Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Verktøyet "Let's Talk Tech" for å støtte beslutningstaking om teknologibruk

21. september 2026 oppdatert av: Clara Berridge, University of Washington

Mekanistisk studie av "Let's Talk Tech" dyadisk atferdsinngrep for å støtte beslutninger om teknologibruk

The goal of this research is to educate people about different technologies to support care at home when someone is experiencing memory difficulties. "Let's Talk Tech" is a new tool to educate people about technologies commonly used to support care and monitor safety, and help families talk about their feelings about them to understand each other's perspectives. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if "Let's Talk Tech" helps people feel more prepared to make decisions about technologies.

Researchers will compare Let's Talk Tech to usual care (no intervention) to see if Let's Talk Tech increases peoples' preparedness and confidence to make decisions about technologies.

All participants will:

  • Use the Let's Talk Tech web application together with their study partner that takes up to an hour or do nothing.
  • Complete two surveys. The second survey will be taken within 2 weeks of the first.

One participant in each pair will also take a 3rd short survey 3 months after the first.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

The goal of this research is to help families understand digital health technology options to support dementia care at home so they can negotiate immediate decisions and future use in an informed way. This is a mechanism-focused trial of Let's Talk Tech (LTT), a single-use, self-administered intervention in the form of a web application. It targets education and interpersonal communication processes to enable informed decision making and planning for technology use that relieves care partners of the burden of making decisions without awareness of the person's preferences. Participants are people living with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (PLWD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a care partner. The 120 enrolled dyads (60 per study group) will be randomly assigned to receive either the intervention or usual care control. The intervention is self-administered. All participants will complete measures at baseline and at post-test (2 weeks), and care partners will also complete them 3 months later. Aim 1 will test if LTT compared with usual care improves the hypothesized mechanisms of change that are care partners' technology awareness, understanding, communication satisfaction, and intention to honor the PLWD/MCI's preferences, as well as both care partner- and PLWD/MCI-reported dyadic alignment. Aim 2 will examine if and how those hypothesized mechanisms of change improve the post-test and 3-month primary outcomes of care partner preparedness, decisional conflict, and decision making confidence, and secondary outcomes of PLWD/MCI and care partner sharing of technology preferences beyond the dyad and their confidence that PLWD/MCI's preferences will be honored. Exploratory Aim 3 will examine how, with whom, and for what purpose dyad members share technology preferences and explore factors that vary for those who shared with providers vs. family/friends, with the hope of learning how to expand the reach of this intervention to activate dyads' entire care networks.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

222

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Forente stater, 98105
        • University of Washington

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria for Patients:

  • have mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia
  • age 55 or older
  • able to understand and speak English

Inclusion Criteria for Co-participants:

  • be identified by the patient as their primary support person
  • age 18 or older
  • able to understand and speak English
  • able to complete LTT together with their study partner at the same time

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Let's Talk Tech intervention

The intervention group will complete the single use self-administered Let's Talk Tech intervention together as a dyad.

Let's Talk Tech is a self-administered dyadic education and communication tool delivered as a web application to support shared decision making about technology use.

Ingen inngripen: Usual care

This control group will receive usual care, which means they will complete no intervention.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Preparedness to make technology decisions
Tidsramme: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

This is one of the three primary outcomes that are not mechanisms of change variables. Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Strongly agree" to 5="Strongly disagree"] how much they agree with the statement that they feel prepared to make decisions about technology use for their study partner.

baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Decisional Conflict Scale
Tidsramme: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

This is one of the three primary outcomes that are not mechanisms of change variables. The Decisional Conflict Scale is a 16-item scale with 5 response categories [0= "Strongly agree" to 4="Strongly disagree"]. Higher scores reflect higher decisional conflict in decision making.

baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Decision Making Confidence Scale (adapted)
Tidsramme: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

This is one of the three primary outcomes that are not mechanisms of change variables. This is a six-item scale with 5 response categories [0="Not confident at all" to 4= "Very confident"]. Higher scores reflect higher confidence in decision making.

baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Technology awareness
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very aware" to 5="Very unaware"] how aware they are about technologies available to support their partner's care and safety.

baseline and 2-week post-test
Technology understanding
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

4 items assess perceived understanding of each of 4 technologies featured in the intervention [1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"].

baseline and 2-week post-test
Perception of PLWD/MCI's technology understanding
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

4 items assess care partner's perception of how well their study partner understands of each of 4 technologies featured in the intervention [1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"].

baseline and 2-week post-test
Satisfaction with dyadic communication about technology
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very satisfied" to 5="Very dissatisfied"] how satisfied they are with their discussion with their study partner about using technology to support their care or safety.

baseline and 2-week post-test
Intention to honor preferences
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very likely" to 5="Very unlikely"] how likely they are to honor their partner's preferences for how technology is used in their care.

baseline and 2-week post-test
Dyadic alignment about technology use
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

Participant is asked how much they agree with their partner about using technologies to support their care [1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"].

baseline and 2-week post-test
Had conversation about technology
Tidsramme: baseline and 2-week post-test

Participant answers yes, no or unsure if they've ever had a conversation with their study partner about technology to support care or safety.

baseline and 2-week post-test

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Shared technology preferences
Tidsramme: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

Participant answer yes or no if they have ever shared the PLWD/MCI's preferences about technologies to support their care with anyone else.

baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Confidence preferences will be honored
Tidsramme: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1=Strongly agree to 5=Strongly disagree] about their belief the PLWD/MCI's choices about these technologies will be honored.

baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Satisfaction with involvement of primary participant in technology use decisions
Tidsramme: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very satisfied" to 5="Very dissatisfied"] how satisfied they are with how involved the primary participant is in decisions about technology to support their care.

baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Clara Berridge, PhD, University of Washington

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

7. februar 2025

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

25. august 2026

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

25. august 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

3. januar 2025

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

7. februar 2025

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

10. februar 2025

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

25. september 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

21. september 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. august 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere