergo SI joint injection for diagnostic/ therapeutic purposes;
  5. Average pain score > 3/10 over the past week;
  6. Pain duration > 6 weeks;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous SI joint injection;
  2. Leg pain > back pain or lower leg pain > upper leg pain
  3. Active inflammatory spondyloarthropathy (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis);
  4. Untreated coagulopathy;
  5. Allergy to contrast dye or bupivacaine;
  6. Pain > 20 years in duration;
  7. Poorly controlled psychiatric (e.g. PTSD) or medical (congestive heart failure) condition

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：治疗
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：X-ray guided intra-articular injection
Injection of 40 mg depomethylprednisolone and 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine into the SI (sacroiliac joint) cavity under fluoroscopic guidance
程序：X-ray SI joint steroid injection
Injection of steroid and local anesthetic into the joint cavity using fluoroscopic guidance
有源比较器：Landmark-guided SI joint injection
Injection of 40 mg depomethylprednisolone and 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the point of maximal tenderness (3 ml)
程序：Landmark-guided SI steroid injection
Injection of steroid into the joint area based on palpation. The injection may be inside the joint (intra-articular) or outside the joint in the ligaments (extra-articular)

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Average Back Pain at 1 Month Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
大体时间：1 month from the start of treatment
This outcome measure compares the average back pain at baseline to the average back pain 1 month after the start of treatment. This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale. The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10. 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible. The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
1 month from the start of treatment

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
使用 Oswestry 残疾指数在 1 个月时测量的与残疾相关的结果
大体时间：治疗开始后1个月
使用 Oswestry 残疾指数测量的功能能力。 Oswestry 残疾指数的可能分数范围是 0-100。 0 等于没有残疾，100 是可能的最大残疾。
治疗开始后1个月
使用 Oswestry 残疾指数在 3 个月时测量的与残疾相关的结果
大体时间：治疗开始后 3 个月
使用 Oswestry 残疾指数测量的功能能力。 Oswestry 残疾指数的可能分数范围是 0-100。 0 等于没有残疾，100 是可能的最大残疾。
治疗开始后 3 个月
Worst Back Pain at 1 Month Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
大体时间：1 month from the start of treatment
This outcome measure compares the worst back pain at baseline to the worst back pain at 1 months after the start of treatment. This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale. The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10. 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible. The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
1 month from the start of treatment
Average Back Pain at 3 Months Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
大体时间：3 months from the start of treatment
This outcome measure compares the average back pain at baseline to the average back pain at 3 months after the start of treatment. This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale. The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10. 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible. The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
3 months from the start of treatment
Worst Back Pain at 3 Months Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
大体时间：3 months after the start of treatment
This outcome measure compares the worst back pain at baseline to the worst back pain at 3 months after the start of treatment. This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale. The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10. 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible. The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
3 months after the start of treatment
Patient satisfaction of the procedure at 1 month measured using the Likert Scale
大体时间：1 month
Patient satisfaction is measured at 1 month after the procedure using the Likert Scale. The range of possible scores for the Likert Scale are 1-5. I being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied.
1 month
Patient satisfaction of the procedure at 3 months measured using the Likert Scale
大体时间：3 months
Patient satisfaction is measured at 1 month after the procedure using the Likert Scale. The range of possible scores for the Likert Scale are 1-5. I being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied.
3 months
Positive categorical outcome
大体时间：1 month
Decrease in average back pain score at 1 month of greater or equal to 2 points coupled with a satisfaction score > 3 on a 1-5 scale
1 month
Positive categorical outcome
大体时间：3 months
Decrease in average back pain score at 3 months of greater or equal to 2 points coupled with a satisfaction score > 3 on a 1-5 scale
3 months
Positive diagnostic blocks
大体时间：6 hours
The percentage of participants who experience greater or equal to 50% pain relief based on their pain diary
6 hours

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Johns Hopkins University

合作者

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2014年5月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2017年11月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2017年11月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年3月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年3月25日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年3月26日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年2月7日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年2月5日

最后验证

2018年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • NA_00092414

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

搜索类似试验

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

CROs by country

CROs in Costa Rica

条件

罕见疾病

药物干预

膳食补充剂

赞助者/合作者

地点

3
订阅