Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Treatment of Trauma-Related Anger in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans (TOTRA)

20 października 2021 zaktualizowane przez: VA Office of Research and Development
Excessive and poorly controlled anger is one of the most common problems experienced by war Veterans. The consequences can be severe, including increased risk for divorce, domestic violence, job loss and instability, and other serious impairments in family, social, and occupational functioning. Availability of effective treatments is critical to reducing the adverse effects of anger in Veterans. The investigators propose to conduct a controlled study to determine whether a cognitive behavior treatment that has been adapted for treating anger problems in Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan results in improved outcomes compared to a supportive therapy. Results will be examined for improvement in anger, functioning, and quality of life at end of 12 weekly sessions, and at 3 and 6 months following treatment.

Przegląd badań

Status

Zakończony

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

Poorly controlled anger is a common problem with often devastating effects in Veterans who have served in a warzone. Adverse consequences include increased risk for divorce, domestic violence, job loss and instability, and other serious impairments in family, social, and occupational functioning. Recent evidence indicates that anger and aggression are likely to be problems for a significant proportion of Veterans of Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom, OIF; Operation New Dawn, OND) and Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom, OEF). A survey of reintegration problems among 754 OEF/OIF combat Veterans receiving VA Medical care showed that anger was the most commonly reported problem, with 57% reporting increased problems in controlling anger. Despite encouraging evidence for efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions in treating anger in civilian samples, much less is known about the efficacy of such treatments for anger problems in military personnel following exposure to war zone trauma. Promising preliminary findings for individually based cognitive behavioral treatment have been reported, and there is evidence that a group anger management treatment delivered by teleconferencing is as effective as the same treatment delivered in person, but to date there is not a single adequately powered randomized trial designed to test the efficacy of an anger treatment compared to an active control condition in Veterans. Building on findings from the investigators' randomized pilot study, the objective of the current proposal is to conduct a randomized clinical trial with sufficient statistical power to test the effectiveness of a manualized cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) that has been adapted from an existing treatment (Anger Control Therapy; Novaco, 1994, 2001) for the treatment of anger problems in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans, compared to a manualized supportive therapy intervention (SI) control condition. Ninety OEF/OIF/OND Veterans reporting significant problems with anger will be randomized to receive 12 individual sessions of one of the two study conditions. Outcomes including measures of anger and aggression; interpersonal, social and occupational functioning; and quality of life will be assessed during and at the end of treatment and at 3 and 6 month follow-ups. Exploratory analyses will examine 1) whether a diagnosis of PTSD impacts treatment effectiveness and 2) potential mediators of treatment outcome with CBI.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

112

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

  • Stany Zjednoczone
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Stany Zjednoczone, 02908
        • Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

18 lat i starsze (Dorosły, Starszy dorosły)

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Wszystko

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female current or former member of the military (active duty, National Guard or Reserve) Deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan
  • Experience trauma during deployment
  • Clinically significant anger
  • At least 2 additional symptoms of PTSD hyperarousal
  • If on medication, no changes within prior 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current severe substance use disorder or prior severe substance use disorder not in remission for at least 3 months
  • Current psychotic symptoms
  • current Mania or Bipolar Disorder
  • Current suicidal or homicidal ideation requiring hospitalization
  • Any severe cognitive impairment or history of Organic Mental Disorder

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Leczenie
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Pojedynczy

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CBI)
12 weekly individual sessions consisting of psychoeducation, and cognitive and behavioral anger management strategies
Behawioralne: Cognitive Behavioral Intervention
Includes individual therapy sessions using cognitive and behavioral strategies addressing problems with anger intensity / frequency / management
Inne nazwy:
  • CBI
Aktywny komparator: Supportive Intervention (SI)
12 weekly individual sessions consisting of psychoeducation, problem-solving strategies, and support
Behawioralne: Supportive Intervention
Includes individual therapy sessions using supportive and problem-solving strategies.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Least Squares Mean Anger Expression Index Score on the State Trait Anger Inventory 2 (STAXI-2) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12, 3 and 6 months post-treatment
The STAXI-2 is a revision of Spielberger's State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), expanded from 44 to 57 items. It is a self-report questionnaire consisting of six scales and an Anger Expression Index (AX). Scales include State Anger, Trait Anger, Anger Expression-Out, Anger Expression-In, Anger Control-Out and Anger Expression-In. The Anger Expression Index is an overall measure of the expression and control of anger based on responses to the two anger expression and the two anger control subscales. Minimum and Maximum Values range from 0 to 96, higher scores mean more anger.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12, 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Least Squares Mean Aggression Scale Score on the Overt Aggression Scale-Modified (OAS-M) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12 (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Structured Interview that assesses verbal and physical aggressive behaviors. Minimum and Maximum Values range from 0 to no maximum, higher scores mean more anger.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12 (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Least Squares Mean Global Social Adjustment Score on the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, 12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Psychosocial functioning scales from the clinician administered Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) provides assessment of functioning in areas of work (employment, household, or student), various aspects of interpersonal functioning, recreation and satisfaction. The global social adjustment score is based upon a 5 point scale. Ratings are based on the past month. The psychosocial functioning ratings have been found to be of generally high reliability. Minimum and Maximum Values range from 1 to 5, higher scores mean worse functioning.
Baseline, 12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Least Squares Mean Global Work Functioning Score on the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, 12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Psychosocial functioning scales from the clinician administered Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) provides assessment of functioning in areas of work (employment, household, or student), various aspects of interpersonal functioning, recreation, satisfaction and global social adjustment. Ratings are based on the past month. The psychosocial functioning ratings have been found to be of generally high reliability. Minimum and Maximum Values for the work functioning global score range from 1 to 5, higher scores mean worse functioning.
Baseline, 12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Least Squares Mean Total Score on the Outcomes Questionnaire (OQ) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-treatment
The OQ is a self report measure that assesses functioning and includes three subscales: symptom distress, interpersonal relations, and social role functioning. Concurrent validity has been demonstrated in relation to internal consistency and reliability. Additionally, the OQ has been shown to be fairly stable in untreated individuals and sensitive to change in those individuals in treatment. Minimum and Maximum Values range from 0 to 180, higher scores mean worse functioning.
Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Least Squares Mean Psychological Domain Score on the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, 12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), is 26 item self-report measure used to assess quality of life in multiple domains (i.e., physical, psychological, social, and environment). Psychometric properties suggest that the measure is valid and reliable across cultures and nations. Ratings are made on a 5 point scale. The psychological subscale, which consists of 6 items, was used in this study. Minimum and Maximum Values for the psychological domain range from 6 to 30, higher scores mean better quality of life.
Baseline, 12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
Least Squares Mean PTSD Severity Score on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for DSM-5 Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline,12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment
The CAPS-5 (updated for DSM-5) is a clinician administered structured interview for the assessment of DSM-5 PTSD. The CAPS has excellent reliability and validity and is widely used in PTSD treatment research. Each one of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms is rated on a 0-4 (low to high) scale to determine symptom severity. The cutoff used to establish the presence of an individual symptom is a score of 2 or greater. Overall PTSD severity is computed by summing the totals for all items. Minimum and Maximum Values range from 0 to 80, higher scores mean higher levels of symptomatology.
Baseline,12 weeks (end of treatment), 3 and 6 months post-treatment

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Least Squares Mean Total Score on the Anger Consequences Questionnaire (ACQ) Using a Repeated Measures ANCOVA Adjusted for Baseline Scores and Time Effects
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Week 12, 3 and 6 months Post-treatment
The ACQ is a brief self-report measure developed to assess the frequency of negative anger-related behavioral consequences. Internal consistencies of .75 to .91 have been reported. This scale includes items not covered by the other anger measures, including for example, trouble with the law, driving recklessly, getting into an accident, damaging relationships, etc. There are 50 items; minimum and maximum Values range from 0 to 200. Higher scores means more anger.
Baseline, Week 12, 3 and 6 months Post-treatment

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Tracie M. Shea, PhD, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 stycznia 2015

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

28 lutego 2019

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

28 lutego 2019

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

6 maja 2014

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

3 czerwca 2014

Pierwszy wysłany (Oszacować)

6 czerwca 2014

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

18 listopada 2021

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

20 października 2021

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 października 2021

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Słowa kluczowe

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • D1146-R
  • Rx 001146 (Inny numer grantu/finansowania: VA RR&D)

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

TAk

Opis planu IPD

I anticipate sharing the data, but have not yet developed a specific plan.

Ramy czasowe udostępniania IPD

April 1 2021

Typ informacji pomocniczych dotyczących udostępniania IPD

  • Protokół badania
  • Plan analizy statystycznej (SAP)
  • Raport z badania klinicznego (CSR)

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

produkt wyprodukowany i wyeksportowany z USA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Badania kliniczne na Cognitive Behavioral Intervention

Wyszukaj podobne próby

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

CROs by country

CROs in Thailand

Warunki

Rzadkie choroby

Interwencje lekowe

Suplementy diety

Sponsor / Współpracownicy

Lokalizacje

Subskrybuj