Interactive Voice Response Telephone Technology for the Treatment of Smoking in Patients With Heart Disease (IVR)

June 25, 2026 updated by: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

An Interactive, Voice Response-Mediated, Follow-up and Triage System for Smoking Cessation in Smokers With Coronary Heart Disease

A randomized control trial is planned to evaluate an interactive voice response (IVR) mediated follow-up and triage system, against usual care, to help smokers hospitalized with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to quit smoking. The investigators hypothesize that compared to usual care, participants in the IVR group will; a) have a significantly higher 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate at 26 and 52 weeks after hospital discharge, b) will have a higher rate of continuous abstinence at 26 and 52 weeks after hospital discharge, c) will use a greater number of proven effective interventions over time, and d) will develop greater self-efficacy with respect to smoking cessation, over time.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Quitting smoking appears to be the single most effective intervention or treatment to reduce mortality in patients with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). However, despite interventions, almost two-thirds of smokers resumed smoking in the year after hospitalization for CHD related illnesses; one-third resumed smoking within one month. A critical challenge for institution-level programs is how to provide consistent patient follow-up and linkage to community-based smoking cessation resources. Interactive voice response (IVR) technology has the potential to improve follow-up with smokers after hospitalization and to enhance triage to clinical support for smoking cessation. IVR uses natural language to place automated out-going calls that can pose questions regarding smoking status and progress with smoking cessation, that is then dropped into a database. A counselor is then able to link with the database and obtain information about the patient's smoking cessation needs and provide support as appropriate. A randomized control trial (RCT) is planned to evaluate whether an IVR system for follow-up and triage helps smokers hospitalized for CHD, quit smoking over 26- and 52-week follow-up periods. Participants are randomized into either a Usual Care or IVR group. Both groups will receive in-patient counseling and offer of nicotine replacement therapy. The IVR group will additionally receive a telephone call from the IVR system three, 14, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 days after hospital discharge. Variables that will be assessed at 26 and 52 weeks include: smoking status, both 7-day point-prevalent and continuous abstinence, as well as self-efficacy for smoking cessation, use of effective cessation resources and patient satisfaction (at 26 weeks).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
440

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y4W
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is currently a smoker (greater than 5 cigarettes per day in the month preceding admission);
  2. Patient is 18 years of age and older;
  3. Patient is admitted to the in-patient cardiology service at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI) for: a) Acute Coronary Syndrome (includes patients admitted for unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction), b) Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), c) Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) or d) diagnostic catheterization procedures related to CHD;
  4. Patient has received automatic referral for smoking cessation counseling;
  5. Patient is willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is unable to read and understand English;
  2. Patient lives more than 1.5 hours from UOHI;
  3. Patient is returning to referring institution/hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Interactive Voice Response Group
Behavioral: Interactive Voice Response
The IVR group will receive a telephone call from the IVR system three, 14, 30, 90, 120 and 150 days after hospital discharge.
No Intervention: Usual Care Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuous Abstinence Rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 26 weeks
Self-reported abstinence from any tobacco product during the time period.
Baseline to 26 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuous Abstinence Rate
Time Frame: 27 to 52 weeks
Self-reported abstinence from any tobacco product during the time period.
27 to 52 weeks
7-day Point-prevalence Abstinence Rates
Time Frame: At weeks 26 and 52.
no smoking (not even a puff) in the preceding 7 days
At weeks 26 and 52.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Robert D Reid, PhD., University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Minto Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Pipe, C.M, MD, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Minto Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Bonnie Quinlan, BSCN, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Heather Sherrard, BSCN, MHA, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NA 5845

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings