Acupuncture for Diabetic Gastroparesis

December 14, 2008 updated by: Shaare Zedek Medical Center

A Randomized, Placebo/Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Diabetic Gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis is a common complication of prolonged diabetes mellitus, both with Type 1 and Type 2 forms. Treatment of diabetic gastroparesis ranges from changing dietary habits to medications and invasive procedures, all of which offer only partial and transient relief, with some options having potentially harmful effects. Acupuncture is an ancient treatment which has been found to be beneficial for many ailments, including those involving the gastrointestinal tract. We propose to evaluate whether acupuncture is an effective and safe treatment for diabetic gastroparesis using a randomized, double-blind, placebo/sham-controlled crossover trial. Because symptoms of gastroparesis do not correlate well with objective tests of gastric emptying (i.e., scintigraphy or 13C breath tests), our primary outcome value will be the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), a reliable and validated instrument for quantifying symptoms in these patients. As a secondary outcome we will measure gastric emptying using a C13-acetate breath test, as well as the SF-12 Short Form Health Survey. Blinding of the participants will be evaluated using a Validation of Blinding Questionnaire at the end of the treatment period.

Diabetic patients suffering from moderate gastroparesis (total GCSI score > 2.50) who fulfill the inclusion criteria (and none of the exclusion criteria) will be eligible to participate in the study. On induction, participants will fill out the GCSI questionnaire and SF-36 survey, and will undergo a C13-acetate breath test. They will then be randomly assigned to either true acupuncture treatment or placebo/sham acupuncture treatment. Each participant will undergo 8 treatments twice-weekly, for a period of 4 weeks. At the end of the eighth treatment session, each participant will again fill out a GCSI questionnaire and SF-12 form, as well as repeating the C13-acetate breath. Following a 4-week washout period, patients will be crossed over to either placebo/sham or true acupuncture treatment, again 8 twice-weekly treatments, for a period of 4 weeks. At the end of the second treatment regimen all participants will again fill out a GCSI questionnaire and SF-12 form, and undergo a C13-acetate breath test. At the end of the second treatment regimen participants will again fill out a Validation of Blinding Questionnaire.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91031
        • The Center for Integrative Complementary Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hadassah University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years and older;
  • Controlled diabetes (<250 mg/dL);
  • Moderate gastroparesis (GCSI > 2.50);
  • Ability to comply with study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past experience with acupuncture;
  • History of gastric surgery, intrapyloric botulinum toxin, gastric pacemaker;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes or evidence of diabetic ketoacidosis;
  • Malabsorptive syndrome, liver or pulmonary disease;
  • Pregnancy or fertility treatments;
  • Overt psychopathology.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: A
Acupuncture - 2 treatments weekly, 4 weeks (8 treatment)
Other: Acupuncture
acupuncture treatment (or placebo), 20 minute treatment each; twice weekly for four weeks (total of eight treatments). repeat treatment schedule following crossover (placebo-treatment)
Placebo Comparator: B
Placebo/sham treatment; twice weekly for 4 weeks (total 8 treatments)
Procedure: placebo/sham acupuncture
acupuncture at sham points without skin penetration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
GCSI score
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
SF-12 Health Survey Questionnaire; C-13 acetate breath test
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Noah Samuels, M.D., Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Lysy, M.D., Hadassah University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 7, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 16, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2008

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ACP.GP.07

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings