Intranasal Peptide T in the Treatment of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy of AIDS

June 23, 2005 updated by: Advanced Peptides
To compare the effects of intranasal peptide T and placebo in the treatment of painful peripheral neuropathy associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Univ of Miami School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia Presbyterian Med Ctr
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • Saint Luke's - Roosevelt Hosp Ctr
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Med Ctr / Klingenstein Clinical Ctr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Patients must have:

  • Documented HIV-1 infection.
  • CD4 count < 500 cells/mm3.
  • HIV-1-associated distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, with peripheral neuropathy present for at least 6 weeks prior to study entry.
  • Pain severity of at least 8 on an analog scale.
  • Prior zidovudine therapy for at least the previous 3 months (unless patient has shown intolerance to zidovudine).

Exclusion Criteria

Co-existing Condition:

Patients with the following symptoms and conditions are excluded:

  • Neuropathy due to any other cause besides HIV infection.
  • Any symptom consistent with a new or active underlying opportunistic infection or malignancy that could interfere with the evaluation of neuropathy.
  • Clinical evidence of new or active CNS disease, potentially from opportunistic infection or neoplasm resulting from HIV infections, that could interfere with the evaluation of neuropathy.
  • Other CNS disease (e.g., myelopathy) that could complicate the evaluation of neuropathy.
  • Active life-threatening illness other than AIDS.

Concurrent Medication:

Excluded:

  • Dapsone.
  • Hydralazine.
  • Isoniazid (INH).
  • Current use of tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or clonidine unless the patient has used the drug without a change in dose for at least 3 months prior to study entry.
  • Narcotics, unless the patient has been using them for at least 6 weeks prior to study entry.

Prior Medication:

Excluded:

  • ddI or ddC in the past 8 weeks.
  • Prior peptide T.
  • Prior tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or clonidine unless they have been used for at least 3 months without change in dose.
  • Other investigational drugs within the past 30 days.

Required:

  • Zidovudine (if intolerance not demonstrated).

Required:

  • Zidovudine for at least the previous 3 months (unless patient has demonstrated intolerance to zidovudine).

Chronic alcohol abuse, or current abuse of psychoactive recreational drugs as defined in DSM IIIR. Patients who may be regarded as unreliable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Advanced Peptides

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • MacFadden DK, Doob PR. Role of peptide T in palliation of HIV-1-related painful peripheral neuropathy. Int Conf AIDS. 1991 Jun 16-21;7(2):225 (abstract no WB2173)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 2, 1999

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2001

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 31, 2001

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 24, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2005

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 1993

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 115A
  • 01 (Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings