Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Enxaqueca aceita acupuntura a laser comparada em exame de sangue de MMP2 e CGRP: um RCT cego único.

29 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Taichung Veterans General Hospital

A comparação da dor de cabeça primária no exame de sangue de MMP2 e CGRP: um estudo cego randomizado controlado por acupuntura com laser simulado.

Aims:

To investigate the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for the severity of primary headache and comorbidities, and the Lab data examination.

Methods:

In this hospital-based prospective single blind randomized sham-controlled study, patients over 18 years old with primary headache will be randomly divided into two treatment arms including laser-acupuncture and sham-controlled group. The expected laser-acupuncture protocol will be bilateral BL2, GB20, EX-HN5, GB8, LI4, LR3 and midline EX-HN3 in totally eight sessions at the first month. In the sham-laser-acupuncture group, patients will receive eight sessions of laser-acupuncture for free after unblinding. We expected to track patients for at least half year. The diagnosis and classification of headache was evaluated using the ICHD-3 criteria. The severity of headache was evaluated using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and headache diary provided by Taiwan Headache Society. The co-primary efficacy end points are change in migraine days per month and variation of MIDAS. The secondary end point is the reducing of the severity of comorbidities including headache related anxiety and depression, and both of the quality of life and sleep.

In addition, patients' characteristics will be investigated as follows:

  1. Sociodemographic factors (ethnicity, age, sex, body weight, BMI, blood pressure)
  2. Headache related parameters (onset, duration, pain scale, current medication for headache, menstrual cycle)
  3. Anxiety, evaluate by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  4. Depression, evaluate by Beck's Depression Inventory
  5. Quality of life, evaluate by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
  6. Quality of sleep, evaluate by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
  7. Aura of headache
  8. Episodic or chronic headache (If patient diagnosed as migraine.)
  9. Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia (If patient diagnosed as migraine.) During the following time, we will need the patient's blood samples four times, each times 20cc, all need 80cc for Lab test of MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin.

Importance:

In our hospital, we perform laser-acupuncture for patients with headache for several years. A prospective randomized controlled study is the key tools to establish the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for primary headache, and the Lab data with MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin for approval. Look forward to help improve therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Recrutamento

Descrição detalhada

Headache is one of the most common complaints encountered in medical institution as known as an almost universal human experience. Approximately 65% of headaches are classified as primary, which was a composite of migraine, tension-type headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia and other primary headaches according to the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). Primary headaches encompass a heterogeneous group of neurologic disorders and might be bothersome for patients.

It's well established that acupuncture can be considered a treatment option for migraine prevention. The efficacy of laser-acupuncture is similar to acupuncture, and laser-acupuncture is a non-invasive therapeutic approach and safety. It could reduce the risk of hemorrhage, infection and needle phobia. However, the efficacy of laser-acupuncture in primary headache remains inconclusive.

MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin are new Lab examination for following up the patients suffered from migraine.

Aims:

To investigate the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for the severity of primary headache and comorbidities, and the Lab data examination.

Methods:

In this hospital-based prospective single blind randomized sham-controlled study, patients over 18 years old with primary headache will be randomly divided into two treatment arms including laser-acupuncture and sham-controlled group. The expected laser-acupuncture protocol will be bilateral BL2, GB20, EX-HN5, GB8, LI4, LR3 and midline EX-HN3 in totally eight sessions at the first month. In the sham-laser-acupuncture group, patients will receive eight sessions of laser-acupuncture for free after unblinding. We expected to track patients for at least half year. The diagnosis and classification of headache was evaluated using the ICHD-3 criteria. The severity of headache was evaluated using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and headache diary provided by Taiwan Headache Society. The co-primary efficacy end points are change in migraine days per month and variation of MIDAS. The secondary end point is the reducing of the severity of comorbidities including headache related anxiety and depression, and both of the quality of life and sleep.

In addition, patients' characteristics will be investigated as follows:

  1. Sociodemographic factors (ethnicity, age, sex, body weight, BMI, blood pressure)
  2. Headache related parameters (onset, duration, pain scale, current medication for headache, menstrual cycle)
  3. Anxiety, evaluate by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  4. Depression, evaluate by Beck's Depression Inventory
  5. Quality of life, evaluate by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
  6. Quality of sleep, evaluate by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
  7. Aura of headache
  8. Episodic or chronic headache (If patient diagnosed as migraine.)
  9. Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia (If patient diagnosed as migraine.) During the following time, we will need the patient's blood samples four times, each times 20cc, all need 80cc for Lab test of MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin.

Importance:

In our hospital, we perform laser-acupuncture for patients with headache for several years. A prospective randomized controlled study is the key tools to establish the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for primary headache, and the Lab data with MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin for approval. Look forward to help improve therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

60

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • Taichang
      • Taichung, Taichang, Taiwan, 404
        • Recrutamento
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
        • Contato:
          • Yuan-Chen Liu
          • Número de telefone: 82641 886-4-2359-2525

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Migraine patient under the diagnosis and classification of headache was evaluated using the ICHD-3 criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years old
  • Pregnancy

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Triplo

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Laser treatment

CM patients with unsatisfactory pharmacological effects receive laser acupuncture for 8 sessions that spanned 4 weeks. Laser stimulation energy of 4.5 J for 30 seconds at each of the following acupoints: bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3)

Laser stimulation energy of 4.5 J for 30 seconds at each of the following acupoints: bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3)

Comparador Falso: Sham treatment

CM patients with unsatisfactory pharmacological effects receive sham treatment for 8 sessions that spanned 4 weeks. Sham treatment had no laser output.

Sham treatment with no laser output, stimulate the same acupoints as laser acupuncture group as follows: 30 seconds at bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3)

After 6 months followed up, the sham group received truely Laser stimulation energy of 4.5 J for 30 seconds at each of the following acupoints: bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3), and followed up for another 3 months.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
cGRP
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in cGRP from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
MMP2
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in MMP2 from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Difference in the number of headache days per month
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in monthly migraine days (MMD) from baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the of headache attacks lasting hours per month
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in acute headache medications usage days per month from baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the headache pain intensity (NRS)
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

changes in the headache severity (based on NRS) between baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the number of days with acute headache medication intake per month
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in acute headache medications usage days per month from baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the Migraine Disability Assessment
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

changes in the Migraine Disability Assessmen between baseline and each follow-up time point.

Title: Migraine Disability Assessmen Maximum value:450 Minimum value:0 Higher scores mean: worsen outcome

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the Beck's Depression Inventory
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in Beck's Depression Inventory between baseline and each follow-up time point

Title:Beck's Depression Inventory Maximum value:63 Minimum value:0 Higher scores mean: worsen outcome

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale between baseline and each follow-up time point

Title:Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Maximum value:21/21 Minimum value:0/0 Higher scores mean:worsen outcome

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
30% reduction in migraine days
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

≥ 30% reduction in migraine days between baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Substance P
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in Substance P from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
beta-endorphin
Prazo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in beta-endorphin from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Chi-Hsiang Chou, M.D., Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  • Diretor de estudo: Chi Sheng Wang, M.D., Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  • Diretor de estudo: Huan Yun Wu, M.D., Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

7 de abril de 2025

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de novembro de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de dezembro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

2 de setembro de 2024

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

2 de setembro de 2024

Primeira postagem (Real)

4 de setembro de 2024

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

30 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

29 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever