Botswana TDF/FTC Oral HIV Prophylaxis Trial (TDF2)

January 24, 2020 updated by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Daily Oral Antiretroviral Use for the Prevention of HIV Infection in Heterosexually Active Young Adults in Botswana

This study tested whether taking a pill of tenofovir and emtricitabine (two antiretroviral medicines) was safe for sexually-active young adults in Botswana without HIV infection and whether it reduced their risk of getting an HIV infection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Twelve hundred and nineteen healthy, sexually active women and men, 18-39 years old, without HIV infection were enrolled in Francistown and Gaborone, Botswana. They were provided with free male and female condoms, repeated individualized risk-reduction counseling, diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases, and women will be provided with a choice of effective family planning methods. In addition, volunteers were randomized to receive either Tenofovir and emtricitabine (in a single pill) or a placebo pill to take once a day. Volunteers were seen monthly for at least 12 months to monitor for side effects and toxicities and to test their HIV status. Persons who become HIV infected during the trial received ongoing supportive counseling, CD4 and viral load monitoring, education about HIV infection/disease, and access to HIV care including free antiretrovirals when clinically indicated. Volunteer safety was monitored by a local ethics committee, Centers for Disease Control Institutional Review Board (CDC IRB) and an independent data safety and monitoring board

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1219

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Botswana
      • Gaborone, Botswana
        • BOTUSA HIV Prevention Research Unit
  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30333
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • citizen of Botswana 18-39 years old
  • sexually active
  • HIV uninfected
  • Hepatitis B and C uninfected
  • Calculated creatinine clearance >= 60 mL/min
  • hemoglobin >= 8 gm/dL
  • ALT and AST <= 2x ULN
  • total bilirubin <= 1.5 mg/dL
  • total serum amylase <= 1.5x ULN
  • Serum phosphorus >= 2.2 mg/dL
  • willing to use hormonal contraception (females)
  • living within 1 hours travel of study clinic
  • pass comprehension test
  • willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 18-20 without parent/guardian consent
  • history of significant renal or bone disease
  • any chronic illness requiring ongoing prescription medication
  • pregnant or breastfeeding
  • planning to move away from site in the next year
  • participating in another HIV prevention or vaccine safety trial
  • any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the study physician, would make the volunteer unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with the dosing requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: TDF-FTC,condoms,adh/risk counseling
Eligible participants were randomized to oral Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 300 mg + Emtricitabine 200 mg (TDF-FTC) once daily in the form of a single tablet. The ratio of randomization was 1:1. Participants randomized to the active arm received male and female condoms, risk reduction counseling, adherence counseling, and routine monitoring for HIV infection, laboratory abnormalities, and adverse events.
Drug: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 300 mg + Emtricitabine 200 mg
Other Names:
  • Truvada
Placebo Comparator: Placebo,condoms,adh/risk counseling
Eligible participants were randomized to the placebo arm and received placebo oral tablets that were visually identical to the TDF-FTC tablet and taken once daily. The placebo tablets contained no active ingredients. The ratio of randomization was 1:1. Participants randomized to the placebo arm received male and female condoms, personalized risk reduction counseling, adherence counseling, and routine monitoring for HIV infection, laboratory abnormalities, and adverse events.
Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions in the Tenofovir/Emtricitabine and Placebo Arms
Time Frame: Monthly, for up to 3 years
Study visits were scheduled every 30 days until completion of the study, and participants were instructed to return to the clinic for evaluation in the event of an illness. Participants reported any adverse effects at monthly visits and interim visits.
Monthly, for up to 3 years
HIV Incidence in the Tenofovir/Emtricitabine and Placebo Arms
Time Frame: Monthly, for up to 3 years
Study visits were scheduled every 30 days until completion of the study and during monthly study visits, we performed testing for HIV infection. At completion of the study, we tested all participants for HIV infection, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The primary efficacy end point was the difference in the rates of HIV infection between participants assigned to receive TDF-FTC and those assigned to receive placebo. The initial efficacy analysis included all study participants who were randomly assigned to receive a study medication (intention-to-treat cohort).
Monthly, for up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Condom Use During Study: Number of Participants With >=1 Condomless Sex Acts
Time Frame: 12 months
We assessed condom use of the enrolled participants by face-to-face interviews (at baseline and monthly thereafter) and provided a comprehensive package of HIV prevention services, including individualized counseling on risk reduction, free male and female condoms, and screening for sexually transmitted infections followed, if applicable, by partner notification and treatment.
12 months
Rates of Adherence to Study Medication
Time Frame: 36 months
The rates of adherence to study medication by treatment arm was assessed over the entire course of the study. This comparison was done by assessing the percentage of pills taken by participants within each study arm. The difference between the 2 arms was compared with a Fisher' exact test.
36 months
Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance Patterns in Seroconverters
Time Frame: At time HIV infection diagnosed,1 month post-time of HIV infection diagnosis, and 6 months post-time of HIV infection diagnosis
Participants who seroconverted had blood samples taken at the time of infection and at one month and six months post seroconversion to detect any HIV resistance mutations.
At time HIV infection diagnosed,1 month post-time of HIV infection diagnosis, and 6 months post-time of HIV infection diagnosis
CD4 Evaluation After HIV Seroconversion
Time Frame: 1-year post seroconversion
Study medication was stopped when HIV infected was diagnosed. Seroconvertors were referred for clinical care and followed an additional year with scheduled quarterly CD4+ cell count assessments. A model-estimated geometric mean of the CD4+ cell counts by each treatment group was evaluated.
1-year post seroconversion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Gilead Sciences
Botswana Ministry of Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Thigpen, MD MPH, National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • Principal Investigator: Lynn Paxton, MD MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CDC-NCHHSTP-4940
  • BOTUSA MB06 (Other Identifier: CDC-BOTUSA)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing will be governed by prevailing CDC data sharing policies.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings