Treatment of Moderate Vein Graft Lesions With Paclitaxel Drug Eluting Stents: The VELETI Trial (VELETI)

November 23, 2011 updated by: Laval University

Sealing Moderate Coronary Saphenous VEin Graft LEsions With the Paclitaxel-eluting Stent (Taxus) as a New Approach to Maintain Vein Graft Patency and Reduce Cardiac Events: a Pilot Intravascular Ultrasound Study.

HYPOTHESIS

  1. Sealing moderate SVG lesions with the TAXUS stent prevents SVG atherosclerosis progression as evaluated by IVUS.
  2. Sealing moderate SVG lesions with the TAXUS stent does not accelerate SVG atherosclerosis in the angiographically non-diseased segments of the SVG as evaluated by IVUS.

OBJECTIVES

  1. To determine the effect of stenting moderate SVG lesions with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in comparison with medical treatment on limiting SVG disease progression as evaluated by IVUS.
  2. To evaluate by IVUS the effect of stenting moderate SVG lesions with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in comparison with medical treatment on atherosclerosis progression in angiographically non-diseased SVGs segments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective randomized study assessing the efficacy of stenting moderate SVG lesions with the taxus stent in the prevention of atherosclerosis progression of SVGs as evaluated by IVUS. Patients with previous coronary bypass surgery with SVG implantation undergoing coronary angiography by clinical indication will be screened. If the patient has a moderate lesion at any level of the SVGs it will be includable in the study. After inclusion, the patients will be randomized to either stenting the moderate SVG lesion with the taxus stent or standard medical treatment. The use of a filter wire during dilation will be strongly recommended. Following this procedure, all patients will have clinical controls at 1 month and at 6 months and an angiographic and IVUS control study at 1 year follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Laval Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written and signed informed consent.
  • Patients ≥18 years old.
  • Clinical indication for cardiac catheterization and SVG angiography.
  • Presence of at least one SVG lesion of 30% to 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation which is (are) not the culprit lesion (s) responsible for the clinical syndrome of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ejection fraction <20%.
  • Renal insufficiency with creatinine > 250 mg/dl.
  • Presence of more than 3 moderate SVG stenosis or significant diffuse SVG disease.
  • Unsuccessful angioplasty (residual stenosis >30% and/or TIMI flow <3) of any other lesion treated during the same procedure.
  • Coronary angioplasty of the target SVG in the past.
  • Cardiogenic shock .
  • Remaining lesion (s) with a treatment planned within the following year.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Contraindication to aspirin and/or clopidogrel treatment.
  • Allergy to paclitaxel.
  • Any disease with a limiting life-expectancy (to less than 2 years).
  • Definite presence or high suspicion of thrombus or ulceration in the target lesion.
  • Target lesion located in the same SVG than the culprit lesion (if present) and the distance between the target lesion and the most proximal or distal part of the stent implanted at the culprit lesion is < 4 cm.
  • Vein graft diameter < 2.5 mm.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PCI-stenting
Stenting the moderate SVG lesion with the paclitaxel stent
Patients are randomized to either stenting the moderate SVG lesion with the paclitaxel stent or standard medical treatment
Other Names:
  • Taxus (paclitaxel eluting stent)
Other: Standard medical treatment
Patients are randomized to either stenting the moderate SVG lesion with the paclitaxel stent or standard medical treatment
Other Names:
  • Taxus (paclitaxel eluting stent)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Ultrasound lumen area and minimal lumen diameter at follow-up at the tomographic section showing the most severe stenosis, comparing stented vs medically treated SVGs lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Change between baseline and follow-up in ultrasound lumen area and minimal lumen diameter (% and absolute value) at the tomographic section showing the most severe stenosis, comparing stented vs medically treated SVGs lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Change in atheroma volume (% and absolute value) as evaluated by IVUS between baseline and follow-up in an angiographically non-diseased 40 mm segment (excluding the target lesion), comparing stented vs medically treated SVGs
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cumulative incidence of clinical events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
SVG occlusion rate, lesion/stent late loss, minimal lumen diameter, and % diameter stenosis as assessed by angiography at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier F Bertrand, MD, PhD, Laval Hospital Research Center
  • Principal Investigator: Josep Rodes-Cabau, MD, Laval Hospital Research Center
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Delarocheliere, MD, Laval Hospital Research Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Laval-VG-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.