Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Study of the Efficacy of 4 Treatments for Fecal Incontinence in Community-dwelling Women

8. januar 2018 oppdatert av: Lluís Mundet, Hospital de Mataró

Study of the Efficacy of Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Community-dwelling Women: Assessment of Individual Efficacy on Anorectal Physiology and Cortical Plasticity, Its Impact on Clinical Severity and on Quality of Life.

This is a RCT aimed to assessing efficacy of kegel exercises,biofeedback, electrostimulation and transcutaneous neuromodulation on women with fecal incontinence, measuring its impact on anorectal physiology, cortical plasticity, clmical severity and the quality of life.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

Fecal incontinence is a prevalent condition with a major impact on quality of life. Currently four treatments are being used in clinical practice: Kegel exercises (K), biofeedback (BF), electrostimulation (ES) and transcutaneous neuromodulation (NM). Results in the literature are discordant and lack methodological rigour making scientific evidence weak.

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of these four treatments on community-dwelling women and their impact on anorectal physiology, on clinical severity and on QoL.

This is a randomized control trial. Patient physiology was studied with anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography; clinical severity was assessed with Cleveland and St. Mark's scales, and QoL with the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) and the EuroQol's EQ5D questionnaires. Urinary incontinence (UI) was also evaluated by means of International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ) score. Patients were randomized and assigned to K (control), BF+K, ES+K or NM+K, given active treatment for a 3-month period, and then evaluated again with identical tests and parameters to identify changes.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

150

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Hunn

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age higher than 18
  • To be woman
  • Have had incontinence episiodes at least from 6 month since the beginning of the study
  • Have had incontinence episodes during the last month prior the beginning of the study
  • The patient is able to understand the nature and impliations of the study and, therefore, to decide her participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting inclusion criteria
  • Have very mild condition (Wexner <4)
  • To be unable to perform / understand the treatments properly
  • Being pregnant
  • To have used treatmets for fecal incontinence within the last six months prior to the start of the study
  • If, at reserarcher's criteria, the patient has not the proper conditions to perform and finish the treatments.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Kegel exercises
Pelvic floor exercises designed in the 1950s' by Arnold Kegel.
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects. The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
Eksperimentell: biofeedback
Biofeeback therapy to improve neuromuscular coordination and strengthen sphincter contractility.
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects. The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
Eksperimentell: electrostimulation
Administration of electric current with a specific device (stimulator) and through a vaginal prove, in order to improve pelvic floor contractility.
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects. The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
Eksperimentell: transcutaneous neuromodulation
Stimulation of tibial nerve with a specific electric current through a stimulator and surface electrodes
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects. The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
clinical severity
Tidsramme: Changes of severity after 3 month-treatment
severity of the symptoms measured with Cleveland score
Changes of severity after 3 month-treatment
maximum anal resting pressure
Tidsramme: Changes maximum anal resting pressure after 3 month-treatment
pressure of the anal canal measured with mmHg
Changes maximum anal resting pressure after 3 month-treatment
maximum squeeze pressure
Tidsramme: Changes maximum squeeze pressure after 3 month-treatment
pressure on the anal canal when squeezing measured with mmHg
Changes maximum squeeze pressure after 3 month-treatment
rectal sensitivity
Tidsramme: changes in rectal balloon filling after 3 month-treatment
patient's rectal perception, measured with cm3 of distention of a rectal balloon
changes in rectal balloon filling after 3 month-treatment

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. februar 2013

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. desember 2016

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. mars 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

29. november 2017

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

8. januar 2018

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

9. januar 2018

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

9. januar 2018

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

8. januar 2018

Sist bekreftet

1. januar 2018

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere