Pilot Study to Evaluate The Effectiveness And Safety Of Axiom Worldwide Drx9000™ Spinal Decompression System

May 4, 2016 updated by: NEMA Research, Inc.

Pilot Study to Evaluate The Effectiveness And Safety Of Axiom Worldwide Drx9000™ Spinal Decompression System For Treatment of Low Back Pain

This pilot study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Axiom Worldwide DRX9000 for active treatment of chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Currently, there are no prospective safety and/or outcomes studies utilizing the DRX9000™ in the peer-reviewed medical literature. There are published trials utilizing similar machines which provided evidence in support of the FDA granted indications for use spinal decompression and of the DRX9000™. Axiom Worldwide has determined it will be of benefit to the continuing medical care of patients and a furthering of the scientific knowledge of the treatment of LBP to complete such a prospective evaluation using a standardized treatment protocol. This study will therefore attempt to establish and validate the safety and efficacy of this computerized spinal decompression system in the treatment of LBP and sciatica.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90212
        • Vibrance Medical Group
    • Florida
      • Naples, Florida, United States, 34108
        • Naples Anesthesia and Pain Associates
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • Active Health and Wellness Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, greater than 18 years of age
  • Able to understand possible risks and benefits and provide written informed consent (ICF) to the IRB approved clinical multimodal protocol
  • LBP with an intensity level of greater than 4 on an eleven point numerical pain rating scale (VRS) of 0-10 (with 0 - no pain and 10 - worst possible pain)
  • Completed the necessary diagnostic and medical history evaluations as described in the protocol to confirm the patient's diagnosis and eligibility for the study and DRX9000 treatment protocol.
  • Willing and able to complete a six week 20 session of DRX9000 outpatient treatments and a minimum of 6 months follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Evidence of neurological motor deficits on clinical examination
  • Evidence of spinal cord compression, metastatic cancer, tumor, hematoma, infection or compression fracture
  • Evidence of severe central stenosis with neurological deficits or nerve root entrapment
  • Litigation for health-related claim (in process or pending), Worker's Compensation, or Personal Injury
  • Previous spine fusion surgery, insertion of hardware or artificial disc
  • Hemiplegia or paraplegia
  • History of severe cardiovascular or metabolic disease, or abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Unwillingness to postpone other types of therapy for LBP during the 6 week treatment sessions
  • Known alcohol abuse or drug abuse
  • Height less than 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm) or greater than 6 feet 8 inches (203 cm)
  • Body weight greater than 300 pounds (136 kg)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: DRX Group
Patients using the device DRX9000™.
Device: DRX9000™
Device is designed to apply spinal decompressive forces.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-treatment Numerical Pain Intensity Rating Scale (VRS), Which is a Scale From 0-10 (0=no Pain, 10= Worst Pain)
Time Frame: Six weeks
The numerical results of the post-treatment verbal numerical pain intensity rating scale (VRS) following completion of a standard six week series of 20 DRX9000 treatments.
Six weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence for Significant (VRS Greater Than or Equal to 4) LBP Following Completion of 6 Weeks of DRX9000 Treatment.
Time Frame: Six weeks
The number of Subjects reporting VRS greater than or equal to 4 for LBP following completion of 6 weeks of DRX9000 treatment will be recorded.
Six weeks
Change in Functional Capacity From Baseline to Six Weeks (The Revised Oswestry Pain Questionaire)
Time Frame: Six weeks
Subject functional capacity following 6 weeks of DRX9000 treatment will be measured as a numerical score by the Revised Oswestry Pain Questionaire (scale 0-50, 0=pain without effects). Functional capacity was assessed at Baseline, 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks.
Six weeks
Patient's Satisfaction With Treatment Procedures Following 6 Weeks of DRX9000 Treatment.
Time Frame: Six weeks
Patient's satisfaction with treatment procedures following 6 weeks of DRX9000 treatment was measured on a scale from 0-10 (0= very unsatisfied, 10=very satisfied).
Six weeks
Number of Adverse Events Following 6 Weeks of DRX9000 Treatment.
Time Frame: Six weeks
Total number of adverse events reported following 6 weeks of DRX9000 treatment.
Six weeks
Number of Patients Who Withdraw From Study.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Total number of patients who withdrew during the 6 weeks of treatment.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NEMA Research, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John Leslie, MD, Mayo Clinic
  • Study Director: Charlotte Richmond, PhD, NEMA Research, Inc.
  • Study Chair: Joseph V Pergolizzi, MD, Naples Anesthesia and Pain Associates

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 19, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 21, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P-AXW01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on DRX9000™

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings