Which Components of a Smartphone Walking App Help Users to Reach Personalized Step Goals? Results From an Optimization Trial

Jan-Niklas Kramer, Florian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Shawna N Smith, David Kotz, Urte Scholz, Elgar Fleisch, Tobias Kowatsch, Jan-Niklas Kramer, Florian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Shawna N Smith, David Kotz, Urte Scholz, Elgar Fleisch, Tobias Kowatsch

Abstract

Background: The Assistant to Lift your Level of activitY (Ally) app is a smartphone application that combines financial incentives with chatbot-guided interventions to encourage users to reach personalized daily step goals.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of incentives, weekly planning, and daily self-monitoring prompts that were used as intervention components as part of the Ally app.

Methods: We conducted an 8 week optimization trial with n = 274 insurees of a health insurance company in Switzerland. At baseline, participants were randomized to different incentive conditions (cash incentives vs. charity incentives vs. no incentives). Over the course of the study, participants were randomized weekly to different planning conditions (action planning vs. coping planning vs. no planning) and daily to receiving or not receiving a self-monitoring prompt. Primary outcome was the achievement of personalized daily step goals.

Results: Study participants were more active and healthier than the general Swiss population. Daily cash incentives increased step-goal achievement by 8.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): [2.1, 14.1] and, only in the no-incentive control group, action planning increased step-goal achievement by 5.8%, 95% CI: [1.2, 10.4]. Charity incentives, self-monitoring prompts, and coping planning did not affect physical activity. Engagement with planning interventions and self-monitoring prompts was low and 30% of participants stopped using the app over the course of the study.

Conclusions: Daily cash incentives increased physical activity in the short term. Planning interventions and self-monitoring prompts require revision before they can be included in future versions of the app. Selection effects and engagement can be important challenges for physical-activity apps.

Clinical trial information: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03384550.

Keywords: Engagement; Intervention components; Microrandomized trials; Mobile health; Walking.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The Ally app: dashboard with daily overview (left), weekly overview (middle), and chat interactions with the Ally chatbot (right).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Participant flow.

References

    1. Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, et al. . Leisure time physical activity and mortality: A detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:959–967.
    1. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Murtagh EM, Holder RL. The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. Prev Med. 2007;44:377–385.
    1. Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to health. Sports Med. 1997;23:306–332.
    1. Kvedar JC, Fogel AL, Elenko E, Zohar D. Digital medicine’s march on chronic disease. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:239–246.
    1. Direito A, Carraça E, Rawstorn J, Whittaker R, Maddison R. mHealth technologies to influence physical activity and sedentary behaviors: Behavior change techniques, systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Behav Med. 2016;51:226–239.
    1. Romeo A, Edney S, Plotnikoff R, et al. . Can smartphone apps increase physical activity? systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e12053.
    1. Collins LM, Trail JB, Kugler KC, Baker TB, Piper ME, Mermelstein RJ. Evaluating individual intervention components: Making decisions based on the results of a factorial screening experiment. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4:238–251.
    1. Klasnja P, Hekler EB, Shiffman S, et al. . Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychol. 2015;34S:1220–1228.
    1. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A. How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: The health action process approach. Eur Psychol. 2008;13:141–151.
    1. Carroll JK, Moorhead A, Bond R, LeBlanc WG, Petrella RJ, Fiscella K. Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e125.
    1. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982;92:111–135.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28:690–701.
    1. Bélanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Amireault S. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7:23–54.
    1. Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane JM. Objective user engagement with mental health apps: Systematic search and panel-based usage analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e14567.
    1. Madison K, Schmidt H, Volpp KG. Smoking, obesity, health insurance, and health incentives in the Affordable Care Act. JAMA. 2013;310:143–144.
    1. Mitchell MS, Orstad SL, Biswas A, et al. . Financial incentives for physical activity in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis [published online ahead of print May 15, 2019]. Br J Sports Med. 2019. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100633.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM.. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum, 1985.
    1. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:627–668; discussion 692.
    1. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.
    1. Kramer JN, Künzler F, Mishra V, et al. . Investigating intervention components and exploring states of receptivity for a smartphone app to promote physical activity: Protocol of a microrandomized trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8:e11540.
    1. Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER. Computers are social actors. Presented at: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 24–28, 1994. Boston, MA; 1994.
    1. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357:757–762.
    1. Flückiger C, Del Re AC, Wampold BE, Horvath AO. The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018;55:316–340.
    1. Adams MA, Hurley JC, Todd M, et al. . Adaptive goal setting and financial incentives: A 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial to increase adults’ physical activity. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:286.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, Kang M. Revisiting “how many steps are enough?”. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:S537–S543.
    1. Filler A, Kowatsch T, Haug S, et al. . MobileCoach: A novel open source platform for the design of evidence-based, scalable and low-cost behavioral health interventions—Overview and preliminary evaluation in the public health context. Presented at: 14th Annual Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS 2015), April 15–17 2015; New York, NY. New York, NY: IEEE; 2015: 1–6.
    1. Statcounter GlobalStats. Mobile Operating System Market Share in Switzerland, February 2019. Available at . Accessibility verified March 21, 2019.
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. . The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.
    1. Hekler EB, Buman MP, Grieco L, et al. . Validation of physical activity tracking via android smartphones compared to actigraph accelerometer: Laboratory-based and free-living validation studies. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e36.
    1. Duncan MJ, Wunderlich K, Zhao Y, Faulkner G. Walk this way: Validity evidence of iphone health application step count in laboratory and free-living conditions. J Sports Sci. 2018;36:1695–1704.
    1. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:191–196.
    1. Boruvka A, Almirall D, Witkiewitz K, Murphy SA. Assessing time-varying causal effect moderation in mobile health. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113:1112–1121.
    1. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:1049–1060.
    1. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
    1. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
    1. Althoff T, Sosič R, Hicks JL, King AC, Delp SL, Leskovec J. Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature. 2017;547:336–339.
    1. Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M.. SF-36 Fragebogen Zum Gesundheitszustand: Deutsche Version des Short Form-36 Health Survey. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2011.
    1. Finkelstein EA, Haaland BA, Bilger M, et al. . Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:983–995.
    1. Harkins KA, Kullgren JT, Bellamy SL, Karlawish J, Glanz K. A trial of financial and social incentives to increase older adults’ walking. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52:e123–e130.
    1. Promberger M, Marteau TM. When do financial incentives reduce intrinsic motivation? Comparing behaviors studied in psychological and economic literatures. Health Psychol. 2013;32:950–957.
    1. Shcherbina A, Hershman SG, Lazzeroni L, et al. . The effect of digital physical activity interventions on daily step count: A randomised controlled crossover substudy of the MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1:e344–e352.
    1. Künzler F, Kramer J-N, Kowatsch T. Efficacy of mobile context-aware notification management systems: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Presented at: Fifth International Workshop on Pervasive and Context-Aware Middleware (PerCAM’17); October 9. Rome, Italy; 2017.
    1. Dorsey ER, Yvonne Chan YF, McConnell MV, Shaw SY, Trister AD, Friend SH. The use of smartphones for health research. Acad Med. 2017;92:157–160.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere