Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Weakness of pelvic floor support is the cause defects and damage to pelvic organs functioning and urinary control and it has a pretty common occurrence. It was suggested recently that the event is considered a hernia that requires mesh use, which reduces return rates following pelvic floor repair. Mesh use is known to cause complications and unwanted side effects, such as chronic pain, vaginal network exposure and infection. The degree of complications is related directly to the mass of the mesh, and that's why the absorbable meshes were developed.Two months after the surgery with absorbable mesh, the mass left in the patient's body is half of the initial mesh mass and according to our assumption this effect will minimize the extent and intensity of mesh complications compared with conventional ones.
During the study we will examine medical records of women who have had surgery with pelvic floor reconstructive meshes. The cases will be divided according to the mesh type being used.
A polypropylene mesh (single strand and tunneling wide) trade name "Prolift", and similar mesh that contains approximately half of the network mass after being dissolves in two months, a trade name "Prolift +" M.
The number of participants in each group is 120 women. The post-operative follow-up examination will include three points in time. After a month, six months and a year later. In addition to questionnaires in order to quantify the degree of urinary disturbance, pain after surgery and sexual function.
研究类型
注册 (预期的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Nahariya、以色列、22100
- 招聘中
- Western Galilee Hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women who had pelvic floor repair surgery wit mesh used to the posterior vaginal wall.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women with significant pre-operative pain
- Women with collagen diseases
- Women who underwent pelvic floor repair surgery with mesh to the anterior vaginal wall
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 观测模型:病例对照
- 时间观点:横截面
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:M Neuman, MD
- 首席研究员:Menahem Neuman
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (预期的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 20 (Sophies Minde Ortopedi AS)
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.