Inactivated Influenza A/H9N2 Vaccine With and Without MF59 Adjuvant in Ambulatory Adults

August 26, 2010 updated by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Evaluation of the Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of Four Dosage Levels of Intramuscular Monovalent Inactivated Influenza A/H9N2 Vaccine With and Without MF59 Adjuvant in Ambulatory Adults

The purpose of this study is to compare the body's reactions and immune responses after receiving different strengths of a H9N2 influenza virus vaccine with and without an adjuvant given into the arm muscle. Study participants will include up to 96 healthy adults, ages 18-34. The 4 dosages of the experimental H9N2 vaccine to be tested in this study are the following: 3.75, 7.5, 15, and 30-mcg (with and without MF59 adjuvant). Participants will be vaccinated on Days 0 and 28. Participants will record any vaccine side effects in a diary for 7 days following each vaccination. Participants will return to the clinic on days 2 and 7 after vaccination. Blood samples will be collected 7 days following each vaccination. Serum and nasal wash specimens will be collected before each vaccination and 4 weeks after injections (0, 4, and 8 weeks). Participants will be involved in study related procedures for up to 8 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary goal of this study is to assess the safety of 4 different dosages of purified monovalent surface antigen (SA) influenza A/H9N2 virus vaccine with or without MF59 adjuvant and administered intramuscularly to ambulatory adults. The hypothesis is that all dosage levels of adjuvanted and nonadjuvanted vaccine will be well tolerated. The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the safety of 4 dosage levels of monovalent surface antigen (SA) influenza A/H9N2 virus vaccine given with or without MF59 adjuvant. The primary endpoint is the frequency and severity of solicited local and systemic adverse events in each vaccine dosage level group. The secondary objective of this project is to determine the immunogenicity of 4 dosage levels of monovalent surface antigen (SA) influenza A/H9N2 virus vaccine given with or without MF59 adjuvant. The secondary endpoints include the following: the proportions of subjects in each vaccine dosage group that achieve a serum HAI titer of at least 1:32 one month after the second vaccination; the geometric mean titer (GMT) of serum HAI antibody against the influenza A/H9N2 virus one month after the second vaccination; the rates of significant increases in titer between pre- and post-immunization serum samples (defined as seroconversion-i.e., increase in titer from <1:4 pre-immunization to at least 1:8 after vaccination, or 4-fold or greater increase in titer between pre- and post-immunization samples) 28 days after each vaccination (days 28 and 56); and the proportion of subjects with a 4-fold or greater increase in percent HA-specific antibody in nasal wash specimens for each vaccine group. The study will be a double-blind evaluation of 4 dosage levels of study vaccine. The 4 dosage levels to be tested are 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant. Because all dosage levels are lower than the total hemagglutinin content of the FLUAD® vaccine used in Europe, subjects will be enrolled into all dosage and adjuvant groups concurrently using a randomized, double-blind study design. Ninety-six persons 18-34 years of age will be enrolled. A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine will be used throughout the trial. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Screening and safety laboratory examinations will be assessed before the first dose and 7 days after each vaccination. Assessments for reactogenicity will be done for at least 20 minutes after each vaccination, in the clinic 2 and 7 days after each inoculation, via diary card for seven days after each vaccination, and via phone or other contact at 7 months after the first vaccination for any serious adverse events during the entire study period. Serum and nasal wash samples collected on days 0, 28, and 56 will be used to measure immunogenicity of the vaccine preparation. Participants will be involved in study related procedures for up to 8 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
96

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 34 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory, healthy males and non-pregnant female adults 18-34 years of age.
  • Able to give informed consent and available for all study visits.
  • Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures.
  • Women capable of bearing children must utilize an acceptable means of birth control (abstinence, oral contraceptives ("the pill"), intrauterine devices (IUDs), contraceptive implants under the skin, or contraceptive injections, or condoms with foam).
  • On no concomitant medications except contraceptive medications.
  • Normal screening laboratory values.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to eggs or other components of vaccine.
  • Prior receipt of an influenza A/H9N2 vaccine.
  • Abnormal screening laboratory values (laboratory values must be within normal limits).
  • Pregnancy, desire to become pregnant in the next 3 months, or lactation.
  • Immunosuppression as a result of underlying illness or treatment.
  • Use of oral or parenteral steroids, high-dose inhaled steroids (>800 mcg per day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent), other immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs.
  • Active neoplastic disease or history of any hematologic malignancy.
  • Acute or chronic condition that (in the opinion of the investigator) would render vaccination unsafe or would interfere with the evaluation of responses (including but not limited to the following: known chronic liver disease, significant renal disease, unstable or progressive neurologic disorder, diabetes mellitus, transplant recipient).
  • Use of experimental vaccines or medications within the month prior to study entry, or expected use of experimental or licensed vaccines or blood/blood products during the 1 month period after each inoculation with study vaccine.
  • Receipt of immunoglobulin or other blood product within 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Receipt of other licensed vaccines within the preceding 2 weeks (inactivated vaccines) or 4 weeks (live vaccines).
  • History of a severe reaction following vaccination with a contemporary influenza vaccine.
  • Subject is enrolled in another clinical trial.
  • Study personnel (those persons identified on study personnel logs).
  • Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the interpretation or evaluation of the vaccine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group 1A: 3.75 mcg A/H9N2 no adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 3.75 mcg A/H9N2 with no adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Experimental: Group 2B: 7.5 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 7.5 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Drug: MF59 adjuvant
MF59 adjuvant is an oil-in-water emulsion.
Experimental: Group 3A: 15 mcg A/H9N2 no adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 15 mcg A/H9N2 with no adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Experimental: Group 3B: 15 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 15 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Drug: MF59 adjuvant
MF59 adjuvant is an oil-in-water emulsion.
Experimental: Group 4B: 30 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 30 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Drug: MF59 adjuvant
MF59 adjuvant is an oil-in-water emulsion.
Experimental: Group 4A: 30 mcg A/H9N2 no adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 30 mcg A/H9N2 with no adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Experimental: Group 2A: 7.5 mcg A/H9N2 no adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 7.5 mcg A/H9N2 with no adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Experimental: Group 1B: 3.75 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant
12 subjects to receive 3.75 mcg A/H9N2 plus MF59 adjuvant.
Biological: Influenza A/H9N2 vaccine
A single lot of monovalent inactivated SA influenza A/H9N2 vaccine. All injections will be administered in a 0.5-mL volume into the deltoid muscle. Dosage levels are: 3.75-, 7.5-, 15-, and 30-mcg of HA of the vaccine strain with and without MF59 adjuvant.
Drug: MF59 adjuvant
MF59 adjuvant is an oil-in-water emulsion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The frequency and severity of solicited local and systemic adverse events in each vaccine dosage level group.
Time Frame: Duration of study.
Duration of study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportions of subjects in each vaccine dosage group that achieve a serum HAI titer of at least 1:32.
Time Frame: One month after the second vaccination.
One month after the second vaccination.
Rates of significant increases in titer between pre- and post-immunization serum samples 28 days after each vaccination.
Time Frame: Days 28 and 56.
Days 28 and 56.
The geometric mean titer (GMT) of serum HAI antibody against the influenza A/H9N2 virus.
Time Frame: One month after the second vaccination.
One month after the second vaccination.
The proportion of subjects with a 4-fold or greater increase in percent HA-specific antibody in nasal wash specimens for each vaccine group.
Time Frame: Nasal wash samples collected on Days 0, 28, and 56.
Nasal wash samples collected on Days 0, 28, and 56.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 19, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 23, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 04-019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings