Inter-rater Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in a Swedish Emergency Department Setting
Frailty is a common clinical syndrome in older adults, which may be assessed through various assessment tools. One frequently used tool is the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) which potentially can be adopted for daily use in the Emergency Department and has been appraised for reliability to some extent, but have so far not been evaluated in the Swedish emergency care context.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in a clinical Swedish Emergency Department (ED) setting. Members of multidisciplinary emergency care teams will conduct the assessments individually.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
The CFS is introduced and tested as part of a quality-improvement process regarding elderly people within the Emergency departments (EDs) of Region Östergötland (Östergötland County) in Sweden.
CFS is a 9-point scale developed within the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. It comprises of a pictograms and a clinical description to help assign scores ranging from very fit to terminally ill. CFS enables clinicians to rapidly stratify the degree of frailty in the elderly with the help of questions and clinical assessment. However, since the assessment is judgement based, it is important that the inter-rater reliability is satisfactory.
This study is part of a larger project where all eligible patients who visit the ED (24/7) for a period of four weeks will be enrolled and then subsequently assessed with CFS by one of their responsible health-care professionals (i.e. physician, registered nurse or nurse assistant). For this study, each professional on the team will individually assess each patient. First, a clinical judgement is performed (frail/not frail) without any instrument, and then the patient is assessed by using the CFS. This will take place during work shifts when someone from the research team is present and can arrange the assessments, as well as ensure that they are conducted independently. These work shifts will be selected using the online application Research Randomizer, to randomly include all hours of the day as well as eligible health-care professionals.
The research-team member will collect the assigned CFS-scores and information on the age, gender, profession, position (emergency physician or intern/resident from other specialities) and the number of years in the profession of each assessor. Informed consent will be obtained from all health-care professionals who participate. No data that can identify any patient will be collected.
Sample size is determined to be 100 patients, which would be more than sufficient with a power of 90% and α 0,05.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Östergötland
-
Linköping, Östergötland, Suécia, 58185
- Akutmottagningen US Östergötland
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Health care professionals:
Physicians, nurses and assistant nurses who are the responsible healthcare professionals for the enrolled patients
Patients:
Patients of all genders at the age of ≥65 years seeking medical care at the three ED instances in Region Östergötland.
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
Health-care professionals:
- Working in the ED, as part of the emergency-care team that are responsible for a patient ≥65 years
Patients:
- ≥65 years
Exclusion Criteria:
Health care professionals:
- Unwilling to provide informed consent
Patients:
- ≤65 years
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of inter-rater reliability regarding frailty as assessed by CFS
Prazo: The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED
|
Inter-rater reliability of the CFS, expressed as Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
|
The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of correlation between degree of frailty (CFS 1-9) and degree of inter-rater reliability
Prazo: The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED
|
Investigates whether inter-rater reliability, expressed as Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, varies between scale scores in CFS.
Described descriptively.
|
The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED
|
|
Agreement between CFS and clinical judgement (frail/not frail)
Prazo: The clinical judgement is made just before the assessment with CFS
|
Investigates the agreement between a clinical judgement (with no frailty tool) regarding the patient being frail or not, compared to frailty according to the CFS (cut-off 5).
Expressed as a percentage.
|
The clinical judgement is made just before the assessment with CFS
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in measures for Inter-rater reliability, expressed as Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, between care teams with emergency physicians in relation to care teams with interns/residents from other specialties.
Prazo: The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED
|
An Emergency department in Sweden typically has physicians from other specialities who work for a period of time.
They may not have the same education and training in CFS assessments, we want to explore if the results differ in terms of inter-rater reliability between care teams with emergency physicians and care teams with other physicians.
|
The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
- Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
- Hallgren KA. Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
- Lewis ET, Dent E, Alkhouri H, Kellett J, Williamson M, Asha S, Holdgate A, Mackenzie J, Winoto L, Fajardo-Pulido D, Ticehurst M, Hillman K, McCarthy S, Elcombe E, Rogers K, Cardona M. Which frailty scale for patients admitted via Emergency Department? A cohort study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jan-Feb;80:104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
- Manfredi G, Midao L, Paul C, Cena C, Duarte M, Costa E. Prevalence of frailty status among the European elderly population: Findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Aug;19(8):723-729. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13689. Epub 2019 May 30.
- Preston L, Chambers D, Campbell F, Cantrell A, Turner J, Goyder E. What evidence is there for the identification and management of frail older people in the emergency department? A systematic mapping review. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2018 Apr. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493681/
- Kaeppeli T, Rueegg M, Dreher-Hummel T, Brabrand M, Kabell-Nissen S, Carpenter CR, Bingisser R, Nickel CH. Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;76(3):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.028. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
- Lo AX, Heinemann AW, Gray E, Lindquist LA, Kocherginsky M, Post LA, Dresden SM. Inter-rater Reliability of Clinical Frailty Scores for Older Patients in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;28(1):110-113. doi: 10.1111/acem.13953. Epub 2020 Apr 2. No abstract available.
Links úteis
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2021-00875IRR
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .