Study to Evaluate Ferris PainWrap in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

April 17, 2007 updated by: Pain and Rehabilitation Medicine

A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Pilot Study to Evaluate Ferris PainWrap, a Semipermeable Hydrophilic Polymeric Membrane, in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

The purpose of this study is to see if the Ferris PainWrap is effective in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a phase 4 study to determine if a semipermeable hydrophilic membrane marketed as Ferris PainWrap can relieve low back pain more effectively than a placebo wrap. In the United States, the prevalence of low back pain of at least 1 month's duration is about 15% and its incidence is 5%. It is one of the two most common pain complaints. Low back pain is thus a major health problem in this country and worldwide. Treatment that relieves low back pain and restores function would be of great benefit to the individual and the community at large, particularly if the treatment is convenient and has no significant adverse effects. Ferris PainWrap was originally developed as a burn dressing and is commercially available for this purpose. The Food and Drug Administration approved the material as Ferris Hydrophilic Dressing for marketing in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. The material is classified as a medical device. It was found to relieve pain, inflammation, swelling, and bruising over traumatized areas. Subsequently, it appeared to relieve low back pain in informal, open (non-blinded) trials. The proposed mechanism for low back pain relief is by alteration of cutaneous A-beta receptor and possibly cutaneous A-delta fiber function through shifts in sodium and water concentrations in the skin. This study will compare a "no dose" placebo to a "high-dose" back wrap. It is a one year pilot study which will be randomized, double-blinded, and controlled, comparing Ferris PainWrap to an identical appearing placebo back wrap in individuals with chronic low back pain of three months duration or longer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20814
        • Pain and Rehabilitation Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speakers, necessary to understand the protocol and communicate observations to the investigators
  • Low back pain of 3 months or longer. Acceptable conditions include non-specific low back pain or pain associated with lumbar spondylosis without neurological impairment associated with the stenosis.
  • Numerical Pain Rating Scale value of 4.5 or higher, estimated for the past week where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain.
  • Pain must interfere in some way with daily activities, assessed by Roland and Morris Disability Survey.
  • Beck Depression Inventory score of 20 or less.
  • Physical examination findings of tenderness, muscle spasm or taut bands, or myofascial trigger points in the low back region. The low back region is defined as the lumbosacral region, below the 12th thoracic vertebra down to the sacro-coccygeal junction, and extending laterally to the plane of the lumbar vertebral transverse processes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • NPR rating score of less than 4.5.
  • Neurologic impairment in the legs (absent knee or ankle deep tendon reflexes, dermatome sensory loss or weakness) that indicates lumbar radiculopathy.
  • Presence of cancer (previous diagnosis of cancer, or treated cancer with no sign of recurrence for 5 years is acceptable).
  • Presence of systemic disease that can cause low back pain (endometriosis, prostatitis, chronic renal disease, recurrent urinary tract infections, or other acute infections, not including simple upper respiratory infections without significant coughing).
  • Pending litigation involving back injury.
  • Back related disability.
  • Lumbar laminectomy.
  • Subjects cannot have participated in other research studies within 3 months of starting this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Numerical pain rating scale

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Pain pressure threshold as determined by the Fischer algometer
Number of tender regions, taut bands, reproduction of usual and referred pain, recorded as present or absent
Range of motion as measured by inclinometer
Roland Morris Back Pain Disability score
Short Form-36 score
Daily count of analgesics taken
Pain diary, rating low back pain as none, mild, moderate, or severe

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pain and Rehabilitation Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ferris Mfg. Corp.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert D Gerwin, MD, Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 14, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 18, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2007

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NA_00003008

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings