Study of the Efficacy of 4 Treatments for Fecal Incontinence in Community-dwelling Women
8 de enero de 2018 actualizado por: Lluís Mundet, Hospital de Mataró
Study of the Efficacy of Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Community-dwelling Women: Assessment of Individual Efficacy on Anorectal Physiology and Cortical Plasticity, Its Impact on Clinical Severity and on Quality of Life.
This is a RCT aimed to assessing efficacy of kegel exercises,biofeedback, electrostimulation and transcutaneous neuromodulation on women with fecal incontinence, measuring its impact on anorectal physiology, cortical plasticity, clmical severity and the quality of life.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Fecal incontinence is a prevalent condition with a major impact on quality of life. Currently four treatments are being used in clinical practice: Kegel exercises (K), biofeedback (BF), electrostimulation (ES) and transcutaneous neuromodulation (NM). Results in the literature are discordant and lack methodological rigour making scientific evidence weak.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of these four treatments on community-dwelling women and their impact on anorectal physiology, on clinical severity and on QoL.
This is a randomized control trial. Patient physiology was studied with anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography; clinical severity was assessed with Cleveland and St. Mark's scales, and QoL with the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) and the EuroQol's EQ5D questionnaires. Urinary incontinence (UI) was also evaluated by means of International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ) score. Patients were randomized and assigned to K (control), BF+K, ES+K or NM+K, given active treatment for a 3-month period, and then evaluated again with identical tests and parameters to identify changes.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
150
Fase
- No aplica
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Femenino
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age higher than 18
- To be woman
- Have had incontinence episiodes at least from 6 month since the beginning of the study
- Have had incontinence episodes during the last month prior the beginning of the study
- The patient is able to understand the nature and impliations of the study and, therefore, to decide her participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not meeting inclusion criteria
- Have very mild condition (Wexner <4)
- To be unable to perform / understand the treatments properly
- Being pregnant
- To have used treatmets for fecal incontinence within the last six months prior to the start of the study
- If, at reserarcher's criteria, the patient has not the proper conditions to perform and finish the treatments.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Kegel exercises
Pelvic floor exercises designed in the 1950s' by Arnold Kegel.
|
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects.
The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
|
|
Experimental: biofeedback
Biofeeback therapy to improve neuromuscular coordination and strengthen sphincter contractility.
|
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects.
The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
|
|
Experimental: electrostimulation
Administration of electric current with a specific device (stimulator) and through a vaginal prove, in order to improve pelvic floor contractility.
|
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects.
The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
|
|
Experimental: transcutaneous neuromodulation
Stimulation of tibial nerve with a specific electric current through a stimulator and surface electrodes
|
The aim is to compare how each treatment improves symptoms and quality of life and which physiologic mechanisms affects.
The basal treatment which other therapies are compared to is Kegel.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
clinical severity
Periodo de tiempo: Changes of severity after 3 month-treatment
|
severity of the symptoms measured with Cleveland score
|
Changes of severity after 3 month-treatment
|
|
maximum anal resting pressure
Periodo de tiempo: Changes maximum anal resting pressure after 3 month-treatment
|
pressure of the anal canal measured with mmHg
|
Changes maximum anal resting pressure after 3 month-treatment
|
|
maximum squeeze pressure
Periodo de tiempo: Changes maximum squeeze pressure after 3 month-treatment
|
pressure on the anal canal when squeezing measured with mmHg
|
Changes maximum squeeze pressure after 3 month-treatment
|
|
rectal sensitivity
Periodo de tiempo: changes in rectal balloon filling after 3 month-treatment
|
patient's rectal perception, measured with cm3 of distention of a rectal balloon
|
changes in rectal balloon filling after 3 month-treatment
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
1 de febrero de 2013
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de diciembre de 2016
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
1 de marzo de 2017
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
29 de noviembre de 2017
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
8 de enero de 2018
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
9 de enero de 2018
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
9 de enero de 2018
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
8 de enero de 2018
Última verificación
1 de enero de 2018
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- IF02-11/2012
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .