此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

A Comparison of Primary Care and Traditional Internal Medicine Residents

The goal of this study is to identify objective differences between primary care and traditional medicine residents in clinical performance, continuity of care and utilization of resources. Specifically, this retrospective study will analyze the database collected by CLIMACS, the computer system at Cornell Internal Medicine Associates (CIMA). This system is used for clinical and administrative purposes; it manages and tracks patient's information and demographics, appointment booking, clinical diagnosis, prescriptions and medications, laboratory and radiology test, and consults. In our study, we will analyze a subset of the CLIMACS database from previous years.

研究概览

详细说明

Three areas will be examined:

  1. Clinical performance
  2. Continuity of care
  3. Utilization of resources

Clinical performance will be assessed using Health Plan Employer data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance standards. These standards were developed for the purposes of quality assessment, and in our study we will examine the following HEDIS standards:

  1. Breast Cancer Screening- the proportion of women between the ages of 52 and 64 who have had a mammogram within a two year period.
  2. Cervical Cancer Screening- the proportion of women between the ages of 21 and 64 who had a Pap test in the preceding 3 years.
  3. Cholesterol Screening- the proportion of patients ages 20 to 39 and 40-59 who have had their cholesterol tested at least once in the past five years.
  4. Asthma admission rate- the proportion of asthmatics admitted to the hospital for the care of asthma per year.
  5. Diabetic Standards-

    1. Admission for cellulitis/ 1000 diabetics per year.
    2. Admission for diabetes/ 1000 diabetics per year.
    3. Inpatient days per 100 diabetics per year.
    4. Prevalence of ischemic heart disease.
    5. Prevalence of severe renal disease.
    6. Diabetics with >2 hemoglobin A1C drawn per year.

Continuity of Care will be assessed by 3 different indicators:

  1. The proportion of visits that are made to the designated primary care provider of the number of visits made.
  2. The proportion of missed appointments of the total number of appointments.
  3. The proportion of walk in visits of the total number of appointments.

Resource utilization will be assessed by examining the following:

  1. Number of lab test per year per patient.
  2. Number of specialty consults per year per patient.
  3. Hospital admission rates per patient per year.
  4. Cost to medications. Confidentiality will be maintained throughout the study. In clinical practice access to CLIMACS is limited to the medical providers and administrators by individuals access codes. Furthermore, our study will remove specific identifiers to maintain the anonymity of both the patients and residents.

研究类型

观察性的

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • New York
      • New York、New York、美国、10065
        • New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Medical College

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

21年 至 64年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are followed as outpatients by a Cornell affiliated internist at the Cornell Internal Medicine Associates (CIMA).
  2. Patients at New York Hospital who may or may not go on to be followed as outpatients at CIMA.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who elect not to participate in the study.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
To identify the differences between primary care and traditional medicine residents in clinical performance, continuity of care and utilization of resources.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

1995年1月1日

研究完成

2005年1月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2005年9月20日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2005年9月20日

首次发布 (估计)

2005年9月22日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2008年4月3日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2008年4月2日

最后验证

2008年3月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅