Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Refractory Focal Epilepsy (so-tDCS-RE)

29 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Shu-Juan Tian, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University

Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treating Refractory Focal Epilepsy

This pilot study evaluated whether a type of non-invasive brain stimulation called slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) can reduce seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Ten patients received 14 days of so-tDCS (2 mA, 1 Hz) for 20 minutes twice daily, guided by their individual seizure focus identified by EEG and MRI. Seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges were measured before, during, and up to 8 weeks after treatment. The study also assessed safety and tolerability. Results showed that so-tDCS significantly reduced seizure frequency, with the greatest effect occurring during the first week of treatment, and the benefit was sustained during follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported. These preliminary findings suggest that so-tDCS may be a safe and effective non-invasive option for refractory focal epilepsy, but larger sham-controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

tudy Design This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study conducted at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China. Ten patients with refractory focal epilepsy (ILAE 2017 criteria) were enrolled. All patients completed the full treatment and follow-up protocol.

Participants Inclusion criteria: age 6-60 years, focal epilepsy, failed ≥2 anti-seizure medications, stable medication for ≥4 weeks, ≥2 seizures during 4-week baseline. Exclusion criteria: psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, progressive neurological disease, implanted electronic devices, pregnancy/lactation.

Intervention Slow-oscillatory tDCS (so-tDCS) was delivered using a constant-current stimulator (Hypnos Tech, China). The cathode was placed over the neuroimaging-defined epileptogenic zone (using MRI, FDG-PET, MEG, and scalp EEG). The reference anode was placed at FP1 or FP2 (contralateral). Stimulation parameters: 1 Hz sinusoidal oscillatory current, 2 mA peak-to-peak, delivered for 20 minutes per session, twice daily, with a 20-minute interval between sessions, for 14 consecutive days (total 40 minutes/day). Each session included a 20-second linear ramp-up and ramp-down. Sponge electrodes (13.68 cm²) soaked in 0.9% saline were used.

Outcome Measures Primary outcome: Percentage change in seizure frequency during treatment (14 days) and follow-up (8 weeks) compared with baseline.

Secondary outcomes: Change in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) per hour on long-term EEG; change in alpha power (8-13 Hz) at Pz, CZ, P3, and C3 electrodes; safety and tolerability (adverse events); exploratory analysis of etiology (e.g., encephalomalacia vs. FCD) and treatment response.

Assessments Seizure diaries were kept daily. Long-term EEG (~16 hours) was recorded at baseline, post-treatment (week 2), and follow-up (week 10). Epileptiform discharges were quantified by two blinded electroencephalographers. EEG spectral analysis (FFT) was performed for theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands.

Statistical Analysis Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for seizure frequency changes. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for IEDs. For alpha power, Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction (12 electrode sites, α=0.00417) was applied. Effect sizes (Cliff's delta, Cohen's d) were calculated where appropriate. No imputation was made for missing data (none occurred).

Results Summary Seizure frequency significantly decreased during treatment (median reduction 95.65%, p=0.0020) and follow-up (median reduction 76.35%, p=0.0122). Six of ten patients achieved ≥78% reduction. IED frequency decreased significantly (p=0.0434). Alpha power increased significantly at Pz, CZ, and P3 (Bonferroni-corrected). The most pronounced seizure reduction occurred in the first week. No serious adverse events were reported; only mild transient skin itching/erythema in two adults, which resolved without treatment.

Limitations Small sample size, open-label design (no sham control), and heterogeneity in etiologies limit generalizability. The results are hypothesis-generating; sham-controlled randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy.

Conclusion This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that so-tDCS is safe, well-tolerated, and associated with seizure reduction in refractory focal epilepsy, with a rapid onset and sustained effect. Further studies with sham control and larger cohorts are warranted.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

10

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Hebei
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050000
        • The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion criteria were established as follows:(1)a confirmed diagnosis of focal-onset seizures, with or without focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic evolution, according to the ILAE 2017 classification; (2)a disease duration of at least 2 years; (3)pharmacoresistance, defined as failure of adequately tried, appropriately chosen, and well-tolerated trials of at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs); (4)a stable ASM regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline with agreement to maintain the same regimen throughout the study; (5)concurrent use of one to five ASMs; (6)at least two seizures during the 4-week baseline observation period.

Exclusion criteria included:(1) psychogenic nonepileptic seizures; (2) progressive neurological or systemic disorders other than epilepsy; (3) pregnancy or breastfeeding; (4) substance abuse; (5) the presence of implanted electrical medical devices.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: so-tDCS
Participants received 14 days of slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) over the neuroimaging-defined epileptogenic zone (cathode), with reference anode at FP1/FP2. Stimulation: 1 Hz, 2 mA, two 20-minute sessions per day (20-minute interval), for 14 consecutive days.
1 Hz sinusoidal oscillatory current, 2 mA peak-to-peak, delivered via sponge electrodes (13.68 cm²) soaked in 0.9% saline. Cathode placed over individual epileptogenic zone (defined by MRI, FDG-PET, MEG, and scalp EEG). Reference anode placed at FP1 or FP2 (contralateral). Each session: 20 minutes with 20-second ramp-up/ramp-down. Two sessions per day, separated by a 20-minute rest period, for 14 consecutive days.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in seizure frequency
Prazo: Baseline (4 weeks), during treatment (weeks 1-2), and follow-up (weeks 3-10)
Percentage change in weekly seizure frequency from baseline to the end of the 2-week treatment period, and to the end of the 8-week follow-up period.
Baseline (4 weeks), during treatment (weeks 1-2), and follow-up (weeks 3-10)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

13 de janeiro de 2024

Conclusão Primária (Real)

30 de abril de 2024

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

31 de outubro de 2024

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

29 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

29 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

6 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

6 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

29 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • so-tDCS-RE-2024
  • 2022YFC3600500 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: the National Key Research and Development Program of China)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Epilepsia Focal Refratária

3
Se inscrever