Models of Disordered Knowledge and Memory Systems in Dementia and Related Disorders

March 3, 2008 updated by: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) perform poorly on tasks dependent on access to, and utilization of, previously acquired knowledge and skills. It has been commonly assumed that impaired knowledge in AD, as well as in other patients with cortical lesions, is due to an actual loss or disorganization of a specific knowledge base or system. This hypothesis has, however, recently been called into question by data from tasks that purport to tap knowledge on a more automatic and implicit level. For example, although AD patients are impaired on object naming and verbal fluency tasks, they show a normal pattern of semantic facilitation on reaction time based priming tasks. In fact, the level of facilitation or activation on these tasks has often been reported to be greater in AD patients than in normal individuals. These and similar data have been used to support arguments that performance decrements in AD patients are due to deficits in attentional and/or retrieval processes rather than a degradation of knowledge stores. The central focus of this project will be to test a model of the semantic representations of object that predicts increased facilitation or hyperpriming in AD patients as a result of degraded representations. The relationship between performance on on-line priming tasks, visual attention and spatial processes, and explicit and implicit measures of memory also will be examined. In addition to normal controls, patients with cognitive and memory impairments, but without semantically-based naming difficulties (elderly depressed, Huntington's disease, Korsakoff's disease) will serve as controls for overall slowness of response and degree of explicit memory deficit.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) perform poorly on tasks dependent on access to, and utilization of, previously acquired knowledge and skills. It has been commonly assumed that impaired knowledge in AD, as well as in other patients with cortical lesions, is due to an actual loss or disorganization of a specific knowledge base or system. This hypothesis has, however, recently been called into question by data from tasks that purport to tap knowledge on a more automatic and implicit level. For example, although AD patients are impaired on object naming and verbal fluency tasks, they show a normal pattern of semantic facilitation on reaction time based priming tasks. In fact, the level of facilitation or activation on these tasks has often been reported to be greater in AD patients than in normal individuals. These and similar data have been used to support arguments that performance decrements in AD patients are due to deficits in attentional and/or retrieval processes rather than a degradation of knowledge stores. The central focus of this project will be to test a model of the semantic representations of object that predicts increased facilitation or hyperpriming in AD patients as a result of degraded representations. The relationship between performance on on-line priming tasks, visual attention and spatial processes, and explicit and implicit measures of memory also will be examined. In addition to normal controls, patients with cognitive and memory impairments, but without semantically-based naming difficulties (elderly depressed, Huntington's disease, Korsakoff's disease) will serve as controls for overall slowness of response and degree of explicit memory deficit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
650

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Subjects will include:

Patients assigned a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease meeting NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-III-R criteria.

Patients with other neuropsychiatric illness (i.e., depression, Korsakoff's disease, Huntington's disease).

Normal controls.

Subjects must not have major concomitant illness.

All patients will be drug-free for at least 2 weeks whenever possible. Concurrent use of some medications (i.e., diuretics or antibiotics) will be allowed only after careful review by the investigators.

Normal control subjects will be without a history of or present psychiatric or neurological illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 1992

Study Completion

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2000

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 8, 2000

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2002

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 10, 2002

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 4, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2008

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 1999

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 920075
  • 92-M-0075

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings