Can a Smartphone App That Includes a Chatbot-based Coaching and Incentives Increase Physical Activity in Healthy Adults?

March 24, 2018 updated by: University of St.Gallen

Investigating Different Intervention Components of a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity: The ALLY Micro-Randomized Trial

The investigators conduct a micro-randomized trial to test main effects and moderators of three different intervention components of Ally, a mHealth intervention to promote physical activity that is offered to customers of a large Swiss health insurance. Interventions include the use of different incentive strategies, a weekly planning intervention and daily message prompts to support self-regulation. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) as well as principles from behavioral economics were used to guide the development of interventions. Further, sensor data is collected in order to enable prediction of latent contextual variables. These data can be used to build prediction models for the user's state of receptivity, i.e. points in time where the user is able and/or willing to receive, process and utilize the support provided. The results of this study enable the evidence-based development of a just-in-time adaptive intervention for physical activity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) have recently been proposed as framework for health interventions that exploit the potential of mobile health information and sensing technologies. By obtaining contextual information for example from smartphone sensors (e.g. location, time of day), a JITAI adapts the provision of interventions over time with the goal to deliver support when the person needs it most (state of vulnerability) and is most likely to be receptive (state of receptivity).

To facilitate the development of a JITAI for physical activity, the present study has the following objectives:

  1. To quantify main effects and interactions of three intervention components of Ally, a mHealth intervention for physical activity.
  2. To identify moderators for these intervention components to formulate evidence-based decision rules.
  3. To train machine learning models that predict the user's state of receptivity

A micro-randomized trial design is used to meet the objectives of the study. Customers of a large Swiss health insurance company will use Ally over a 10-day baseline and a 6-week study period. During the baseline period, participants only have access to the dashboard of the app and no interventions are administered. During the intervention period, Ally provides daily personalized step goals and different interventions via an interactive chatbot interface based on the MobileCoach system (www.mobile-coach.eu). We investigate the following intervention components as between-subject or within-subject experimental factors during the intervention period: daily self-regulation coaching (two levels, within-subjects), a weekly planning intervention (3 levels, within-subjects) and different incentive strategies (3 levels, between-subjects).

Primary outcome will be the difference in achievement of the daily personalized step goal between intervention and control conditions for all intervention components. We expect all intervention components to increase the probability of goal achievement. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted for per protocol analysis and adjustment for covariates. Moderators of intervention components will be investigated exploratively.

To reach objective 3, we will collect a wide range of smartphone sensor data as well as usage logs of the Ally app throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

274

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint Gallen, Switzerland, 9000
        • Center for Digital Health Interventions

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Possession of iPhone (5s or newer) or Android smartphone (Android 4.0 or higher)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not enrolled in a complementary health insurance plan
  • actively using an activity tracker or comparable smartphone app
  • working night shifts
  • presence of medical condition(s) that prohibit increased levels of physical activity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control

Participants in this arm receive no incentives.

As all participants, participants in this arm receive self-regulation coaching on 50% of the days during the intervention period. For each participant, days during the intervention period are randomly allocated to a coaching or a no coaching condition using an allocation ratio of 1:1.

As all participants, participants in this arm also receive either an action planning, a coping planning or no planning condition each Sunday during the intervention period. Participants are randomized to one out of nine sequences of planning interventions according to a uniform and strongly balanced intervention schedule

Short (2-5 min.) dialogue with the digital coach who provides information relevant for behavioral self-regulation, such as a goal reminder, the distance between the current step count and the goal and strategies to increase daily steps. Participants are randomized to self-regulation coaching or control (no coaching) on a daily basis.
A dialogue with the digital coach who prompts the participant to either formulate action plans (when and where the participant can go for a walk) or coping plans (strategies to respond to barriers for increasing daily steps) for the upcoming week. Participants are randomized on a weekly basis to action planning, coping planning or control (no planning).
Experimental: Financial Incentives

Participants in this arm receive financial incentives.

As all participants, participants in this arm receive self-regulation coaching on 50% of the days during the intervention period. For each participant, days during the intervention period are randomly allocated to a coaching or a no coaching condition using an allocation ratio of 1:1.

As all participants, participants in this arm also receive either an action planning, a coping planning or no planning condition each Sunday during the intervention period. Participants are randomized to one out of nine sequences of planning interventions according to a uniform and strongly balanced intervention schedule

Short (2-5 min.) dialogue with the digital coach who provides information relevant for behavioral self-regulation, such as a goal reminder, the distance between the current step count and the goal and strategies to increase daily steps. Participants are randomized to self-regulation coaching or control (no coaching) on a daily basis.
A dialogue with the digital coach who prompts the participant to either formulate action plans (when and where the participant can go for a walk) or coping plans (strategies to respond to barriers for increasing daily steps) for the upcoming week. Participants are randomized on a weekly basis to action planning, coping planning or control (no planning).
Participants receive CHF 1 ($1) for each day they meet a personalized adaptive step goal.
Experimental: Charity Incentives

Participants in this receive charity incentives.

As all participants, participants in this arm receive self-regulation coaching on 50% of the days during the intervention period. For each participant, days during the intervention period are randomly allocated to a coaching or a no coaching condition using an allocation ratio of 1:1.

As all participants, participants in this arm also receive either an action planning, a coping planning or no planning condition each Sunday during the intervention period. Participants are randomized to one out of nine sequences of planning interventions according to a uniform and strongly balanced intervention schedule

Short (2-5 min.) dialogue with the digital coach who provides information relevant for behavioral self-regulation, such as a goal reminder, the distance between the current step count and the goal and strategies to increase daily steps. Participants are randomized to self-regulation coaching or control (no coaching) on a daily basis.
A dialogue with the digital coach who prompts the participant to either formulate action plans (when and where the participant can go for a walk) or coping plans (strategies to respond to barriers for increasing daily steps) for the upcoming week. Participants are randomized on a weekly basis to action planning, coping planning or control (no planning).
Participants donate CHF 1 ($1) to a charity of choice for each day they meet a personalized adaptive step goal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily goal achievement
Time Frame: seven weeks
Goal achievement will be assessed daily by comparing participants daily step count to the respective individualized step goal
seven weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Steps per day
Time Frame: seven weeks
Steps will be measured daily via the GoogleFit or Apple Health application using the smartphone's built-in accelerometer
seven weeks
Behavioral regulation in physical activity
Time Frame: seven weeks

Behavioral regulation in physical activity will be measured using the second version of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). The BREQ-2 consists of five subscales which represent different forms of regulation along the extrinisc-intrinsic continuum of motivation. Because the external regulation subscale in the BREQ-2 exclusively relates to external regulation by other people, it is substituted by the corresponding sub-scale of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Scores will be reported for each subscale separately. Answers are given on a five-point likert scale with the endpoints 0-not true for me and 4-very true for me.

Scores range from 0 to 16 for the subscales amotivation, external regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic regulation and from 0-12 for the subscale introjected regulation with higher scores representing a stronger manifestation of the respective form of regulation.

seven weeks
Engagement
Time Frame: seven weeks
App engagement is measured using the number and length of app launch sessions per day. An app launch session is defined as any interaction of the user with the Ally app, separated by five minutes between events. If a user left the app open and did not take action for 5 minutes or more, then the next interaction with the app counts as a new session.
seven weeks
Non-usage attrition
Time Frame: seven weeks
Non-usage attrition is measured using the proportion of users that have stopped using the app for at least 7 days (i.e. there are >7 days between their last session and the end of the study,
seven weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tobias Kowatsch, PhD, University of St.Gallen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 001-Ally

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected data will be irreversibly anonymized and made available in a public non-profit data repository. Data that can potentially identify participants will be deleted (e.g. e-mail addresses) or altered in a way that prevents identification (e.g. global positioning system (GPS) data will be converted to abstract features, such as "at home/not at home"). Consent to publish anonymized data is obtained from all participants.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of all analyses and publication of the main results of the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Self-regulation coaching

Subscribe