Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder
An Open-Label Multicenter Study of Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder Construct in Subjects With Spina Bifida
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Boston Childrens Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- subjects with neurogenic bladders secondary to myleodysplasia
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior augment procedures
- recent urologic surgery
- requires concomitant urologic intervention
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Neo-bladder construction
Surgical implantation of autologous neo-bladder construct
|
augmentation cystoplasty with autologous neo-bladder construct
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Responders as Assessed by Compliance
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Efficacy of the autologous neo-bladder construct as assessed by a responder analysis (comparing each patient's baseline with 12 month data).
Improvement in compliance (i.e.
improved bladder pressure/volume relationship) was measured by urodynamics at predetermined bladder pressure points.
This was coupled with an assessment of clinical benefit and used to determine responders versus non-responders
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Safety Profile - Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event
Time Frame: periodically within first 12 months as well as during long term follow up out to 5 years
|
clinical evaluation of adverse events, laboratory parameters and urinary imaging to assess any safety issues emerging from this technology and to allow a comparison of a safety profile with standard of care enterocystoplasty.
Please refer to the Adverse Event section for detailed information.
|
periodically within first 12 months as well as during long term follow up out to 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Sunita Sheth, MD, Tengion, Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TNG-CL003
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.