Phase III Trial Adding Vincristine-Topotecan-Cyclophosphamide to the Initial Treatment of Patients With Nonmetastatic Ewing Sarcoma: A Children's Oncology Group Report

Abstract

Purpose: The primary aim of this phase III randomized trial was to test whether the addition of vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide (VTC) to interval compressed chemotherapy improved survival outcomes for patients with previously untreated nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard five-drug interval compressed chemotherapy (regimen A) for 17 cycles or experimental therapy with five cycles of VTC within the 17 cycles (regimen B). Patients were stratified by age at diagnosis (< 18 years and ≥18 years) and tumor site (pelvic bone, nonpelvic bone, and extraosseous). Tumor volume at diagnosis was categorized as < 200 mL or ≥ 200 mL. Local control occurred following six cycles. Histologic response was categorized as no viable or any viable tumor. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between randomized groups with stratified log-rank tests.

Results: Of 642 enrolled patients, 309 eligible patients received standard and 320 received experimental therapy. The 5-year EFS and OS were 78% and 87%, respectively. There was no difference in survival outcomes between randomized groups (5-year EFS regimen A v regimen B, 78% v 79%; P = .192; 5-year OS 86% v 88%; P = .159). Age and primary site did not affect the risk of an EFS event. However, age ≥ 18 years was associated with an increased risk of death at 5 years (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.96; P = .009). The 5-year EFS rates for patients with pelvic, nonpelvic bone, and extraosseous primary tumors were 75%, 78%, and 85%, respectively. Tumor volume ≥ 200 mL was significantly associated with lower EFS.

Conclusion: While VTC added to five-drug interval compressed chemotherapy did not improve survival, these outcomes represent the best survival estimates to date for patients with previously untreated nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01231906.

Conflict of interest statement

Patrick J. LeaveyResearch Funding: Eleison Pharmaceuticals Nadia N. LaackResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squib Mark D. KrailoConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & DohmeTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme R. Lor RandallHonoraria: Daiichi Sankyo, Onkos Surgical, OncliveTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Biomet, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly Steven G. DuBoisResearch Funding: Merck (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Curis (Inst), Loxo (Inst), BMS (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Turning Point Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Salarius Pharmaceuticals (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Salarius PharmaceuticalsUncompensated Relationships: Y-mAbs Therapeutics Inc Damon R. ReedConsulting or Advisory Role: Eisai, PfizerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Salarius Pharmaceuticals Douglas S. HawkinsResearch Funding: Loxo (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Pfizer (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer, AstraZeneca Helen NadelConsulting or Advisory Role: ICON Clinical Research G. Douglas LetsonEmployment: StrykerConsulting or Advisory Role: StrykerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Stryker Mark BernsteinResearch Funding: Merck Paul ChubaEmployment: Radiation Oncology Specialists Neyssa MarinaEmployment: Five Prime Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche (I), Synthorx, Sanofi PasteurStock and Other Ownership Interests: Five Prime Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche (I), Synthorx, Sanofi PasteurTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Five Prime Therapeutics, SynthorxUncompensated Relationships: Stanford University School of MedicineOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/1210881 Richard GorlickResearch Funding: Eisai Katherine A. JanewayHonoraria: Foundation MedicineConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, IpsenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Leo MascarenhasConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerResearch Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Bayer, Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Turning Point Therapeutics, Pfizer, Incyte, Amgen, E.R. Squibb Sons, LLC, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MerckTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer, Lilly, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Salarius PharmaceuticalsUncompensated Relationships: Children's Oncology Group Foundation, The Pablove Foundation, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/OncologyNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.

AEWS1031 CONSORT diagram. aRefusal of protocol therapy by patient, parent, or guardian. bPhysician considered administration of protocol therapy to not be in the patient's best interests. IE, ifosfamide and etoposide; VDC, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide; VTC, vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide.

FIG 2.

(A) EFS and (B) OS according to randomized treatment arm. Regimen A = VDC plus IE; regimen B = VTC plus VDC plus IE. EFS, event-free survival; IE, ifosfamide and etoposide; OS, overall survival; VDC, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide; VTC, vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide.

FIG 3.

(A) EFS and (B) OS according to age; (C) EFS and (D) OS by primary site. EFS, event-free survival; EO, extraosseous; Ot Bn, nonpelvic bone; OS, overall survival; P, pelvic bone.

FIG 4.

(A) EFS by tumor volume and (B) EFS by amount of viable tumor at time of local control surgery. EFS, event-free survival.