此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Impact of Extensive Consultation on Career Development Grant Outcomes

2018年10月9日 更新者:University of California, San Francisco

In this study we wish is to determine whether extensive (up to 15 hours) multidisciplinary consultation in biostatistics, study design, data management, ethics, and writing provided by the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute's (CTSI) Consultation Services program, improves peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation.

We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will improve peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation.

We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will lead to greater numbers of funded grants when compared to the usual levels of consultation.

研究概览

详细说明

CTSI Consultation Services is one of the largest programs within the UCSF CTSI. It was created to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical and translational research through the provision of expert consultation. The program is divided into units that provide access to expert consultants in biostatistics, research design (with consultants representing multiple distinct methodologies and disease interests), data management (including data structure and database design), ethics, and scientific writing. With funding from the NIH, the program is able to offer a free hour of consultation in each of its units (up to 4 hours) but charges for additional services to cover costs.

There have been no studies of research consultation services. Though the benefit may seem self evident, such programs are expensive and distract senior researcher from more creative work. Justifying research consultation is important given the multitude of activities vying for attention and funding. Observational studies of the impact of research consultation services will always be limited by confounding, particularly confounding by indication since those seeking such services may be more highly motivated and organized. Thus, a randomized trial is warranted.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

132

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • California
      • San Francisco、California、美国、94144
        • University of California, San Francisco

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Applying for a Career Development grant from the NIH.
  • Anticipated submission date is 3 or more months in the future
  • Resident, fellow, or junior faculty member at UCSF or a CTSI-affiliated institution.
  • Recognized potential benefit from additional consultation

    • Additional areas that could be improved as judged by the subject and the initial consultant
    • Adequate time to provide consultation before submission date

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:1-Extensive Consultations
Intervention- Receives extensive consulting services
receives 15 free hours of multidisciplinary consultations towards the preparation of their career development grant.
其他名称:
  • Consultations
  • Extensive Multi-disciplinary Consultations
无干预:2-Regular levels of service
Control - Receives regular levels of service; one hour free services from each of the 4 units, with option to pay for more.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
大体时间
NIH priority score of the reviewed proposal, with unsubmitted or unscored proposals counted as priority scores that are right-censored at 300 (old system) or 50 (new system)
大体时间:30 Months
30 Months

次要结果测量

结果测量
大体时间
Percentage of subjects who obtain funding for the submitted proposal
大体时间:30 Months
30 Months
Institute-specific percentile of the priority score
大体时间:30 Months
30 Months
Percentage of subjects who submit proposals for funding
大体时间:30 Months
30 Months
Percentage of subjects who received a good score (<40 or <200) which may be associated with future funding of a resubmission
大体时间:30 Months
30 Months
Percentage of subjects who obtained any career development award funding
大体时间:30 Months
30 Months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Alka Kanaya, MD、University of California, San Francisco
  • 研究主任:Peter Bacchetti, PhD、University of California, San Francisco
  • 研究主任:Clay Johnston, MD, PhD、University of California, San Francisco

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2008年4月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2018年7月30日

研究完成 (实际的)

2018年7月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2008年4月17日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2008年4月18日

首次发布 (估计)

2008年4月21日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年10月11日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年10月9日

最后验证

2018年10月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅