A Pilot Study of Hepatic Irradiation with Yttrium-90 Microspheres Followed by Immunotherapy with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

David R Minor, Kevin B Kim, Ricky T Tong, Max C Wu, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, Marlana Orloff, David J Eschelman, Carlin F Gonsalves, Robert D Adamo, Pramila R Anne, Jason J Luke, Devron Char, Takami Sato, David R Minor, Kevin B Kim, Ricky T Tong, Max C Wu, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, Marlana Orloff, David J Eschelman, Carlin F Gonsalves, Robert D Adamo, Pramila R Anne, Jason J Luke, Devron Char, Takami Sato

Abstract

Background: Liver metastases from uveal melanoma carry a very poor prognosis. Hepatic artery infusions with Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres have some activity in this disease, and radiation and immunotherapy may be synergistic. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability of sequential 90Y resin microspheres and immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients with uveal melanoma with hepatic metastases were entered into a pilot study. Treatment consisted of two infusions of 90Y resin microspheres, one to each lobe of the liver, followed in 2-4 weeks by immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab every 3 weeks for four doses, then maintenance immunotherapy with nivolumab alone. Results: Initial dosing of both 90Y and immunotherapy resulted in excessive toxicity. With decreasing the dosage of 90Y to limit the normal liver dose to 35Gy and lowering the ipilimumab dose to 1 mg/kg, the toxicity was tolerable, with no apparent change in efficacy. There was one complete and four confirmed partial responses, for an objective response rate of 20% and a disease control rate of 68%. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-9.7 months), with a median overall survival of 15 months (95% CI: 9.7-20.1 months). Conclusions: With dose reductions, sequential therapy with 90Y and immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab is safe and tolerable, and has activity in metastatic uveal melanoma. These results justify a controlled trial to demonstrate whether 90Y resin microspheres add to the utility of combination immunotherapy in this disease. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02913417.

Keywords: Yttrium-90; hepatic metastases; ipilimumab; nivolumab; uveal melanoma.

Conflict of interest statement

D.J.E. receives research funding from Phillips. M.K.-S. is a consultant to Array and hold patents #8,492,102 for molecular diagnosis of melanoma and #10,526,662 for FALZ as a target for cancer therapy. J.J.L. is on Scientific Advisory Boards: (no stock) 7 Hills, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio (stock) Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Kanaph, Mavu, Onc.AI, Pyxis, TempestConsultant: Abbvie, Alnylam, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Checkmate, Crown, Cstone, Eisai, EMD Serono, Flame, Genentech, Gilead, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Immunocore, Immutep, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Ribon, Rubius, Silicon, Synlogic, Synthekine, TRex, Werewolf, Xencor. Research Support: AbbVie, Agios (IIT), Array (IIT), Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb (IIT & industry), Corvus, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Numab, Replimmune, Rubius, Spring bank, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, Xenco. Patents: Serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy), PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof). TS is on the advisory boards of Immunocore and Castle Biosciences. D.R.M., K.B.B., R.T.T., M.C.W., M.O., C.F.G., R.D.A., P.R.A., and D.C. have no interests to disclose.

References

    1. Singh AD, Topham A. Incidence of uveal melanoma in the United States: 1973–1997. Ophthalmology 2003;110:956.
    1. Lorigan JG, Wallace S, Mavligit GM. The prevalence and location of metastases from ocular melanoma: Imaging study in 110 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:1279.
    1. Lane AM, Kim IK, Gragoudas ES. Survival rates in patients after treatment for metastases from uveal melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:981.
    1. Rantala ES, Hernberg M, Kivela T. Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Res 2019;29:561.
    1. Van Raamsdonk CD, Griewank KG, Crosby MB, et al. . Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2191.
    1. Carvajal R, Sosman JA, Quevedo JF, et al. . Effect of selumetinib versus chemotherapy on progression-free survival in uveal melanoma: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;311:2397.
    1. Luke J, Callahan MK, Postow MA, et al. : Clinical activity of ipilimumab for metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancer 2013;119:3687.
    1. Algazi AP, Tsai KT, Shoushtari AN, et al. . Clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies. Cancer 2016;122:3344.
    1. Sato. T, Eschelman DJ, Gonsalves CF, et al. Immunoembolization of malignant liver tumors, including uveal melanoma, using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Clin Onc 2008;26:5429.
    1. Gonsalves CE, Eschelman DJ, Adamo RD, et al. . A prospective phase II trial of radioembolization for treatment of uveal melanoma hepatic metastasis. Radiology 2019;293:223.
    1. Victor CT, Reich AJ, Maity A, et al. . Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer. Nature 2015;520:373–377.
    1. Demaria S, Ng B, Devitt ML, et al. . Ionizing radiation inhibition of distant untreated tumors (abscopal effect) is immune mediated. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:862.
    1. Hoos A, Wolchok JD, Humphrey RW, et al. . Immune-related response criteria—Capturing clinical activity in immuno-oncology. Can Clin Res 2015;21:4989.
    1. Sirtex Medical, Inc., Sir-Spheres package insert, 2014. Available at (accessed December 30, 2021).
    1. Khoja L, Atenafu EG, Suciu S, et al. . Meta-analysis in metastatic uveal melanoma to determine progression free and overall survival benchmarks: An interaational rare cancers initiative (IRCI) ocular melanoma study. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1370.
    1. Piulats JM, Espinosa E, Cruz L, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for treatment-naïve metastatic uveal melanoma: An open-label, multicenter, Phase II trial by the Spanish multidisciplinary melanoma group (GEM-1402). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:586.
    1. Pelster MS, Gruschkus SK, Bassett R, et al. . Nivolumab and ipilimumab in metastatic uveal melanoma: Results from a single-arm phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:599.
    1. Plachouris D, Mountris KA, Papadimitroulas P, et al. . Clinical evaluation of a three-dimensional internal dosimetry technique for liver radioembolization with 90Y microspheres using dose voxel kernels. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;36:809–819.
    1. Mountris KA, Bert J, Noailly J, et al. . Modeling the impact of prostate edema onLDR brachytherapy: A Monte Carlo dosimetry study based on 3D biphasic finite element biomechanical model. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:2087.
    1. Piperno-Neuman S, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, et al. . Phase 3 randomized trial comparing Tebentafusep with investigator's choice in first line metastatic uveal melanoma. AACR Annual Meet Virt 2021;81:CT002.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj