Study Comparing Tigecycline and Imipenem/Cilastatin in Chinese Subjects With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline> vs Imipenem/Cilastatin to Treat Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Chinese Subjects
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100044
-
Beijing, China, 100730
-
Beijing, China, 100853
-
Shanghai, China, 200040
-
Shanghai, China, 200001
-
Shanghai, China, 200433
-
Shanghai, China, 200092
-
Wuhan, China, 300063
-
-
Chengdu
-
Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, China, 610041
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shengyang, Liaoning, China, 110001
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
· Hospitalized male or female subjects over 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
· Subjects with any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude an evaluation of a response or make it unlikely that the contemplated course of therapy or follow-up visits could be completed.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
armDesc1
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
|---|
|
Clinical response for all microbiologically evaluable and microbiologically modified intent-to-treat subjects at the test-of-cure visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
|---|
|
Microbiological response at the subject and pathogen level and evaluation of microbiological data, such as decreased susceptibility, response rates by baseline isolate and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and susceptibility data by isolate
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fomin P, Koalov S, Cooper A, Babinchak T, Dartois N, De Vane N, Castaing N, Tellado J; 301 And 306 Study Groups. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections - the European experience. J Chemother. 2008 Oct;20 Suppl 1:12-9. doi: 10.1179/joc.2008.20.Supplement-1.12.
- Chen Z, Wu J, Zhang Y, Wei J, Leng X, Bi J, Li R, Yan L, Quan Z, Chen X, Yu Y, Wu Z, Liu D, Ma X, Maroko R, Cooper A. Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 21;10:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-217.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3074A1-316
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.