Assessment Of Infrared Photobiotherapy for Improved Wound Healing

April 3, 2025 updated by: Martin Skie, MD, University of Toledo Health Science Campus

Assessment of Infrared Photobiotherapy for Improved Wound Healing

The purpose of this study is to examine whether or not Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) can reduce pain and/or improve wound healing in patients with an acute traumatic injury to the upper extremity (wrist, forearm, or elbow).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, two group, controlled study using random assignment. All eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the control group (usual care) or the experimental group (usual care plus LLLT). We plan to enroll 50 subjects in this study: 25 subjects will be randomly assigned to the LLLT group and 25 to the usual care group.

All subjects will be recruited within one to two days prior to hospital discharge or at the time of their first postoperative clinic visit. No subjects will be recruited while sedated or receiving intravenous pain medication.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43614
        • University of Toledo, Health Science Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 and < 85 years
  • Acute traumatic injury of an upper extremity (wrist, forearm, or elbow)
  • Currently resides within 100 miles of UMC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Pacemaker
  • Medications that have heat or light-sensitivity contraindications (such as: steroids, some antibiotics)
  • Two or more cardiac risk factors
  • Intraoperative complications
  • Wound infection
  • Open Wound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
Low Level Laser Therapy
Device: Low Level Laser Therapy
7500 megawatts with a 980 nm treatment beam every 48 hours for two weeks beginning at suture removal.
No Intervention: 2
No Laser Therapy. Outcome Measures the same.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FACES Pain Rating Scale Scores
Time Frame: baseline (2 weeks after surgery)
The FACES pain scale ranged from 0-10, with lower scores representing less pain and better outcome.
baseline (2 weeks after surgery)
FACES Pain Rating Scale Scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery
The FACES pain scale ranged from 0-10, with lower scores representing less pain and better outcome.
6 weeks after surgery
FACES Pain Rating Scale.
Time Frame: 12 weeks after surgery
The FACES pain scale ranged from 0-10, with lower scores representing less pain and better outcome.
12 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
36-Item Short Form Survey - Bodily Pain Scores
Time Frame: baseline (2 weeks after surgery)

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
baseline (2 weeks after surgery)
36-Item Short Form Survey - Bodily Pain Scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
6 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Bodily Pain Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
12 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - General Health
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery (baseline)

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
2 weeks after surgery (baseline)
36-Item Short Form Survey - General Health
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
6 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - General Health
Time Frame: 12 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
12 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Physical Function
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery (baseline)

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
2 weeks after surgery (baseline)
36-Item Short Form Survey - Physical Function
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
6 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Physical Function
Time Frame: 12 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
12 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Mental Health
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery (baseline)

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
2 weeks after surgery (baseline)
36-Item Short Form Survey - Mental Health
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
6 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Mental Health
Time Frame: 12 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
12 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Social Function
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery (baseline)

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
2 weeks after surgery (baseline)
36-Item Short Form Survey - Social Function
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
6 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Survey - Social Function
Time Frame: 12 weeks after surgery

Response to questions generates a numerical score, with a higher score representing a better outcome.

Measures health-related quality of life across 8 domains, with each domain scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores.
12 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Toledo Health Science Campus

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Martin Skie, MD, University of Toledo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 22, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Wound Healing

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Healing

Clinical Trials on Low Level Laser Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings